How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The coefficient ideal controls the support after restriction
Statement
Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice), , and either or perfect with (Field). Let be a marked ideal of maximal order on the smooth -scheme and let be a regular closed subscheme with SNC with and not contained in (Marked ideals and their support). Then (the restriction of the coefficient ideal, The coefficient ideal of a marked ideal of maximal order). Moreover, if is a multiple test blow-up of whose centers are contained in the strict transforms of (or disjoint from them), then the restrictions define a multiple test blow-up of , and conversely every multiple test blow-up of is induced by one of with centers in the strict transforms of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume AC. Let be a field, let with or perfect with , let be a maximal-order marked ideal whose support does not contain a regular closed subscheme having SNC with , and let be a multiple test blow-up with centers contained in the strict transforms of .
The Axiom of Choice: AC is used through the coefficient-equivalence and marked-sum support suppliers [F1] and [F2].
The coefficient ideal of a marked ideal of maximal order: ; by Addition and multiplication of marked ideals this is the sum operation, so its support is the intersection of the summands' supports and its controlled transforms are the sums of the controlled transforms.
Restriction of a marked ideal to a smooth subvariety and its blow-ups: and, along a multiple test blow-up with centers in the , and .
Order of an ideal sheaf at a point, Derivative ideals of an ideal sheaf and of a marked ideal: in local coordinates defining and along it, a local section has ; hence if and only if for all and all .
Taylor expansions can be taken after faithful flat completion using the regular-local completed-parameter construction in Iterated derivative ideals preserve support in the safe characteristic range, [F4]. The coefficients of transverse degree are restricted to , so they belong to . Only factorials with occur in positive characteristic.
Proof
The two inclusions at the initial stage. The inclusion is [F2, F3]; note that the summands of have supports containing , and the restriction can only raise orders. Conversely, if , then for all , so in the notation of [F4] every coefficient has order at least ; reading the Taylor development of along gives for every local section, i.e. . Hence the supports agree.
Track the coefficients of the original generators throughout the sequence. Let be the transform on of , and write a transformed generator as in completed adapted coordinates. Initially by [F5]. In a nonempty restricted blowup chart with exceptional equation , and , hence . This is exactly the transform with mark , so the coefficient membership persists. At each stage keep the normal generators fixed while adapting the center by a change of parameters along in the completed coefficient ring. This is possible because the center is a regular subscheme of . Such a change transports the coefficient ideals and does not alter the stated membership; no change mixing normal and tangent parameters is needed. A point in the support of the transformed coefficient sum lies in every support by [F1]; the persistent coefficient membership therefore gives , and the Taylor expansion gives . This proves the inclusion from restricted coefficient support to ambient support. Conversely, [F2] gives equality of ambient supports for the transformed and ; restriction raises order by [F3], so ambient support on lies in the restricted coefficient support.
The converse direction. Conversely, let be a multiple test blow-up of with centers . Lifting the center to and blowing up there is legitimate because by step 2.1, and its SNC position with the restricted boundary, together with the parameter equations defining , makes it SNC with the ambient boundary under the omission convention of [F3]; the blow-up of at restricts to the blow-up of at along the strict transform, and the chart computation of [F4] read in this direction shows that the equality of supports of step 2.1 persists at every stage. Hence defines a multiple test blow-up of with all centers contained in the strict transforms of , which is clause (3).
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- The coefficient ideal of a marked ideal of maximal order
- Field
- Derivative ideals of an ideal sheaf and of a marked ideal
- Marked ideals and their support
- Multiple test blow-ups, controlled transforms and resolutions of marked ideals
- Order of an ideal sheaf at a point
- Addition and multiplication of marked ideals
- The coefficient ideal is equivalent to the marked ideal
- Restriction of a marked ideal to a smooth subvariety and its blow-ups
- Iterated derivative ideals preserve support in the safe characteristic range
Used by
- Coefficient-ideal control with centres allowed off the subvariety Lemma
- Etale commutativity of the maximal-order resolution step Lemma
- Refined maximal-contact statement via the coefficient ideal Lemma
- Canonical resolution of marked ideals Proposition
- Bravo-Villamayor strengthening of embedded desingularization Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
51 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.