Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Gaussian screened Coulomb kernel and its self limit

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. For α>0, define gα(x)=α3π3/2e−α2∣x∣2,erf⁡(s)=2π∫0se−t2 dt,erfc⁡(s)=1−erf⁡(s). Here Δ=∑j=13∂xj2, δ0 is the distribution ⟨δ0,φ⟩=φ(0), and a test function is a smooth compactly supported function φ. For r=∣x∣>0 put ϕℓ(r)=erf⁡(αr)/r and ϕs(r)=erfc⁡(αr)/r. Then ϕℓ extends continuously to r=0, −Δϕℓ=4πgα distributionally on R3, and −Δϕs=4πδ0−4πgα. Moreover, for every s≥0, erfc⁡(s)=2π∫s∞e−t2 dt, ϕs(r)=1r−2απ+O(r2)(r↓0), and for every r>0, 0≤ϕs(r)≤e−α2r2παr2,∣ϕs′(r)∣≤2απe−α2r2r+e−α2r2παr3.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, α>0, a point x∈R3, r=∣x∣, and an arbitrary φ∈Cc∞(R3).

[A1]

Countable Choice is assumed in the local divergence theorem and its volume interfaces (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The bounded C1 divergence theorem applies to punctured balls and smooth vector fields on their closures (Divergence on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain).

[F3]

∫−∞∞e−t2 dt=π (The Gaussian integral ∫−∞∞e−x2 dx=π).

[F4]

Absolutely integrable products may be integrated by successive coordinates (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F6]

For f∈L1(R), the substitution y=αx gives ∫Rf(y) dy=α∫Rf(αx) dx; its Jacobian is α>0 (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF2F5algebra

By [F2], erf⁡′(s)=2e−s2/π, and [F5] gives h′(r)=2αe−α2r2/π for h(r)=erf⁡(αr). Differentiating again gives h′′(r)=−4α3re−α2r2/π. Since ∣e−s2−1∣=∫0s2e−vdv≤s2, the integral definition yields h(r)=2αr/π+O(r3), and the derivative formula yields h′(r)=2α/π+O(r2). Thus h(r)/r→2α/π and (h′(r)r−h(r))/r2=O(r) as r↓0. For r>0, the radial Laplacian formula Δf(∣x∣)=(rf(r))′′/r follows by differentiating ∂xjf=f′(r)xj/r and summing j=1,2,3. Applying it to f=ϕℓ=h/r gives −Δϕℓ=4α3e−α2r2/π=4πgα away from the origin.

2.1step 1.1A1F1F3F4F6

Let Fε=φ∇ϕℓ−ϕℓ∇φ on the punctured ball BR∖B‾ε, where R is outside the support of φ. The product rule gives div⁡Fε=φΔϕℓ−ϕℓΔφ. By [F1] its integral is the boundary flux. The outer flux is zero; at the inner sphere both ϕℓ and ∇ϕℓ are bounded, and its area is ∫02π∫0πε2sin⁡θ dθdϕ=4πε2, so the flux tends to zero. Taking ε↓0 proves ∫ϕℓ(−Δφ)=∫φ(−Δϕℓ)=4π∫φgα, using step 1.1. By [F3], [F4], and [F6], applied coordinatewise and with y=αx, ∫R3gα=1.

2.2step 1.1F3algebra

Step 1.1 gives erf⁡(αr)=2αr/π+O(r3), so erfc⁡(αr)/r=1/r−2α/π+O(r2). By [F3] and evenness, erfc⁡(s)=(2/π)∫s∞e−t2dt≥0. For s>0, ∫s∞e−t2dt≤s−1∫s∞te−t2dt=e−s2/(2s); multiplying by 2/π gives erfc⁡(s)≤e−s2/(πs). This proves the bound for ϕs.

3.1A1F1step 2.1algebra

On the punctured ball Δ(1/r)=0. Put Gε=φ∇(1/r)−(1/r)∇φ. The product rule gives div⁡Gε=−(1/r)Δφ, so [F1] makes the integral of (1/r)(−Δφ) equal to its boundary flux. The outer flux is zero. The inner outward normal is −x/r, hence ∂n(1/r)=ε−2; the flux is ∫∣x∣=ε(φε−2−(1/ε)∂nφ) dS. Since dS=ε2sin⁡θ dθdϕ, its first term tends to 4πφ(0) and the second is bounded by 4πεsup⁡∣∇φ∣, hence tends to zero. Therefore −Δ(1/r)=4πδ0 distributionally. Subtracting step 2.1 proves −Δϕs=4πδ0−4πgα.

4.1step 2.2algebra∎

Differentiating ϕs for r>0 gives ϕs′(r)=−2αe−α2r2/(πr)−erfc⁡(αr)/r2. Apply step 2.2 with s=αr to its second term to obtain the displayed derivative bound.

Remarks

  • The distributional delta is in the unscreened Coulomb part. The smooth Gaussian term has no delta mass.
  • The self expansion is the source of the Ewald energy correction −α∑iqi2/π after the potential is multiplied by qi/2.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

63 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources