Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Iterated derivative ideals preserve support in the safe characteristic range

Statement

Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice) for the completed-local and smooth-coordinate arguments.

Let (I,μ) be a marked ideal on a smooth K-scheme X with I≠0 (Marked ideals and their support, Smooth morphism of schemes), and let 0≤i≤μ−1 (Derivative ideals of an ideal sheaf and of a marked ideal). In every characteristic, supp⁡(I,μ)⊆supp⁡(Di(I),μ−i), and, when K is perfect, supp⁡(I,μ) is closed. If K has characteristic zero, or is perfect of characteristic p>0 with μ<p (Field), then the inclusion is an equality. In these same characteristics, for μ≥1 the condition ord⁡x(I)≤μ for every x∈X is equivalent to Dμ(I)=OX.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A marked ideal (I,μ) on a smooth K-scheme X and an integer 0≤i≤μ−1.

[F1]

Derivative ideals of an ideal sheaf and of a marked ideal: D0(I)=I, Di(I) is generated locally by generators f of I and their coordinate partial derivatives of order at most i; the recursive identity Di(Dj(I))=Di+j(I) holds in every characteristic.

[F2]

Order of an ideal sheaf at a point: ord⁡x(I)=max⁡{n:Ix⊆mx n}, with order at least μ equivalent to vanishing in OX,x/mxμ.

[F3]

Marked ideals and their support: supp⁡(I,μ)={x:ord⁡x(I)≥μ}.

[F4]

The regular-local associated-graded and completion theorems identify gr⁡mA with κ(x)[U1,…,Ud] and its completion with κ(x)⟦u1,…,ud⟧ when K is perfect. A coefficient field containing K is obtained by lifting a separating transcendence basis of κ(x)/K, then its finite separable algebraic generators by the coefficient-field adjunction lemmas. The parameter map is surjective by the Cohen presentation and injective by the associated-graded isomorphism. These are associated graded ring of a regular local ring, Completion of a Noetherian local ring is local with the same residue field, completion preserves regular local rings, A complete equicharacteristic Noetherian local ring is a power-series quotient, Transcendental residue elements adjoin across a maximal subfield, and Separable residue elements adjoin across a maximal subfield. Formal parameter derivatives restrict to derivations A→A^; since ΩA/K is finite free locally, universality identifies them with A^-linear combinations of the algebraic derivations (Differentials of a smooth morphism, Derivations are maps out of Ω). Iterated Leibniz therefore puts their order-r derivatives of f∈I in Dr(I)A^.

[F5]

On an étale chart to affine N-space, the infinitesimal Taylor map with coordinate increments t1,…,tN exists uniquely by Etale morphisms are the formally etale morphisms locally of finite presentation, modulo (t)μ. Its finitely many coefficients for a function f are the Hasse derivatives of orders <μ, regular functions on the chart. Over a perfect field, their residues all vanish at x exactly when f∈mxμ. Indeed the completed chart can be expressed using a separating residue-field coordinate system and the normal parameters in [F4]; Taylor substitution in the normal parameters detects every nonzero initial form of degree <μ. An invertible change of smooth coordinates gives invertible changes of these truncated Taylor coefficients. This reasoning concerns Hasse derivatives, and uses no factorial division.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3algebra

If Ix⊆mxμ, Leibniz shows D(mxa)⊆mxa−1 for every derivation D and a≥1: differentiate each product of a elements of mx. Iterating gives Di(I)x⊆mxμ−i. This proves the forward inclusion over any field, independently of perfection or factorials.

1.2F2F3F5

Assume K perfect. For finitely many local generators fj of I, take the finitely many Taylor coefficients in [F5] of orders <μ. Their simultaneous vanishing locus is exactly {x:Ix⊆mxμ}, so this set is closed on each chart and hence on X. This proves closedness in the stated perfect-field range, in every characteristic.

1.3F1F2F4

Reverse inclusion in the safe-order range. Assume char⁡K=0 or K perfect with char⁡K=p>μ. If x∈supp⁡(Di(I),μ−i) but ord⁡x(I)=j<μ, choose f∈Ix of order j and let fj be its nonzero initial form in [F4]. If j≤i, choose a monomial cUα of fj with ∣α∣=j and differentiate by ∂α; its initial constant term is cα!≠0, since j≤μ<p in positive characteristic. This puts a unit in Di(I)x, contradicting its order being at least μ−i≥1. If i<j, choose a monomial cUα of fj and a multiindex β≤α with ∣β∣=i. Then ∂βfj is nonzero: its selected coefficient is a product of falling factorials of integers at most j<p, so is nonzero in κ(x). Hence ∂βf has order exactly j−i<μ−i, contradicting the same support assumption. Thus the reverse inclusion holds in the stated range.

2.1F1F2F4step 1.1∎

The maximal-order criterion in the same range. Suppose first that ord⁡x(I)≤μ for every x. For a point with j:=ord⁡x(I)>0, choose f of order j and a monomial cUα in its initial form; ∣α∣=j≤μ, and the coefficient of ∂αf is cα!≠0 in characteristic zero or when p>μ. Thus Dμ(I)x=OX,x; the case j=0 is immediate since Ix=OX,x. Conversely, if Dμ(I)x=OX,x, at least one of its local generators ∂αf is a unit, with f∈Ix and ∣α∣≤μ. Since differentiation lowers order by at most ∣α∣, ord⁡x(f)≤∣α∣≤μ. This proves the equivalence stalkwise.

Remarks

Perfection is essential to the positive-characteristic converse: for K=Fp(a), f=xp−a on AK1 has order one at the closed point (f), but every ordinary K-derivative of f vanishes. Thus D(f)=(f) and the marking-one maximal-order criterion fails even though 1<p. The all-characteristic forward inclusion above remains valid. Closedness over imperfect fields is not established by this proof or used by the characteristic-zero development.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

68 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources