Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The alpha-independent Ewald potential and renormalized energy

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and neutral finite point-source data (A,V,Λ,κk,(xi,qi)i=1n) from Neutral point sources and Fourier data on a three-dimensional torus, with pairwise distinct source positions in TA. For α>0 put σk=∑iqie−iκk⋅xi,ck(α)=4πV∣κk∣2e−∣κk∣2/(4α2)(k≠0). For every off-source point x∉⋃i(xi+Λ), the absolutely convergent Ewald potential Uα(x)=∑iqi∑λ∈Λerfc⁡(α∣x−xi+λ∣)∣x−xi+λ∣+4πV∑k≠0e−∣κk∣2/(4α2)∣κk∣2σkeiκk⋅x is the off-source representative of the unique mean-zero periodic solution of −Δu=4πρ. Hence it is independent of α.

Define the regular part at xi by FP⁡xiUα=lim⁡x→xi(Uα(x)−qi∣x−xi∣). The limit exists, is independent of α, and the renormalized energy is E=12∑iqiFP⁡xiUα=12∑i∑(j,λ)≠(i,0)qiqjerfc⁡(α∣xi−xj+λ∣)∣xi−xj+λ∣+12∑k≠0ck(α)∣σk∣2−απ∑iqi2. The prime-exclusion written as (j,λ)≠(i,0) omits only each particle's own zero-image singularity.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; an invertible cell matrix A, its covolume V, the lattice Λ, and the angular reciprocal lattice κk; a finite neutral source configuration with pairwise distinct torus positions; and α>0.

[A1]

Countable Choice is used by Gaussian lattice Poisson summation and by the periodic distribution uniqueness interface (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

For ϕs(r)=erfc⁡(αr)/r and gα=α3π−3/2e−α2∣x∣2, −Δϕs=4πδ0−4πgα, and ϕs(r)=r−1−2α/π+O(r2) (Gaussian screened Coulomb kernel and its self limit).

[F2]

The normalized Gaussian periodizes as ∑λ∈Λgα(x+λ)=V−1∑ke−∣κk∣2/(4α2)eiκk⋅x with absolute convergence (Poisson periodization of a normalized Gaussian on a full-rank lattice).

[F3]

The neutral source has a unique mean-zero periodic distribution solution of −Δu=4πρ, with coefficients u^(k)=4πσk/(V∣κk∣2) for k≠0 and zero mode fixed to zero (The mean-zero Fourier distribution solves the neutral periodic Poisson equation).

[F4]

The shell count and finite Gaussian controllers apply to both Λ and the angular reciprocal lattice; Tp(β,M) is finite and has the stated finite upper controller (Uniform lattice-shell counts and explicit Gaussian tail controllers).

[F6]

∫−∞∞e−t2dt=π (The Gaussian integral ∫−∞∞e−x2 dx=π).

[F8]

A nonnegative integral over a product or countable partition may be evaluated by Tonelli's theorem (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F9]

A compact ball contains a nonnegative smooth bump supported in any prescribed larger open ball (A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls).

[F10]

The mean of every nonconstant lattice character on the cell is zero: V−1∫Feiκk⋅x dx=0 for k≠0 (Orthogonality of the lattice characters over a fundamental domain).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenA1F2F4algebra

Write Q=∑i∣qi∣. For α>0 define the periodized Gaussian source γα(x)=∑iqi∑λ∈Λgα(x−xi+λ). By [F2] applied to each translate and then summed over the finite source set, γα(x)=1V∑k∈Z3e−∣κk∣2/(4α2)σkeiκk⋅x. Neutrality gives σ0=0, so the k=0 term vanishes. Both series are absolutely convergent; [F4] supplies uniform Gaussian tails for the lattice sums and their derivatives.

1.2givenF1F4F5F6F7F8F10algebra

Define Sα(x)=∑iqi∑λ∈Λϕs(∣x−xi+λ∣) and Lα(x)=4πV∑k≠0e−∣κk∣2/(4α2)∣κk∣2σkeiκk⋅x. The finitely many nonzero modes with ∣κk∣<1 cause no difficulty, and [F4] bounds the remaining Gaussian shells; with ∣σk∣≤Q, the reciprocal series is absolutely and uniformly convergent. Thus termwise integration over the finite-volume cell is valid, and [F10] gives 1V∫FLα(x) dx=4πV∑k≠0e−∣κk∣2/(4α2)∣κk∣2σk(1V∫Feiκk⋅x dx)=0. For the real part, [F4], [F5], and Tonelli [F8] give ∫F∑λ∈Λϕs(∣x−xi+λ∣) dx=∫R3erfc⁡(α∣y∣)∣y∣ dy=4π∫0∞rerfc⁡(αr) dr=πα2. For the last equality, set s=αr and use the tail identity in [F1]. Tonelli [F8] gives ∫0∞serfc⁡(s)ds=2π∫0∞e−t2(∫0ts ds)dt=1π∫0∞t2e−t2dt. Integration by parts [F7] on [0,R] gives ∫0Rt2e−t2dt=−Re−R2/2+(1/2)∫0Re−t2dt; the boundary term tends to zero since eR2≥R4/2 for R>0. Taking R→∞ and using [F6] yields ∫0∞t2e−t2dt=π/4, so ∫0∞serfc⁡(s)ds=1/4. Multiplying by 4πα−2 gives the displayed value. Hence ∫FSα=(π/α2)∑iqi=0, and Sα+Lα has mean zero.

2.1F1F4step 1.1step 1.2algebra

On compact sets avoiding all source images, the real sum and each differentiated tail converge uniformly by the erfc⁡ bounds of [F1] and the shell controller [F4]. The reciprocal series and every derivative converge uniformly because each derivative adds only a fixed power of ∣κk∣ to a Gaussian tail. Thus both are continuous off-source, periodic, and their Fourier operations below are legitimate.

3.1givenF1F2F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra

The distributional identity in [F1], summed over the locally finite source images, gives −ΔSα=4πρ−4πγα. Absolute tail control from [F4] lets the distribution pairing pass through the image sum. Termwise differentiation of the uniformly convergent reciprocal series for Lα gives −ΔLα=4πV∑k≠0e−∣κk∣2/(4α2)σkeiκk⋅x=4πγα, where the last equality is step 1.1 and σ0=0. Therefore −Δ(Sα+Lα)=4πρ.

4.1A1F3F9step 2.1step 3.1step 1.2

The sum Uα=Sα+Lα is a mean-zero periodic distribution solution by steps 3.1 and 1.2. Uniqueness [F3] makes it equal to the same Fourier distribution u for every α>0. Its absolutely convergent representative is continuous off-source by step 2.1. If two such representatives differed at a point, one real or imaginary component of their difference would keep a strict sign on a small ball; choose a nonnegative smooth bump supported there using [F9]. Their distribution pairings with that bump would differ, contradicting equality to u. Thus the displayed potential is independent of α.

5.1F1F4step 2.1step 4.1algebra∎

Near xi, the unique term with its own zero image is qiϕs(∣x−xi∣). By [F1], subtracting qi/∣x−xi∣ leaves the finite limit −2αqi/π from that term; every other real term is continuous near xi because positions are distinct modulo Λ, and the reciprocal term is smooth. This proves existence and alpha-independence of the regular part by step 4.1. Multiplying those regular parts by qi/2 gives the real-space sum with (j,λ)≠(i,0) and the self contribution −α∑iqi2/π. The reciprocal contribution is 12∑iqiLα(xi)=12∑k≠04πV∣κk∣2e−∣κk∣2/(4α2)(∑iqieiκk⋅xi)(∑jqje−iκk⋅xj)=12∑k≠0ck(α)∣σk∣2. All rearrangements are absolutely convergent by [F4]. This is exactly the stated renormalized energy.

Remarks

  • The cell shape enters through V and κk=2πA−Tk; no cubic-cell assumption is made.
  • Neutrality removes the k=0 obstruction. The theorem fixes the mean-zero convention and includes no surface term for another boundary convention.
  • The real-space potential is singular at source images. The reciprocal series is smooth; any uniform field or potential error for the point-source model must exclude collisions or state a regularized source norm.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

65 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources