Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Canonical principalization of ideals in characteristic zero

Statement

Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice).

Let K be a field of characteristic zero, X a smooth K-scheme of finite type and I⊆OX a coherent ideal sheaf that is not identically zero on any irreducible component of X (Coherent module sheaves). Then there is a canonical principalization of I: a sequence X=X0←X1←⋯←Xr=X~ of blowups of regular centers Ci−1⊆Xi−1 (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf) such that (a) the exceptional divisor Ei of the composite σi ⁣:Xi→X has only simple normal crossings and Ci−1 has SNC with Ei−1 (Simple normal crossings divisors and simultaneous normal crossings position); (b) the total transform σr∗I is the ideal of an effective Cartier divisor with simple normal crossings support E~ which is a natural combination of the irreducible components of Er. The morphism (X~,σr∗I)→(X,I) commutes with smooth morphisms and with embeddings of ambient smooth schemes, and is equivariant under every group action on X preserving I (not necessarily preserving K).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field K of characteristic zero, a smooth finite-type K-scheme X, and a coherent ideal sheaf I⊆OX that is not identically zero on any irreducible component of X.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: AC is assumed for the canonical-resolution consumer clauses and their cited AC-dependent construction suppliers.

[F1]

Canonical resolution of marked ideals, Canonical resolutions over non-algebraically-closed ground fields: on each of the finitely many disjoint open-and-closed pure-dimensional components of the smooth X, the marked ideal (I,∅,1) admits a canonical resolution σ ⁣:X~→X, a sequence of blowups of regular centers with SNC with the successive exceptional divisors, over K.

[F2]

Multiple test blow-ups, controlled transforms and resolutions of marked ideals, Exceptional subscheme of a blowup: the controlled transform is Ii=I(Di)−1σi∗Ii−1; a controlled transform with empty support is the unit ideal, since a sheaf of ideals with nowhere-vanishing stalks is O.

[F3]

Canonical resolutions commute with smooth morphisms, Canonical resolutions commute with embeddings of ambient smooth schemes, Canonical resolution under isomorphisms of the ground field: within finite-type smooth ambient schemes, the marked-ideal construction commutes locally with smooth morphisms of constant relative dimension and with ambient embeddings; decomposing into the open relative-dimension loci gives the general smooth comparison, and with semilinear isomorphisms carrying the input ideal to its pullback.

[F4]

Simple normal crossings divisors and simultaneous normal crossings position, Blowups of finite type ideals are locally H-projective, and proper, Proper morphisms: blowups of regular centers are proper; strict transforms of exceptional divisors together with the new exceptional divisor form a family in simultaneous SNC position along the process.

[F5]

Noether normalisation yields module finiteness over a polynomial subring, In a nonzero commutative ring, every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal, A field finitely generated as a k-algebra is a finite extension of k, Lying over for integral ring maps: under AC a finite-type domain is finite over a polynomial subring; a nonzero finite-type algebra over a field has a maximal ideal with finite residue extension; integral inclusions satisfy lying over.

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F4

Principalization from the resolution. Let (Xi)0≤i≤r be the canonical resolution of (I,∅,1) from [F1] and let (Ii,1) be the controlled transforms. Since supp⁡(Ir,1)=∅, the ideal Ir is the unit ideal by [F2]; unwinding the transform rule we get σi∗Ii−1=I(Di)Ii at each step, so the total transform σr∗I is a product of powers of the exceptional divisors Di and their strict transforms, each a component of Er by [F4]. Hence σr∗I is the ideal of an effective Cartier divisor E~ with SNC support which is a natural combination of the irreducible components of Er, and by [F4] both the exceptional divisors and the centers are in SNC position: clauses (a) and (b).

1.2A1F5givenalgebrachoose

Intrinsic constants on a component. For an integral open-and-closed component Z of X, put R=Γ(Z,OZ) and let L be its elements algebraic over K. The minimal polynomial expresses the inverse of each nonzero such element as a polynomial in it, so L is a field. On an affine chart Spec⁡A⊆Z, [F5] makes A finite over a polynomial ring K[z]. Every finite subextension L0/K gives a subfield L0(z) of A⊗K[z]K(z), so [L0:K] is bounded by the module-generator count; choosing a maximal degree proves L/K finite, hence separable. Any field subring of R must lie in L: if it contains f transcendental over K, every f−q, q∈Q, is a unit. By [F5], the nonzero finite-type K(f)-algebra A⊗K[f]K(f) has a finite residue field E/K(f). Images bi of finitely many generators of A become integral over K[f,1/p] after clearing finitely many denominators, with p≠0. The algebra B=K[f,1/p,b1,…,bs] is integral over K[f,1/p] and receives a map from A. Choose q∈Q with p(q)≠0; lying over supplies a prime containing f−q in B, contradicting its being the image of a unit of A. Thus L is the unique largest field subring of R. Scheme automorphisms, including those permuting components, consequently induce isomorphisms of these intrinsic fields.

2.1A1F1F3step 1.1

Canonicity and smooth naturality. The resolution, hence the principalization, is determined by its canonical invariant centers. The smooth and ambient-embedding comparisons in [F3] transport these centers and the controlled-transform rules, so they transport the total-transform factorization from step 1.1 as well. This proves canonicity and both commutation clauses.

3.1A1F1F3step 1.1step 2.1step 1.2∎

Equivariance for ideal-preserving actions. Regard each component as an L-scheme. A smooth affine L-ambient presentation is smooth over K because L/K is finite separable. Every K-derivation annihilates L by its separable minimal polynomials, so the K- and L-derivative ideals agree; orders, boundary strata, homogenizations, coefficient ideals and companion ideals then agree, giving the same canonical sequence. An automorphism preserving I transports the componentwise marked ideals by a semilinear isomorphism of their intrinsic constant fields. By [F3] it therefore transports each canonical center, and lifts successively to the blowups. These lifts satisfy identity and composition: the blowup lifts induced from the ideal identifications are natural, and equivalently two lifts agree on the dense complement of the centers and hence on the reduced separated smooth resolution. Thus any ideal-preserving abstract group action lifts coherently, including actions not preserving K.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

138 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources