Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Explicit real and reciprocal Ewald potential, energy, and force tail bounds

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and the neutral finite configuration and full-rank cell of Neutral point sources and Fourier data on a three-dimensional torus. Fix α>0. Let Q=∑i∣qi∣, choose real and reciprocal cutoffs R,K≥1, and put MR=⌊R⌋, MK=⌊K⌋. Let CR=CA be the shell constant for Λ=AZ3 and CK=C2πA−T the shell constant for the angular reciprocal lattice. For the real-space cutoff, retain all (i,j,λ) with ∣xi−xj+λ∣≤R except (i,i,0). For the reciprocal cutoff, retain all k≠0 with ∣κk∣≤K. Use the T3(β,M) controller of Uniform lattice-shell counts and explicit Gaussian tail controllers. Then the omitted tails in the exact Ewald potential, energy, and particle force satisfy BRU=QCRπαT3(α2,MR),BRE=Q2CR2παT3(α2,MR), BRF,i=∣qi∣QCRπ(2α+α−1)T3(α2,MR), and BKU=4πQCKVT3((4α2)−1,MK),BKE=2πQ2CKVT3((4α2)−1,MK), BKF,i=4π∣qi∣QCKVT3((4α2)−1,MK). For a certified finite value, replace each T3 by the corresponding finite upper controller U3. The real force is evaluated only away from collisions; no field bound is asserted at a point source.

The exact force is the negative gradient of the renormalized energy. With rijλ=∣xi−xj+λ∣ and ak(ti)=e−iκk⋅xi, it is Fi=−qi∑j=1n∑λ∈Λ′qjϕs′(rijλ)xi−xj+λrijλ−qi∑k≠0ckRe⁡(σk‾∇xak(ti)). The prime excludes only (j,λ)=(i,0); the absolutely convergent reciprocal sum is real by pairing k and −k.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, a neutral finite source configuration on AZ3, α>0, R,K≥1, and the real/reciprocal Ewald formulas of The alpha-independent Ewald potential and renormalized energy.

[A1]

Countable Choice is part of the Ewald formulas' Gaussian Poisson and periodic distribution prerequisites (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

ϕs(r)=erfc⁡(αr)/r≤e−α2r2/(παr2) and ∣ϕs′(r)∣≤(2α/π)e−α2r2/r+e−α2r2/(παr3) (Gaussian screened Coulomb kernel and its self limit).

[F2]

Every translate of either lattice has at most CB(m+1)3 points in the shell m≤∣x∣<m+1, and the resulting Gaussian-polynomial tail is bounded by T3 or its finite controller U3 (Uniform lattice-shell counts and explicit Gaussian tail controllers).

[F3]

The reciprocal coefficient is ck=4πe−∣κk∣2/(4α2)/(V∣κk∣2) and ∣σk∣≤Q (The alpha-independent Ewald potential and renormalized energy).

[F4]

The off-source potential and renormalized energy have the absolutely convergent Ewald formulas displayed in The alpha-independent Ewald potential and renormalized energy.

[F5]

Continuously differentiable partial sums whose derivatives converge uniformly on a closed interval and whose values converge at one point have a differentiable limit with the termwise derivative (If continuously differentiable functions converge at one point and their derivatives converge uniformly on a closed interval, then the functions converge uniformly to a differentiable function whose derivative is the derivative limit).

[F7]

Uniform limits of continuous real functions are continuous, and a real map with continuous partial derivatives on a neighborhood is totally differentiable (The uniform limit of continuous real-valued functions on a metric space is continuous, If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1A1F1F2F4F5

Fix a collision-free configuration and choose a small closed product of coordinate balls around its source positions, using local torus lifts, that remains collision-free. Finitely many nearby nonself images then stay a positive distance from the singularity. For large real-space shell index m, [F1] bounds the kernel by a constant times e−α2m2 and its first position derivatives by (2α+α−1)e−α2m2/π. [F2] bounds the shell count uniformly over every translate; since the source-difference vectors stay in a bounded set, ∣λ∣→∞ forces the corresponding distance to infinity uniformly. Thus the real energy series and each first-derivative series converge uniformly on this product. Finite partial sums are continuously differentiable and their values converge at one point by [F4]. Under [A1], apply [F5] along each real coordinate line to justify termwise differentiation of the real energy.

1.2A1F2F3F4F5F6

For the reciprocal energy, [F3] gives ∣σk∣≤Q and Gaussian decay of ck, while [F6] gives ∣∇xiσk∣=∣qi∣∣κk∣. The derivative of each summand 12ck∣σk∣2 is bounded by ckQ∣qi∣∣κk∣. All nonzero modes in shells m≥1 therefore have a summable position-uniform majorant C(m+1)3e−m2/(4α2) by [F2]; the remaining bounded ball contains finitely many modes because the reciprocal lattice is full rank. The energy summands themselves are bounded by Q2ck/2, whose shell sum also converges by [F2]–[F3]. Thus the reciprocal energy and all its first-derivative series converge uniformly on the same product. Finite partial sums have values converging at one point by [F4], so [F5] gives their termwise derivatives along every coordinate line.

1.3givenA1F1F2F4algebra

Under Countable Choice [A1], use the Ewald representation [F4]. For r>R, the shell index m is at least MR≥1. By [F1], each omitted real potential term is at most e−α2m2/(παm2). The shell count [F2] and m−2≤1 bound the total image tail for one source by CR(πα)−1T3(α2,MR). Summing ∣qi∣ gives BRU.

1.4givenA1F2F3algebra

For a reciprocal mode in the omitted shell m≤∣κk∣<m+1, with m≥MK≥1, [F3] gives the potential summand bound (4πQ/V)e−m2/(4α2)/m2. Multiply by [F2], use m−2≤1, and sum to obtain BKU. The energy summand is one half the coefficient times ∣σk∣2≤Q2, so the same count yields BKE.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2F7

Each coordinate derivative obtained in steps 1.1–1.2 is a locally uniform limit of continuous finite-sum derivatives, hence is continuous by [F7]. The open collision-free configuration set is a finite-dimensional Euclidean open set in local lifts. Applying the continuous-partials clause of [F7] shows the Ewald energy is totally differentiable there, with the termwise derivatives computed below as its gradient.

2.2step 1.1F1F4F6algebra

In a finite real-space partial sum truncated by the symmetric condition ∣λ∣≤L, differentiating terms with xi in the first position gives one half of qi∑j,λ′qj∇ϕs(∣xi−xj+λ∣). Terms with xi in the second position give −12qi∑j,λ′qj∇ϕs(∣xj−xi+λ∣). By [F6] and the chain rule, ∇ϕs(∣y∣)=ϕs′(∣y∣)y/∣y∣ for y≠0, so this radial vector gradient is odd. Reindexing the second sum by λ↦−λ preserves the finite truncation and the excluded self term, and makes it equal to the first half. Passing to the limit is justified by step 1.1, so the full real energy gradient is qi∑j,λ′qjϕs′(rijλ)(xi−xj+λ)/rijλ.

3.1step 1.2step 2.2F3F4F6algebra

For each reciprocal mode, [F6] gives ∇xiσk=−iqiκkak(ti). In real and imaginary coordinates, ∇∣σk∣2=2Re⁡(σk‾∇σk), so differentiating a finite reciprocal partial energy gives qi∑kckRe⁡(σk‾∇xak(ti)). Step 1.2 justifies passage to the full sum. The constant self term has zero derivative. Negating the real gradient in step 2.2 and this reciprocal gradient gives the force formula in the Statement; opposite reciprocal modes are conjugate pairs, so their sum is real.

3.2givenF1F2step 2.2algebra

The real energy has the factor 1/2 and charge-pair absolute sum at most Q2, so the same shell estimate as in step 1.3 gives BRE. The radial derivative bound [F1] and r≥m≥1 imply ∣ϕs′(r)∣≤(2α+α−1)e−α2m2/π. The real force formula proved in step 2.2, the shell count [F2], and ∣qi∣∑j∣qj∣=∣qi∣Q give exactly BRF,i.

4.1A1step 3.1F2F3F6givenalgebra

By the reciprocal force formula in step 3.1, each omitted reciprocal force mode has magnitude at most (4π∣qi∣Q/V)e−∣κk∣2/(4α2)/∣κk∣, using ∣∇xak∣=∣κk∣ from [F6]. Since ∣κk∣≥m≥1, this is at most (4π∣qi∣Q/V)e−m2/(4α2). The shell count [F2] and sum over m≥MK give BKF,i.

5.1step 1.3step 3.2step 1.4step 4.1F2algebra∎

The shell bounds are uniform in every translate, so no source-position dependence was introduced. Replacing T3 by its finite upper controller preserves each inequality. Adding the real and reciprocal omitted terms by the triangle inequality gives the total Ewald cutoff error for potential, energy, and force.

Remarks

  • The constants CR and CK depend on the cell shape through the two lattice bases. The estimate does not assume a cubic cell.
  • If the reciprocal retained set is not the full ball ∣κk∣≤K, every additional omitted mode, including omitted Nyquist modes, must be included in the reciprocal remainder.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

66 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources