Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Bounded H1 functionals have compatible local L2 representatives

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and fix the kernel φ and auxiliary order N~ of Mean-zero L2 functions on a cube embed continuously into H1. Let Λ∈(H1(Rn))∗ and let L02(Q) be the closed subspace of L2(Rn) of functions supported in the cube Q with ∫Qf=0 (equivalently, mean 0 when ∣Q∣>0). For every cube Q there is a unique uQ∈L02(Q) with Λ(f)=∫QuQf for every f∈L02(Q); moreover Q⊆R implies that uQ−uR is almost everywhere constant on Q. Consequently there are a locally integrable function u on Rn, unique up to additive constants, and for every cube Q a constant cQ with u−uQ=cQ almost everywhere on Q.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, a bounded linear functional Λ∈(H1(Rn))∗ and cubes Q⊆R, with the complex L2 space and its integral pairing of L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space and The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions.

[F1]

For every cube Q and every f∈L2(Rn) with supp⁡f⊆Q and ∫Qf=0 one has ∥f∥H1≤Cn,N~,φ∣Q∣1/2∥f∥L2 for the fixed kernel and order of (Mean-zero L2 functions on a cube embed continuously into H1).

[F2]

On complex L2(Rn) the form ⟨f,g⟩=∫fg‾ is a Hilbert-space inner product, and Riesz representation holds: for every bounded linear functional λ on a closed subspace H0 there is a unique y∈H0 with λ(f)=⟨f,y⟩ for all f∈H0 and ∥λ∥=∥y∥ (L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space, Riesz representation for Hilbert spaces).

[F4]

Cauchy-Schwarz gives ∣∫Qf∣≤∣Q∣1/2∥f∥2 (Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2).

[F3]

A countable union of Lebesgue-null sets is Lebesgue-null (Subsets and countable unions of null subsets of Rm are null), and Axis-parallel rectangles in Rm and their volume supplies the cube conventions of the chain Qk=[−k,k]n below.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F4

For a cube Q, the set L02(Q) is the kernel of the continuous linear functional f↦∫Qf on the closed subspace {f∈L2: f=0 a.e. off Q} (closedness follows from ∥f1Qc∥2≤∥f−fm∥2 for a supported approximating sequence fm, and continuity of the integral from [F4]), hence a closed subspace of the Hilbert space L2(Rn); and for f∈L02(Q) the boundedness of Λ and [F1] give ∣Λ(f)∣≤∥Λ∥ ∥f∥H1≤Cn,N~,φ∣Q∣1/2∥Λ∥ ∥f∥L2, so Λ∣L02(Q) is bounded for the L2 norm.

2.1step 1.1F2

By [F2] applied to the closed subspace L02(Q) and the bounded functional Λ∣L02(Q), there is a unique yQ∈L02(Q) with Λ(f)=⟨f,yQ⟩ for f∈L02(Q); setting uQ:=yQ‾, which still lies in L02(Q) because conjugation preserves supports and means, gives Λ(f)=∫QuQf for every f∈L02(Q), and uQ is unique with this property.

3.1step 2.1F2

Nested compatibility. If ∣Q∣=0, then L02(Q)={0} as an almost-everywhere quotient, and constancy almost everywhere on Q is vacuous. Assume now ∣Q∣>0. If Q⊆R then L02(Q)⊆L02(R), and for f∈L02(Q) step 2.1 gives ∫QuQf=Λ(f)=∫RuRf=∫QuRf. Put h:=uQ−uR and apply this identity with f:=h−mean⁡Q(h)‾1Q, which belongs to L02(Q). Then ∫Q∣h−mean⁡Q(h)∣2=0, so uQ−uR equals the constant mean⁡Q(uQ−uR) almost everywhere on Q.

4.1step 3.1F3

Gluing. Let Qk=[−k,k]n for k≥1 and use Countable Choice to select measurable representatives of their uQk. By step 3.1 the difference (uQk+1−uQk) is almost everywhere constant ak on Qk; define c1:=0 and ck+1:=ck−ak, so that uQk+1+ck+1=uQk+ck almost everywhere on Qk. Removing the countable union of the exceptional null sets, which is null by [F3], define u(x):=uQk(x)+ck for x∈Qk outside that null set, and set u=0 on the null set; this is well defined, locally integrable, and for every cube Q, choosing k with Q⊆Qk, the function u−uQ=[u−(uQk+ck)]+[(uQk+ck)−uQ] is almost everywhere constant on Q by the construction and step 3.1. If u′ is another such function, then on each Qk the difference u−u′ is constant almost everywhere, and the constants agree on the positive-measure overlap Qk∩Qk+1=Qk, so u−u′ is almost everywhere equal to a single constant on ⋃kQk=Rn: uniqueness up to additive constants.

5.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1∎

Steps 2.1, 3.1 and 4.1 prove the existence and uniqueness of each uQ, the nested constancy, and the existence of the global representative u with constants cQ, which is the statement. Countable Choice is used for the countably many representations and the countable union in step 4.1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

51 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources