How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Canonical resolutions over non-algebraically-closed ground fields
Statement
Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice).
Let be a field of characteristic zero, an algebraic closure (An algebraically closed field: every nonconstant polynomial has a root in the field), a smooth -scheme of finite type and a marked ideal on with and not identically zero on any irreducible component (Marked ideals and their support). Then admits a canonical resolution over : base changing to and taking the canonical resolution of gives a -equivariant resolution, where denotes the automorphisms fixing , which descends to a resolution of over . This resolution commutes with smooth morphisms and, for mark-one inputs with empty boundary, has the ambient-embedding comparison of Canonical resolutions commute with embeddings of ambient smooth schemes, and is natural under isomorphisms of the ground field.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A marked ideal with and generic nonvanishing on every component of a smooth finite-type -scheme , with of characteristic zero, an algebraic closure of , the base change over , and the Galois group .
The Axiom of Choice: AC is assumed for the canonical-resolution consumer clauses and their cited AC-dependent construction suppliers.
Canonical resolution of marked ideals: over the algebraically closed field the marked ideal admits a canonical resolution with invariants satisfying the conditions of Canonical resolutions with invariants of a marked ideal.
Canonical resolution under isomorphisms of the ground field: the canonical resolution is natural under semilinear isomorphisms of the ground field and schemes; for every , the induced semilinear automorphism of transports the canonical resolution of to that of its pullback, which equals the same marked ideal because the original data are defined over . Thus acts on the canonical resolution.
For a -stable ideal on , the finite-dimensional argument in step 2.1 below proves ideal descent. No quasi-coherent sheaf-descent theorem is inferred from the definitions of fields or Galois groups.
Canonical resolutions commute with smooth morphisms, Canonical resolutions commute with embeddings of ambient smooth schemes: the canonical resolution over commutes with smooth morphisms; the closed-ambient-embedding comparison applies to the mark-one empty-boundary inputs of the cited embedding lemma.
Galois fixed points recover finite-dimensional scalar extensions: a finite-dimensional semilinear space over a finite Galois extension is -spanned by its invariant vectors; for the canonical scalar extension of a finite-dimensional -space, the fixed vectors are exactly that -space.
Assuming Choice, a base-field embedding extends across every algebraic extension: under AC each automorphism of a finite Galois subextension of extends to a -automorphism of . The extension embedding is onto because its image is algebraically closed and is algebraic over that image.
Field tests for geometric regularity, clause (3), and Locally standard smooth iff flat with geometrically regular fibres, field case: a finite-type -algebra whose extension to is geometrically regular is geometrically regular, hence smooth over .
Proof
Galois equivariance. The positive marking is unchanged by base change, and generic nonvanishing persists: the field extension is flat, and each generic point of a component of lies over a generic point of a component of , where is the unit ideal. Thus the base-changed marked ideal satisfies the proposition's hypotheses. By [F2] each maps the canonical resolution with its centers to the canonical resolution of the same marked ideal; by uniqueness of the canonical resolution (its invariants are intrinsic) this conjugate resolution agrees with the original one, so the centers and the invariant strata are -stable.
Prove descent on an affine defined over , with ideal of the invariant center. For choose a finite-dimensional -subspace containing its finitely many coefficient vectors, and a finite Galois subextension containing its scalar coefficients (adjoin the finitely many roots of their minimal polynomials). The space is stable under by [F6]. By [F5], is an -linear combination of vectors in . These invariant vectors belong to , so . The ideal is finitely generated because is Noetherian. Intersections with commute with localization: if a localized class lies in the extended ideal, some power of its denominator multiplies its numerator into that ideal and hence into . Thus these affine ideals glue uniquely. By [F7] their quotient rings define smooth centers whose scalar extensions are the original .
The resolution over . The blowup construction commutes with the faithfully flat base change (Flat base change for blowups, and failure without flatness), so the sequence over base changes to ; by construction the supports satisfy by the derivative-support equality in characteristic zero, since derivative ideals commute with separable algebraic scalar extension; at the last stage both are empty, hence over and the sequence is a resolution of over . The closed superlevels of and the lexicographic pairs and are -stable by step 1.1 and descend by the same ideal argument in step 2.1. Their finite ranges reconstruct unique functions over : finite differences of primary superlevels determine , and restricting the descended pair thresholds to this stratum gives its auxiliary superlevels. These sets determine each auxiliary value, are relatively closed on that stratum, and pull back to the original level sets. The descended primary and pair superlevels are closed, preserving the center maxima and every pointwise descent comparison. Thus the resolution is canonical, determined by the intrinsic resolution over ; and it commutes with smooth morphisms and embeddings over by applying [F4] after base change to and descending the equal center ideals by step 2.1. The blowups and their natural comparison maps are then defined over by their Rees-algebra constructions. SNC of the boundary and center descends as well: the individual divisors and their intersection quotients are smooth after scalar extension, and the exact codimensions are preserved by field extension, giving the strict normal crossings criterion (Stacks, tag 0BIA).
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Canonical resolutions with invariants of a marked ideal
- An algebraically closed field: every nonconstant polynomial has a root in the field
- Closed immersions of schemes
- Equivalence of marked ideals
- Étale morphism of schemes
- Field extensions, generated subrings $F[S]$, generated subfields $F(S)$, and simple extensions
- Finite Galois extensions and $\operatorname{Gal}(K/F)$
- Marked ideals and their support
- Smooth morphism of schemes
- Canonical resolutions commute with embeddings of ambient smooth schemes
- Canonical resolutions commute with smooth morphisms
- Canonical resolution under isomorphisms of the ground field
- Canonical resolution of marked ideals
- A field's prime subfield is isomorphic to $\mathbb Q$ in characteristic zero and to $\mathbb F_p$ in characteristic $p$
- Galois fixed points recover finite-dimensional scalar extensions
- Assuming Choice, a base-field embedding extends across every algebraic extension
- Field tests for geometric regularity
- Locally standard smooth iff flat with geometrically regular fibres
- Flat base change for blowups, and failure without flatness
- Iterated derivative ideals preserve support in the safe characteristic range
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
142 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.