Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The tangent orientation cover preserves simple-surface X-ray data

Statement

Let (M,g) be a compact, connected, nonempty smooth Riemannian surface with smooth boundary, and assume its boundary is strictly convex, it has no conjugate points, and it is nontrapping. Let π:M~→M be the tangent orientation double cover, give M~ the pullback metric g~=π∗g, and let C be any connected component of M~. Then C is a compact, connected, oriented simple Riemannian surface with smooth boundary, and π∣C:C→M is a local isometry mapping ∂C onto ∂M. For every f∈Cc∞(M∘), define f~=f∘π. For each incoming unit vector z~∈∂+SC, the scalar geodesic X-ray transform satisfies

I0,Cf~(z~)=I0,Mf(π(z~)).

In particular, zero data for f on M gives zero data for f~ on every component C.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compact connected nonempty simple Riemannian surface M, its tangent orientation double cover, a component C, and f∈Cc∞(M∘).

[F1]

Simple surface and geodesic X-ray transform: strict convexity means g(∇wνout,w)>0 for nonzero boundary-tangent w; no conjugate points means every Jacobi field vanishing at the two endpoints of a geodesic segment is zero; nontrapping means every maximal interior unit-speed geodesic exits in both time directions in finite time.

[F2]

Tangent orientation double cover of a surface with boundary: π:M~→M is a two-sheeted smooth covering and local diffeomorphism including over the boundary; its points are tangent orientation rays and its second coordinate defines a canonical orientation.

[F3]

For a finite-sheeted covering, the total space is compact exactly when the base is compact: a finite-sheeted covering has compact total space exactly when its base is compact.

[F4]

Riemannian metric and riemannian manifold: a Riemannian metric is a smooth positive-definite symmetric covariant two-tensor; Fundamental theorem of riemannian geometry: each supplied smooth Riemannian metric, also up to a boundary, has a unique Levi-Civita connection.

[F5]

Curvature of an affine connection: R(A,B)C=∇A∇BC−∇B∇AC−∇[A,B]C; Jacobi field: a Jacobi field satisfies Dt2J+R(J,γ˙)γ˙=0.

[F6]

Existence and uniqueness of path lifts through a covering map: every path in the base and every chosen initial point in its fibre have a unique continuous lift.

[F7]

Local existence, uniqueness, and smooth dependence for manifold integral curves: smooth local vector fields have unique local integral curves depending smoothly on initial state.

[F8]

A connected, locally path-connected space is path-connected, because its path components are open: a connected locally path-connected space is path-connected; smooth boundary charts have path-connected smaller half-ball neighborhoods.

Proof

1.1F2F3given

By [F2], π is a two-sheeted covering; applying [F3] to compact M shows that M~ is compact. In each boundary chart the two sheets are copies of the same half-space chart, so π−1(∂M)=∂M~ and π−1(M∘)=M~∘.

1.2F2F6F8given

Every connected component C of the smooth manifold M~ is open, since each point has a connected chart neighborhood contained in its component, and it is closed, since connected components are closed. Thus C is compact. Smooth boundary charts have path-connected smaller half-ball neighborhoods, so M is locally path-connected and [F8] makes connected M path-connected. Fix x~∈C and any y∈M; lift a path from π(x~) to y starting at x~ by [F6]. Its connected image stays in C, so its endpoint lies over y and π(C)=M. The canonical orientation from [F2] restricts to C.

2.1F1F2F4F5step 1.1

The pullback g~=π∗g is smooth and positive definite because dπ is a smooth isomorphism on each sheet and g is smooth positive definite by [F4]. In the sheet coordinates of [F2], π is the identity and the metric coefficient matrices of g~ and g coincide. The unique Levi-Civita connections therefore have identical coordinate coefficients; the geodesic equations and curvature coefficients also coincide by [F4, F5]. Boundary normals and their second fundamental forms correspond under dπ, so strict convexity of ∂M gives strict convexity of ∂C.

3.1F1F2F5step 2.1

If J~ is a Jacobi field along a geodesic segment in C, then [F5] and the identical local connection and curvature coefficients in step 2.1 show that dπ(J~) is a Jacobi field along the projected geodesic. If J~ vanishes at both endpoints, its projection vanishes there; [F1] makes the projected field zero, and invertibility of dπ gives J~=0. Thus C has no conjugate points.

4.1F1F2F6F7step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1

A unit-speed geodesic in C∘ projects by step 2.1 to a unit-speed geodesic in M∘. By [F1] that projected geodesic reaches ∂M in finite forward and backward time. Lift each finite projected segment from the specified initial point by [F6]. In every sheet the lift solves the same geodesic ODE as the original curve, so uniqueness from [F7] makes it an extension of that curve to the exit time; the endpoint lies in ∂C by step 1.1. Hence C is nontrapping in both directions. Together with steps 1.2–2.1, C is simple.

5.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1step 4.1construct∎

Since f is supported in the interior, f~=f∘π is smooth and vanishes near ∂M~. Its support is a closed subset of compact M~, hence compact, and it lies in C∘ after restriction to C. For an incoming z~∈∂+SC, local isometry maps its inward normal component to that of z=π(z~)∈∂+SM. The projected unit geodesic and the lifted unit geodesic have the same parameter and first boundary-exit time by steps 1.1 and 4.1; hence I0,Cf~(z~)=∫0τ+(z)f(γz(t)) dt=I0,Mf(z). This proves the transform identity and the zero-data implication.

Source locator

The source comparisons and item-specific dispositions are recorded in research/inverse-problems-knot-theory-all-109-2026-10-19-batch-38.coverage.json and the batch notes.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources