Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Kähler commutators and preservation of harmonic types

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let X be a compact Kähler manifold with the conventions of Compact Kähler and rational Hodge polarization conventions. Then the formal adjoints satisfy

[Λ,∂]=i∂ˉ∗,[Λ,∂ˉ]=−i∂∗,[∂ˉ∗,L]=i∂,[∂∗,L]=−i∂ˉ.

One has Δd=2Δ∂=2Δ∂ˉ, the mixed anticommutators ∂∂ˉ∗+∂ˉ∗∂ and ∂ˉ∂∗+∂∗∂ˉ vanish, and Δd commutes with L,Λ,∂,∂ˉ,∗, and preserves each bidegree Ωp,q(X).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The compact Kähler manifold and its operators L,Λ,∂,∂ˉ,∂∗,∂ˉ∗,d∗ and Laplacians; by AC implies DC implies countable choice the Axiom of Choice supplies the countable choice used by the general Stokes theorem and the smooth partition data behind the formal adjoints.

[F1]

The operators and Laplacians are as in Compact Kähler and rational Hodge polarization conventions: Λ,∂∗,∂ˉ∗,d∗ are the formal adjoints of L,∂,∂ˉ,d for the integral inner product ⟨α,β⟩=∫Xα∧∗βˉ, and on the complexified exterior algebra the pointwise operators and star are those of Hermitian exterior Lefschetz decomposition and Weil star identity.

[F2]

The formal adjoint of a differential operator of order at most two on a metric vector bundle has the local formula P⋆v=∑∣α∣≤2(−1)∣α∣γ−1Dα(γ aα∗v) in a chart with density coefficient γ and orthonormal frames, and it is characterized by ∫⟨Pu,v⟩ dμ=∫⟨u,P⋆v⟩ dμ for compactly supported smooth sections (Formal adjoints of differential operators on metric vector bundles).

[F3]

In holomorphic charts Ωk(X;C)=⨁p+q=kΩp,q(X) and d=∂+∂ˉ with ∂,∂ˉ of bidegree (1,0) and (0,1) (Compact Kähler and rational Hodge polarization conventions), and the local identities ∂2=∂ˉ2=∂∂ˉ+∂ˉ∂=0 hold (The d, partial and dbar identities); since the Kähler form has bidegree (1,1) and dω=0, directness of the bidegree decomposition gives ∂ω=∂ˉω=0.

[F4]

The general Stokes theorem holds on compact oriented manifolds (The general Stokes theorem), and the holomorphic inverse function theorem in several variables gives local inverse branches of a holomorphic map with invertible Jacobian (The holomorphic inverse function theorem in several complex variables).

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F4givenalgebraconstruct

For n≥1, fix x0∈X and choose holomorphic coordinates with habˉ(0)=12δab, where habˉ=gC(∂za,∂zˉb) for the complex-bilinear extension of g. Then ω=i∑a,bhabˉ dza∧dzˉb, and dω=0 implies ∂chabˉ=∂ahcbˉ. Put Γacb=2∂ahcbˉ(0) and make the symmetric quadratic change zb=wb−12∑a,cΓacbwawc. Its derivative at zero is the identity, so [F4] makes it a holomorphic coordinate change near zero. In the transformed matrix habˉ′=∑i,jhijˉ(z(w))(∂zi/∂wa)(∂zj/∂wb)‾, one has ∂chabˉ′(0)=∂chabˉ(0)−12Γacb=0. The antiholomorphic derivatives vanish by the Hermitian symmetry. Thus h′=12I+O(∣w∣2), and the induced form metric, its inverse and the volume density have vanishing first derivatives at zero. Formula [F2] therefore gives the flat adjoint formulas at this point. When n=0 the claimed identities are immediate from [F1]; assume n≥1 below.

2.1F1F2step 1.1givenalgebra

Work at such a normal point with the constant-coefficient operators on the coframe dzj,dzˉj: write aj=dzj∧, bj=dzˉj∧ and let cj=aj∗, dj=bj∗ be the pointwise adjoints of [F1], so that {cj,ak}=2δjk, {dj,bk}=2δjk and the mixed anticommutators {cj,bk}, {dj,ak} vanish (the factor two is h(dzj,dzj)). Then ∂=∑jaj∂zj, ∂ˉ=∑jbj∂zˉj, ∂∗=−∑jcj∂zˉj, ∂ˉ∗=−∑jdj∂zj, L=i2∑jajbj and Λ=−i2∑jdjcj, and direct expansion using the anticommutation relations gives Λ∂−∂Λ=−i∑jdj∂zj=i∂ˉ∗ (the mixed pairs [djcj,ak]=2δjkdj), Λ∂ˉ−∂ˉΛ=i∑jcj∂zˉj=−i∂∗, ∂ˉ∗L−L∂ˉ∗=i∑jaj∂zj=i∂ and ∂∗L−L∂∗=−i∑jbj∂zˉj=−i∂ˉ. Every one of these operators is a differential operator of order at most two whose coefficients involve at most first derivatives of the metric, so equality at every normal point proves the four identities globally; the normalization enters only through the factor h(dzj,dzj)=2, and both sides scale the same way if the metric is rescaled by a constant, so no normalization is mixed inside the computation.

3.1step 2.1F3givenalgebra

Use the graded bracket, for which the bracket of two odd operators is their anticommutator and [Λ,∂]=i∂ˉ∗ reads ∂ˉ∗=−i[Λ,∂]. By [F3] the operators ∂,∂ˉ are odd and satisfy ∂2=∂ˉ2=∂∂ˉ+∂ˉ∂=0, while Λ is even. Graded Jacobi applied to ∂,Λ,∂ gives [∂,[Λ,∂]]=0 because the two middle terms cancel and ∂2=0, hence [∂,∂ˉ∗]=−i[∂,[Λ,∂]]=0, and its adjoint gives [∂ˉ,∂∗]=0; these are exactly the two vanishing mixed anticommutators. Graded Jacobi applied to ∂ˉ,Λ,∂ gives [∂ˉ,[Λ,∂]]=[∂,[∂ˉ,Λ]], hence [∂ˉ,∂ˉ∗]=−i[∂ˉ,[Λ,∂]]=−i[∂,[∂ˉ,Λ]]=i[∂,[Λ,∂ˉ]]=[∂,∂∗], using the second identity of step 2.1; that is Δ∂ˉ=Δ∂. Expanding d=∂+∂ˉ and d∗=∂∗+∂ˉ∗ with the two mixed anticommutators gives Δd=Δ∂+Δ∂ˉ=2Δ∂=2Δ∂ˉ.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1F1F2F3F4givenalgebra∎

For the remaining commutation relations: [∂,L]=∂ω∧=0 and [∂ˉ,L]=0 by [F3]; then [Δ∂,L]=∂[∂∗,L]+[∂,L]∂∗+[∂∗,L]∂+∂∗[∂,L]=−i(∂∂ˉ+∂ˉ∂)=0, where the first equality uses Δ∂=∂∂∗+∂∗∂ and [∂∗,L]=−i∂ˉ, and adjunction gives [Δ∂,Λ]=0; since Δd=2Δ∂, Δd commutes with L and Λ. Commutation with ∂ and ∂ˉ follows from ∂2=∂ˉ2=0 and Δd=2Δ∂=2Δ∂ˉ. For the star: for α of degree k−1 and β of degree k the formal-adjoint identity of [F2] for d and the characterizing property α′∧∗βˉ=⟨α′,β⟩ dV of the star give ∫α∧∗d∗β‾=(−1)k∫α∧d∗βˉ, hence, since this holds for all α, the operator identity ∗d∗=(−1)kd∗ on degree k; substituting it and ∗2=(−1)k(m−k) with m=2n into Δd=dd∗+d∗d shows ∗Δd=Δd∗ on every degree, because the adjacent-degree relations are ∗d∗=(−1)kd∗ and ∗d=(−1)k+1d∗∗ on degree k, and hence ∗dd∗=d∗d∗ and ∗d∗d=dd∗∗. Finally Δ∂ˉ=Δd/2 has bidegree (0,0) because ∂ˉ and ∂ˉ∗ shift bidegree by (0,±1), so Δd preserves each Ωp,q(X). For n=0 every operator but the star is zero and all assertions are immediate.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

49 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources