How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Uniform power phase decay for Beltrami CGO solutions
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice. Fix , choose , and put . Suppose is supported in , , and for , with fixed and . Let be its measurable-coefficient Beltrami CGO solution and principal phase. There exist constants , depending only on , such that The same constants apply to every coefficient , .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice and the data in the statement.
The CGO phase is a principal quasiconformal homeomorphism, conformal outside , with uniform deformation bounds and . Its inverse has the same dilatation and the standard inverse derivative identity. (Measurable-coefficient Beltrami CGO solutions and principal phases, Principal Beltrami solutions and uniform inverse-gradient integrability, The inverse of a quasiconformal map is quasiconformal with the same dilatation)
If and , then composition with the inverse of any principal phase in [F1] gives a uniformly bounded-support coefficient with translation modulus at most , where . (Positive power translation moduli after principal quasiconformal composition)
A principal solution of , with , , fixed bounded support and uniform positive power translation modulus, has for some uniform . (Power decay for oscillatory complex-linear Beltrami phases)
The Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice are used at [F1]–[F3]. (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice ())
Proof
Given: The data in the statement and .
Write and . The equation with gives . The nonvanishing exponential permits division, and all derivatives agree almost everywhere by [F1]. Apply the inverse derivative identity: its two derivative factors cancel the quotient , leaving . Thus this is a complex-linear Beltrami equation with oscillation vector of length and coefficient . Its support lies in the fixed disk containing by [F1].
By [F2], has uniform positive power translation modulus; its supremum bound remains , with almost-everywhere composition justified by null-set preservation in [F1]. It is legitimate that depends on , because [F3] is uniform over the entire coefficient family with these support and modulus bounds. Apply [F3] to the equation in step 1.1 to obtain . Since is onto, . Combine this with the spatial decay in [F1] to obtain the stated minimum bound. Multiplication of by a unimodular constant preserves every support, supremum and translation-modulus hypothesis; the constants therefore work for all .
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Measurable-coefficient Beltrami CGO solutions and principal phases
- Principal Beltrami solutions and uniform inverse-gradient integrability
- Positive power translation moduli after principal quasiconformal composition
- Power decay for oscillatory complex-linear Beltrami phases
- The inverse of a quasiconformal map is quasiconformal with the same dilatation
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
54 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Faraco and Prats, Characterization for stability in planar conductivities (standard reference, not scraped)