How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Poisson periodization of a normalized Gaussian on a full-rank lattice
Statement
Assume Countable Choice and use the full-rank cell and angular frequencies of Neutral point sources and Fourier data on a three-dimensional torus. Here denotes the Schwartz space of smooth functions whose derivatives decay faster than every inverse polynomial. For let For every the two series below converge absolutely, locally uniformly in , and The lattice Poisson theorem is applied only to this Schwartz Gaussian; it is not applied to a compactly supported or finite-smoothness assignment window.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, an invertible cell matrix , , , , , , and .
Countable Choice is required by the published lattice Poisson theorem and the Gaussian transform supplier (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
For , both lattice series converge absolutely and the periodization satisfies under Countable Choice (Poisson summation for a full-rank lattice).
With , for under Countable Choice (Euclidean Gaussian transform with the 2π normalization).
The normalized Gaussian in the screened-kernel definition is (Gaussian screened Coulomb kernel and its self limit).
The lattice is , its dual is , and the physical angular frequency for index is (Neutral point sources and Fourier data on a three-dimensional torus).
Proof
Put . By [F2], the Fourier transform of is . Multiplying the input by cancels , so Each derivative of is a polynomial times . For every degree and integer , choose an integer ; the inequality for bounds on , and continuity bounds it on the unit ball. Hence , so [F1] applies.
Fix a compact set and choose with on . Since is invertible, for . For , uniformly on , so with . This majorant is summable: , since for . The remaining finitely many indices have bounded terms. Bounding every series tail by the corresponding majorant tail proves absolute uniform convergence on .
Apply [F1] to . Every has the unique form with ; by [F4], . Therefore and . Substitution in the periodization formula gives exactly the displayed reciprocal series, and [F1] supplies absolute convergence on both sides. At , absolute convergence of the reciprocal series gives . Since , this same sum bounds reciprocal-series tails uniformly in all . Together with step 1.2 this proves both asserted local uniform convergence claims.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lior Silberman, Fourier Series and the Poisson Summation Formula (Math 613 lecture notes) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Hark Lee and Wei Cai, Ewald Summation for Coulomb Interactions in a Periodic Supercell (2009 lecture notes) (standard reference, not scraped)