Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The coefficient ideal controls the support after restriction

Statement

Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice), μ≥1, and either char⁡K=0 or K perfect with char⁡K=p>μ (Field). Let (I,E,μ) be a marked ideal of maximal order on the smooth K-scheme X and let S⊆X be a regular closed subscheme with SNC with E and not contained in supp⁡(I,μ) (Marked ideals and their support). Then supp⁡(I,μ)∩S=supp⁡(C(I,μ)∣S) (the restriction of the coefficient ideal, The coefficient ideal of a marked ideal of maximal order). Moreover, if (Xi) is a multiple test blow-up of (I,μ) whose centers Ci are contained in the strict transforms Si of S (or disjoint from them), then the restrictions σi∣Si define a multiple test blow-up (Si) of C(I,μ)∣S, and supp⁡(Ii,μ)∩Si=supp⁡[C(I,μ)∣S]i; conversely every multiple test blow-up of C(I,μ)∣S is induced by one of (I,μ) with centers in the strict transforms of S.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume AC. Let K be a field, let μ≥1 with char⁡K=0 or K perfect with char⁡K=p>μ, let (I,E,μ) be a maximal-order marked ideal whose support does not contain a regular closed subscheme S⊆X having SNC with E, and let (Xi) be a multiple test blow-up with centers contained in the strict transforms Si of S.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: AC is used through the coefficient-equivalence and marked-sum support suppliers [F1] and [F2].

[F1]

The coefficient ideal of a marked ideal of maximal order: C(I,μ)=∑i=0μ−1(Di(I),μ−i); by Addition and multiplication of marked ideals this is the sum operation, so its support is the intersection of the summands' supports and its controlled transforms are the sums of the controlled transforms.

[F2]
[F3]

Restriction of a marked ideal to a smooth subvariety and its blow-ups: supp⁡(I,μ)∩S⊆supp⁡((I,μ)∣S) and, along a multiple test blow-up with centers in the Si, [(I,μ)∣S]i=(Ii,μ)∣Si and σc((Ii,μ)∣Si)=(σc(Ii,μ))∣Si+1.

[F4]

Order of an ideal sheaf at a point, Derivative ideals of an ideal sheaf and of a marked ideal: in local coordinates x1,…,xk defining S and y1,…,yn−k along it, a local section f=∑αcαf(y)xα has cαf∣S=1α!∂αf∣S∈D∣α∣(I)∣S; hence x∈supp⁡(I,μ)∩S if and only if ord⁡x(cαf∣S)≥μ−∣α∣ for all f and all ∣α∣≤μ.

[F5]

Taylor expansions can be taken after faithful flat completion using the regular-local completed-parameter construction in Iterated derivative ideals preserve support in the safe characteristic range, [F4]. The coefficients of transverse degree ∣α∣<μ are ∂xαf/α! restricted to S, so they belong to D∣α∣(I)∣S. Only factorials with ∣α∣<μ<p occur in positive characteristic.

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F3F4

The two inclusions at the initial stage. The inclusion supp⁡(I,μ)∩S=supp⁡(C(I,μ))∩S⊆supp⁡(C(I,μ)∣S) is [F2, F3]; note that the summands of C(I,μ) have supports containing supp⁡(I,μ), and the restriction can only raise orders. Conversely, if x∈supp⁡(C(I,μ)∣S), then ord⁡x(Di(I)∣S)≥μ−i for all i≤μ−1, so in the notation of [F4] every coefficient cαf∣S has order at least μ−∣α∣; reading the Taylor development of f along S gives ord⁡x(f)≥μ for every local section, i.e. x∈supp⁡(I,μ)∩S. Hence the supports agree.

2.1A1F1F2F3F4F5step 1.1algebra

Track the coefficients of the original generators throughout the sequence. Let Jr,i be the transform on Si of (Dr(I)∣S,μ−r), and write a transformed generator as fi=∑αcα,ixiα in completed adapted coordinates. Initially cα,0∈J∣α∣,0 by [F5]. In a nonempty restricted blowup chart with exceptional equation a, xi+1=xi/a and fi+1=a−μσ∗fi, hence cα,i+1=a−(μ−∣α∣)σ∗cα,i. This is exactly the transform with mark μ−∣α∣, so the coefficient membership persists. At each stage keep the normal generators xi fixed while adapting the center by a change of parameters along Si in the completed coefficient ring. This is possible because the center is a regular subscheme of Si. Such a change transports the coefficient ideals and does not alter the stated membership; no change mixing normal and tangent parameters is needed. A point in the support of the transformed coefficient sum lies in every Jr,i support by [F1]; the persistent coefficient membership therefore gives ord⁡(cα,i)≥μ−∣α∣, and the Taylor expansion gives ord⁡(fi)≥μ. This proves the inclusion from restricted coefficient support to ambient support. Conversely, [F2] gives equality of ambient supports for the transformed C(I,μ) and I; restriction raises order by [F3], so ambient support on Si lies in the restricted coefficient support.

3.1A1F3F4step 2.1∎

The converse direction. Conversely, let (Si) be a multiple test blow-up of C(I,μ)∣S with centers Di⊆Si. Lifting the center Di to Xi and blowing up Xi there is legitimate because Di⊆supp⁡[C(I,μ)∣S]i=supp⁡(Ii,μ)∩Si⊆supp⁡(Ii,μ) by step 2.1, and its SNC position with the restricted boundary, together with the parameter equations defining Si, makes it SNC with the ambient boundary under the omission convention of [F3]; the blow-up of Xi at Di restricts to the blow-up of Si at Di along the strict transform, and the chart computation of [F4] read in this direction shows that the equality of supports of step 2.1 persists at every stage. Hence (Si) defines a multiple test blow-up (Xi) of (I,μ) with all centers contained in the strict transforms of S, which is clause (3).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

51 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources