Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The normal bundle of the diagonal is canonically the tangent bundle

Statement

Assume ACω. Let M be a smooth boundaryless n-manifold and ΔM={(x,x):x∈M}⊆M×M the diagonal, embedded by The diagonal is an embedded submanifold. The difference map T(M×M)∣ΔM⟶TM,(v,w)⟼w−v, written in the canonical splitting T(M×M)∣ΔM≅TM⊕TM of Canonical tangent and cotangent splittings for products, has kernel TΔM and induces a canonical isomorphism of smooth vector bundles over ΔM≅M νΔM=T(M×M)∣ΔM/TΔM  ⟶  TM. If M is oriented, give the normal bundle the orientation for which the tangent orientation of ΔM followed by the normal orientation is the product orientation of M×M (Product orientations, An oriented transverse normal bundle orients an embedded submanifold); under this orientation convention the isomorphism is orientation-preserving when ΔM carries the orientation transported from M.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The smooth boundaryless n-manifold M, its diagonal ΔM, the canonical product splitting and the two orientation conventions of the statement.

[F1]

The diagonal ΔM={(p,p):p∈M}⊆M×M is an embedded submanifold of dimension dim⁡M (The diagonal is an embedded submanifold).

[F2]

For smooth manifolds M,N there is a canonical vector-space isomorphism T(p,q)(M×N)≅TpM⊕TqN (Canonical tangent and cotangent splittings for products).

[F3]

M×M carries the product smooth structure defined by product charts (Products of smooth manifolds have a canonical product smooth structure).

[F4]

The differential is defined on derivations by dFp(v)([g])=v([g∘F]) (The differential of a smooth map).

[F5]

The normal-bundle set of an embedded submanifold is the fibrewise quotient ν(S)=∐p∈STpM/TpS (Normal and conormal bundles of an embedded submanifold).

[F6]

If S⊆E is a smooth rank-k subbundle of a smooth rank-r vector bundle, then the fibrewise quotient E/S→M is a smooth vector bundle, and constant-rank kernels and images of bundle maps over the identity are smooth subbundles (A vector bundle quotient by a subbundle is a smooth vector bundle, Constant-rank kernels and images of bundle maps over one base are subbundles).

[F7]

A smooth rank-r vector bundle is a smooth fibre bundle whose fibres are r-dimensional real vector spaces with local trivializations (Smooth vector bundles, rank, fibres, and trivial bundles).

[F8]

For oriented vector spaces the product orientation is defined by the ordered determinant isomorphism det⁡(V⊕W)≅det⁡V⊗det⁡W (Product orientations).

[F9]

For an embedded submanifold, any two of the orientations of the ambient tangent bundle, the tangent bundle and the transverse normal bundle determine the third; in this pair the convention is that a positive tangent basis followed by a positive normal basis is positive in the ambient (An oriented transverse normal bundle orients an embedded submanifold).

Proof

technique · compute the kernel and the quotient of the difference map in the product splitting, then transport the orientation through the same determinant comparison
1.1F1F2F3F4F5F6F7givenalgebra

In a chart of M, the product tangent coordinates identify the splitting [F2] with the two coordinate-vector blocks, and the difference map Φ(v,w)=w−v has the constant matrix [−I I]. Hence the splitting and Φ are smooth in the product charts [F3], without requiring a general smooth-differential theorem. The diagonal inclusion has coordinate expression x↦(x,x), so its differential [F4] sends v to (v,v). Thus ker⁡Φ=TΔM. By [F5] and [F6] the quotient is a smooth bundle, and its induced map to TM has smooth inverse u↦[(0,u)], as is also seen in these local trivializations [F7]. These formulas include n=0 and empty M.

2.1F8F9algebra∎

Orientation. In an oriented basis (e1,…,en) of TxM the product orientation of TxM⊕TxM is the class of ((e1,0),…,(en,0),(0,e1),…,(0,en)) [F8]. The diagonal basis δi=(ei,ei) is obtained from it by the block matrix (I0II) of determinant +1, while the lifts (0,ej) of the normal classes satisfy Φ(0,ej)=ej. Hence the ordered basis (δ1,…,δn,(0,e1),…,(0,en)) is positive in the product orientation exactly when the ej are positive in TxM: with the tangent-first convention [F9] the induced normal orientation is carried by Φ to the tangent orientation transported from M, so the isomorphism is orientation-preserving. For n=0, write the supplied tangent orientation unit as o=±1: the ambient product unit is o2=1, and the tangent-first rule gives normal unit o−1=o, preserved by the unique rank-zero isomorphism.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources