Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Local dimension for a reducible classical algebraic set

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let X be a reduced classical finite-type space over an algebraically closed field k, and let x∈X be a closed point. If Xi are the irreducible components of X, then dim⁡OX,x=max⁡x∈Xidim⁡Xi.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, an algebraically closed field k, a reduced classical finite-type space X over k, and a closed point x∈X.

[F1]

A classical variety is Noetherian with finitely many irreducible components; every open or closed subvariety has a finite affine cover (Classical varieties have finite irreducible decompositions).

[F2]

For an affine algebraic set U⊆Akn, its coordinate ring is k[U]=k[t1,…,tn]/I(U) (The coordinate ring of an affine algebraic set).

[F3]

Over algebraically closed k and under AC, the Nullstellensatz correspondence identifies radical ideals of k[U] with closed subsets of U; nonempty irreducible closed subsets correspond to proper prime ideals (Classical affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible sets to prime ideals).

[F4]

For a classical affine variety U and x∈U, the local ring is canonically OU,x≅k[U]mx, where mx is the ideal of functions vanishing at x (The local ring at a point of an affine variety is the localization at its maximal ideal).

[F5]

For a ring A and multiplicative set S, prime ideals of S−1A correspond by an inclusion-preserving bijection to the prime ideals of A disjoint from S (Prime ideals of a localization are exactly the primes disjoint from the denominator set).

[F6]

If Y is an irreducible classical variety and x is a closed point of Y, then dim⁡OY,x=dim⁡Y (Closed-point local dimension equals ambient irreducible dimension).

[F7]

AC says that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

1.1F1F2F4F7givenchoose

Choose an affine open neighborhood U⊆X of x, put A=k[U], let m⊂A be the maximal ideal of functions vanishing at x, and write R=OX,x. By [F4], R≅Am. The finite component decomposition of X restricts to a finite decomposition of U by its irreducible components Uj=Xj∩U; precisely those Uj containing x come from the global components Xj containing x.

2.1F3F5step 1.1

For each component Uj, let pj=IU(Uj)⊆A. The Nullstellensatz correspondence makes pj prime and reverses inclusions of closed subsets. The localization correspondence identifies the primes of R=Am with the primes p⊆m of A, preserving strict chains. In particular, if x∈Uj, then qj:=pjAm is a prime of R.

3.1F1F3F5step 2.1algebra

Consider any strict prime chain q0⊊q1⊊⋯⊊qr in R, and contract it to p0⊊p1⊊⋯⊊pr in A using [F5]. The irreducible closed subset VU(p0) contains x, since p0⊆m. Because U is a finite union of its irreducible components, irreducibility forces VU(p0)⊆Uj for some j. Thus x∈Uj and pj⊆p0, so qj⊆q0. The chain therefore gives a chain of length r in R/qj.

4.1F2F4F6step 3.1algebra

The quotient-localization isomorphism gives R/qj≅(A/pj)m/pj, which is the local ring OUj,x=OXj,x because Uj=Xj∩U is an open neighborhood of x in Xj. Hence [F6] gives dim⁡(R/qj)=dim⁡Xj. Step 3.1 now bounds every chain length in R by max⁡x∈Xidim⁡Xi.

5.1F6step 2.1step 4.1algebra

Conversely, for every global component Xi containing x, its qi is prime in R by step 2.1 and dim⁡(R/qi)=dim⁡Xi by step 4.1. Every prime chain in R/qi lifts to a prime chain in R, so dim⁡R≥dim⁡Xi. Taking the maximum gives the reverse inequality.

6.1F7step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1∎

Steps 3.1–5.1 prove the asserted equality. The argument uses AC only through the explicitly AC-dependent component, affine-correspondence, local-ring, and irreducible local-dimension suppliers; after their finite component and prime correspondences are in hand, the chain comparison makes no further choice.

Source note

Milne’s §3c notes 3.13–3.14 identify local primes with irreducible closed subsets through a point and identify the components through that point with minimal local primes. The proof of Corollary 4.45 in §4i uses this local component description. The dimension of each irreducible component at a closed point is supplied here by Closed-point local dimension equals ambient irreducible dimension; Milne’s Chapter 10 supplement, 10.54–10.56, gives the corresponding irreducible-scheme dimension conventions. The finite reducible case above is proved by the displayed prime-chain comparison.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources