How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Multiple test blow-ups, controlled transforms and resolutions of marked ideals
Definition
Let be a marked ideal on the smooth -scheme (Marked ideals and their support). A multiple test blow-up of is a finite sequence in which each is specified either as an inserted isomorphism step or as the blowup (Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf) of at a regular closed subscheme (Closed immersions of schemes) that has SNC with , together with the marked ideals defined inductively for a blowup step by where is the exceptional divisor (Exceptional subscheme of a blowup), is its invertible ideal (Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor), its -th tensor power (Invertible sheaves, Tensor product of sheaves of modules), and is the family of strict transforms (Strict transform of a closed subscheme) ordered so that all old members precede . Empty members of the transformed boundary are omitted, with the order of all surviving labels retained. The transform is the controlled transform of ; for a local section with local equation of the section is a controlled transform of , well defined up to a unit. A blowup step retains the specified center and , even when its underlying morphism is an isomorphism, as for a Cartier center. An inserted isomorphism step has empty , transports the ideal and ordered boundary, and appends no boundary member. A resolution of is a multiple test blow-up with . An extension of a multiple test blow-up is a multiple test blow-up with , indices and isomorphisms forming an identification ; the extended sequence is obtained from the original one by inserting isomorphisms, with every original blow-up retained in its original order. No new nontrivial blow-ups are inserted. This is the extension convention of the source, Definition 2.1.5.
Depends on
- Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf
- Closed immersions of schemes
- Exceptional subscheme of a blowup
- Invertible sheaves
- Invertible sheaf of cartier divisor
- Marked ideals and their support
- Tensor product of sheaves of modules
- Simple normal crossings divisors and simultaneous normal crossings position
- Strict transform of a closed subscheme
Used by
- The maximal-contact mechanism fails in positive characteristic Counterexample
- Canonical resolutions with invariants of a marked ideal Definition
- Equivalence of marked ideals Definition
- Addition and multiplication of marked ideals Lemma
- Canonical resolution under isomorphisms of the ground field Lemma
- Canonical resolutions commute with smooth morphisms Lemma
- Codimension-one components of a maximal-order support Lemma
- Coefficient-ideal control with centres allowed off the subvariety Lemma
- Controlled derivative transforms are contained in derivatives of the controlled transform Lemma
- Controlled transforms are well defined Lemma
- Controlled transforms preserve maximal order on nonempty transformed schemes Lemma
- Derivative ideals under a multiple test blow-up Lemma
- Etale commutativity of the companion-ideal step Lemma
- Etale commutativity of the maximal-order resolution step Lemma
- Giraud's tangent-direction lemma Lemma
- Glueing of homogenized ideals along etale neighbourhoods Lemma
- Refined maximal-contact statement via the coefficient ideal Lemma
- Restriction of a marked ideal to a smooth subvariety and its blow-ups Lemma
- Smooth base change of multiple test blow-ups Lemma
- The coefficient ideal controls the support after restriction Lemma
- The coefficient ideal is equivalent to the marked ideal Lemma
- The homogenized ideal is equivalent to the marked ideal Lemma
- The supports of a multiple test blow-up stay inside the strict transforms of a hypersurface of maximal contact Lemma
- Canonical resolution of marked ideals Proposition
- Bravo-Villamayor strengthening of embedded desingularization Theorem
- Canonical principalization of ideals in characteristic zero Theorem
- Weak embedded desingularization in characteristic zero Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jaroslaw Wlodarczyk, Simple Hironaka resolution in characteristic zero, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 18 (2005) 779-822; author's arXiv version math/0401401 (28 pp., dated October 25, 2018) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Herwig Hauser, The Hironaka theorem on resolution of singularities (or: A proof we always wanted to understand), Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 40 (2003) 323-403 (standard reference, not scraped)