How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Controlled derivative transforms are contained in derivatives of the controlled transform
Statement
Let be a marked ideal on a smooth -scheme, a regular center with SNC with , the blowup with exceptional divisor , and (Multiple test blow-ups, controlled transforms and resolutions of marked ideals). Then i.e. the controlled transform of the -th derivative ideal is contained in the -th derivative ideal of the controlled transform (Derivative ideals of an ideal sheaf and of a marked ideal).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A marked ideal on a smooth -scheme , a regular center with SNC with , the blowup with exceptional divisor and local equation , and .
Derivative ideals of an ideal sheaf and of a marked ideal: is generated by the local sections of and their first derivatives with respect to local coordinates; equivalently by the sections together with for -derivations of ; is the iterate and .
Multiple test blow-ups, controlled transforms and resolutions of marked ideals, Controlled transforms are well defined: the controlled transform is , computed by on sections; it is an ideal sheaf, well defined up to units.
embedding dimension and regular local ring, Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf: at a point of choose local parameters with described by and ; the corresponding chart of the blowup has coordinates , , .
Derivation of an algebra, Derivations are maps out of Ω: the -derivations of the structure sheaf form a locally free sheaf; a derivation is determined by its values on local coordinates, and for a derivation on acts on by .
Iterated derivative ideals preserve support in the safe characteristic range: for , in every characteristic, so the center hypothesis transfers to the lower derivative ideal.
Proof
Use the adapted blowup coordinates of [F3]. The chain rule gives for each coordinate derivation on , and is regular: for normal directions different from the chart index , for the chart-index direction , and for the tangent directions . Linear combinations have the same properties.
Put . For a generator , write with . Leibniz gives . The undifferentiated generator of transforms to . These two calculations, including the original ideal generators, prove . No division by the characteristic is used.
The case is equality. For , [F5] makes the center admissible for . Apply step 2.1 to this marked ideal and then use monotonicity of and the induction hypothesis: . This completes the induction.
Depends on
- Derivations are maps out of Ω
- Blowup of a scheme along an ideal sheaf
- Derivation of an algebra
- embedding dimension and regular local ring
- Derivative ideals of an ideal sheaf and of a marked ideal
- Multiple test blow-ups, controlled transforms and resolutions of marked ideals
- Controlled transforms are well defined
- Iterated derivative ideals preserve support in the safe characteristic range
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.