How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Canonical principalization of ideals in characteristic zero
Statement
Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice).
Let be a field of characteristic zero, a smooth -scheme of finite type and a coherent ideal sheaf that is not identically zero on any irreducible component of (Coherent module sheaves). Then there is a canonical principalization of : a sequence of blowups of regular centers (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf) such that (a) the exceptional divisor of the composite has only simple normal crossings and has SNC with (Simple normal crossings divisors and simultaneous normal crossings position); (b) the total transform is the ideal of an effective Cartier divisor with simple normal crossings support which is a natural combination of the irreducible components of . The morphism commutes with smooth morphisms and with embeddings of ambient smooth schemes, and is equivariant under every group action on preserving (not necessarily preserving ).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field of characteristic zero, a smooth finite-type -scheme , and a coherent ideal sheaf that is not identically zero on any irreducible component of .
The Axiom of Choice: AC is assumed for the canonical-resolution consumer clauses and their cited AC-dependent construction suppliers.
Canonical resolution of marked ideals, Canonical resolutions over non-algebraically-closed ground fields: on each of the finitely many disjoint open-and-closed pure-dimensional components of the smooth , the marked ideal admits a canonical resolution , a sequence of blowups of regular centers with SNC with the successive exceptional divisors, over .
Multiple test blow-ups, controlled transforms and resolutions of marked ideals, Exceptional subscheme of a blowup: the controlled transform is ; a controlled transform with empty support is the unit ideal, since a sheaf of ideals with nowhere-vanishing stalks is .
Canonical resolutions commute with smooth morphisms, Canonical resolutions commute with embeddings of ambient smooth schemes, Canonical resolution under isomorphisms of the ground field: within finite-type smooth ambient schemes, the marked-ideal construction commutes locally with smooth morphisms of constant relative dimension and with ambient embeddings; decomposing into the open relative-dimension loci gives the general smooth comparison, and with semilinear isomorphisms carrying the input ideal to its pullback.
Simple normal crossings divisors and simultaneous normal crossings position, Blowups of finite type ideals are locally H-projective, and proper, Proper morphisms: blowups of regular centers are proper; strict transforms of exceptional divisors together with the new exceptional divisor form a family in simultaneous SNC position along the process.
Noether normalisation yields module finiteness over a polynomial subring, In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal, A field finitely generated as a k-algebra is a finite extension of k, Lying over for integral ring maps: under AC a finite-type domain is finite over a polynomial subring; a nonzero finite-type algebra over a field has a maximal ideal with finite residue extension; integral inclusions satisfy lying over.
Proof
Principalization from the resolution. Let be the canonical resolution of from [F1] and let be the controlled transforms. Since , the ideal is the unit ideal by [F2]; unwinding the transform rule we get at each step, so the total transform is a product of powers of the exceptional divisors and their strict transforms, each a component of by [F4]. Hence is the ideal of an effective Cartier divisor with SNC support which is a natural combination of the irreducible components of , and by [F4] both the exceptional divisors and the centers are in SNC position: clauses (a) and (b).
Intrinsic constants on a component. For an integral open-and-closed component of , put and let be its elements algebraic over . The minimal polynomial expresses the inverse of each nonzero such element as a polynomial in it, so is a field. On an affine chart , [F5] makes finite over a polynomial ring . Every finite subextension gives a subfield of , so is bounded by the module-generator count; choosing a maximal degree proves finite, hence separable. Any field subring of must lie in : if it contains transcendental over , every , , is a unit. By [F5], the nonzero finite-type -algebra has a finite residue field . Images of finitely many generators of become integral over after clearing finitely many denominators, with . The algebra is integral over and receives a map from . Choose with ; lying over supplies a prime containing in , contradicting its being the image of a unit of . Thus is the unique largest field subring of . Scheme automorphisms, including those permuting components, consequently induce isomorphisms of these intrinsic fields.
Canonicity and smooth naturality. The resolution, hence the principalization, is determined by its canonical invariant centers. The smooth and ambient-embedding comparisons in [F3] transport these centers and the controlled-transform rules, so they transport the total-transform factorization from step 1.1 as well. This proves canonicity and both commutation clauses.
Equivariance for ideal-preserving actions. Regard each component as an -scheme. A smooth affine -ambient presentation is smooth over because is finite separable. Every -derivation annihilates by its separable minimal polynomials, so the - and -derivative ideals agree; orders, boundary strata, homogenizations, coefficient ideals and companion ideals then agree, giving the same canonical sequence. An automorphism preserving transports the componentwise marked ideals by a semilinear isomorphism of their intrinsic constant fields. By [F3] it therefore transports each canonical center, and lifts successively to the blowups. These lifts satisfy identity and composition: the blowup lifts induced from the ideal identifications are natural, and equivalently two lifts agree on the dense complement of the centers and hence on the reduced separated smooth resolution. Thus any ideal-preserving abstract group action lifts coherently, including actions not preserving .
Depends on
- Lying over for integral ring maps
- In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal
- A field finitely generated as a k-algebra is a finite extension of k
- Noether normalisation yields module finiteness over a polynomial subring
- The Axiom of Choice
- Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf
- Closed immersions of schemes
- Coherent module sheaves
- Equivalence of marked ideals
- Exceptional subscheme of a blowup
- Integral schemes
- Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor
- Marked ideals and their support
- Multiple test blow-ups, controlled transforms and resolutions of marked ideals
- Proper morphisms
- Simple normal crossings divisors and simultaneous normal crossings position
- Smooth morphism of schemes
- Strict transform of a closed subscheme
- Canonical resolutions commute with embeddings of ambient smooth schemes
- Canonical resolutions commute with smooth morphisms
- Canonical resolutions over non-algebraically-closed ground fields
- Canonical resolution under isomorphisms of the ground field
- Canonical resolution of marked ideals
- Blowups of finite type ideals are locally H-projective, and proper
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
138 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jaroslaw Wlodarczyk, Simple Hironaka resolution in characteristic zero, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 18 (2005) 779-822; author's arXiv version math/0401401 (28 pp., dated October 25, 2018) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Herwig Hauser, The Hironaka theorem on resolution of singularities (or: A proof we always wanted to understand), Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 40 (2003) 323-403 (standard reference, not scraped)