How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The mixed crossing sum is even and defines linking number
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let be a regular oriented diagram of a two-component oriented link in , with components . Write Then is even, and is unchanged by planar isotopy and by each oriented Reidemeister move of types I, II, and III. Thus it has the same value on any two regular diagrams of ambient-isotopic oriented links. It is symmetric in ; reversing exactly one component changes its sign, and reversing both components leaves it unchanged.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice and a regular oriented diagram of a two-component oriented link.
The Axiom of Countable Choice, written (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
A regular diagram is the image of an oriented link under a projection whose only multiple points are finitely many transverse double points, with no triple points; its strands carry their orientations and over/under data (Regular oriented link diagrams).
At a crossing , is the sign of the determinant of the oriented overpassing and underpassing projected tangent vectors in the oriented projection plane (Oriented crossing signs, diagram writhe, and blackboard framing).
For compact boundaryless sources, the mod intersection number of two transverse maps is the cardinality of their fiber product with coefficients in ; it is invariant under homotopy of either map when holds (The mod 2 intersection number, The mod 2 intersection number is homotopy invariant).
Under , two regular oriented diagrams represent the same oriented link if and only if a finite sequence of planar isotopies and oriented Reidemeister moves of types I, II, and III connects them (Reidemeister's theorem for oriented diagrams).
A type-I move creates or deletes one self-crossing; a type-II move creates or deletes two crossings of opposite sign; a type-III move preserves the signs and over/under data of its three crossings (Oriented Reidemeister moves).
Proof
Let be the projected component maps. They are transverse at every mixed crossing by [F1]. The map , , is transverse to the diagonal , and its inverse image of has one point for each mixed crossing because there are no triple points. Therefore is the number of mixed crossings modulo . Homotope linearly to a point with greater than ; the endpoint map misses . By [F3], the intersection number is , so the number of mixed crossings is even.
A type-I move contributes no mixed crossing because its new crossing is a self-crossing. Under type II, either both crossings are self-crossings or they are both mixed and have opposite signs by [F5], so is unchanged. Under type III the three crossing signs and over/under data are preserved, so the mixed subset and its signed sum are unchanged. Planar isotopy creates no crossings and preserves the oriented crossing charts. Hence each move preserves .
Each crossing sign is or , both congruent to modulo . Thus has the same parity as the number of mixed crossings shown even in step 1.1; consequently is an integer. Swapping component labels leaves each mixed crossing unchanged, while reversing one strand orientation negates its tangent vector and hence the determinant in [F2]; reversing both vectors preserves the determinant. This proves symmetry and the orientation rules.
If two regular diagrams represent the same oriented link, [F4] gives a finite sequence of the moves and planar isotopies checked in step 1.2. By step 2.1 their half-sums are integers; step 1.2 preserves these values at every move, so the endpoint linking numbers agree. Countable Choice is used through [F3] for homotopy-invariant mod intersection and through [F4] for the finite-move reduction; the determinant calculations and the move-by-move checks are choice-free.
Depends on
- Oriented crossing signs, diagram writhe, and blackboard framing
- Oriented links in the three-sphere and ambient isotopy
- Regular oriented link diagrams
- Oriented Reidemeister moves
- Reidemeister's theorem for oriented diagrams
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The mod 2 intersection number
- The mod 2 intersection number is homotopy invariant
Used by
- Compute oriented linking number from a diagram Algorithm
- Dualizable framed handle link Definition
- Piccirillo’s Conway diagrams give a dualizable handle link Lemma
- Small framed push-offs define a well-defined self-linking number Lemma
- Well-definedness of the Seifert pairing Lemma
- A dualizable handle link gives two zero-trace descriptions Theorem
- A Seifert framing has zero self-linking Theorem
- Blackboard self-linking equals diagram self-writhe Theorem
- Linking number and Fox coloring finite complexity Theorem
- Linking number is invariant and writhe changes under a kink Theorem
- The diagram linking-number scan terminates and returns the stated integer Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Danny Calegari, Introduction to Knot Theory, University of Chicago course notes (2025), §3.3, pp. 26–29 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Mohamed Elhamdadi, Mustafa Hajij, and Kyle Istvan, Framed Knots, arXiv:1910.10257v6 (2020), §3, pp. 3–9 (standard reference, not scraped)