Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Order and simultaneous normal crossings are preserved by smooth morphisms

Statement

Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice), as inherited from the regular-local algebra suppliers.

Let φ ⁣:X′→X be a smooth morphism of smooth K-schemes (Smooth morphism of schemes).

(1) For every coherent ideal sheaf I⊆OX (Coherent module sheaves) and every x′∈X′ with x=φ(x′), ord⁡x′(φ∗I)=ord⁡x(I), where the order is that of Order of an ideal sheaf at a point.

(2) Assume in addition that X′ is of pure dimension, as required by the SNC interface. If E is a family of divisors in simultaneous SNC position on X (Simple normal crossings divisors and simultaneous normal crossings position) then the family φ−1(E) of scheme-theoretic inverse images of its members is a family of divisors in simultaneous SNC position on X′; the individual inverse images are reduced effective Cartier divisors (Effective cartier divisor).

This is the source's Lemma 2.4.1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth morphism φ:X′→X of smooth K-schemes, an arbitrary point x′∈X′ with image x, and a coherent ideal sheaf I or a simultaneous SNC family on X. Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the regular-local algebra suppliers.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: AC is inherited from the regular-local parameter, regular-sequence, and associated-graded suppliers below; no residue-field equality is assumed.

[F1]

Smooth morphism of schemes and A local ring is a nonzero commutative ring with a unique maximal ideal: the induced map of Noetherian local rings A=OX,x→B=OX′,x′ is flat and local, and its fibre local ring B/mAB is regular. Both A and B are regular, since X and X′ are smooth over K.

[F2]

embedding dimension and regular local ring and regular system of parameters: a regular local ring of dimension d has a minimal maximal-ideal generating tuple of length d, called a regular system of parameters; its classes are a basis of the cotangent space.

[F3]

regular local rings are domains and cohen macaulay: a regular local ring is a domain and every regular system of parameters is a regular sequence.

[F4]

Localisation And Faithfully Flat Base Change Of Regular Sequences: a regular sequence remains regular after faithfully flat base change.

[F5]

quotient and lifting regularity across a regular element: if z is a nonzerodivisor in the maximal ideal of a Noetherian local ring R and R/(z) is regular, then R is regular and z∉mR2. In a regular local ring, quotienting by a parameter gives a regular local ring.

[F6]

associated graded ring of a regular local ring: a cotangent basis in a regular local ring identifies its maximal-adic associated graded ring with the polynomial algebra on the classes of that basis.

[F7]

Order of an ideal sheaf at a point and Coherent module sheaves: the order of an ideal stalk I⊆A is the supremum of the integers N≥0 with I⊆mAN, with value +∞ for the zero ideal.

[F8]

Simple normal crossings divisors and simultaneous normal crossings position and Effective cartier divisor: an SNC divisor is locally the reduced product of a subset of a regular system of parameters, and simultaneous SNC requires this for the union of every subfamily. A nonzerodivisor equation gives an effective Cartier divisor; a unit equation gives the empty effective divisor.

Proof

1.1F1given

Work at an arbitrary x′ and its image x, with A,B as in [F1], maximal ideals m,n, and residue fields κ=A/m, λ=B/n. The map A→B is faithfully flat: for any proper ideal J⊆A, locality gives JB⊆n, so B/JB≠0; any nonzero A-module contains a nonzero cyclic submodule A/J, whose injection remains injective after flat tensoring, so its tensor with B is nonzero. The closed-fibre local ring B/mB is regular by smoothness. This argument applies to nonclosed and nonrational points as well.

2.1F2F3F4F5step 1.1choose

Choose a regular system of parameters u1,…,ud of A. Its image in B is a regular sequence by [F3, F4]. Put Bi=B/(u1,…,ui)B; the terminal ring Bd=B/mB is regular. Backward induction using [F5] shows that every Bi is regular and that the class of ui+1 is outside the square of its maximal ideal. Thus ui+1∉(u1,…,ui)B+n2, and the images of all ui are linearly independent in n/n2. Extend them to a cotangent basis; its lifts generate n by the finite-generator Nakayama argument (if the quotient module equals its maximal-ideal multiple, a matrix I−M with unit determinant annihilates its generators). They therefore form a regular system of parameters of B. When d=0 the tuple is empty and the same conclusion is immediate.

3.1F6step 2.1algebra

By [F6], the parameter systems in step 2.1 identify gr⁡mA with κ[U1,…,Ud] and gr⁡nB with λ[U1,…,Ud,V1,…,Ve]. The induced graded map sends each Ui to the corresponding parameter class and extends the residue-field embedding κ→λ; it is therefore injective. In particular an element of mj∖mj+1 remains outside nj+1.

3.2F8step 2.1

At a point x on an SNC union, choose its distinct component equations u1,…,uc as part of a regular system of parameters of A, as in [F8]. Step 2.1, applied with that system, shows that their images are part of a regular system of parameters of B. Hence the inverse image union is locally the product of those same distinct parameter equations, so it has SNC at x′. This applies to every subfamily and every point over it, independently of its residue field or its position in the fibre, proving simultaneous SNC. Where no component occurs, the equation is a unit and its inverse image is empty.

4.1F1F7step 3.1algebra

For an ideal I⊆A and N≥0, the inclusion I⊆mN implies IB⊆nN because the map is local. Conversely, if IB⊆nN and a∈I∖mN, choose the largest j<N for which a∈mj; step 3.1 gives a∉nj+1, contradicting a∈IB⊆nN. Thus I⊆mN  ⟺  IB⊆nN for every N, and taking suprema proves (1), including unit ideals of order zero and zero ideals of infinite order. Flatness identifies the ideal pullback with its extended ideal.

5.1A1F3F5F8step 3.2algebra∎

Each pulled-back member is a product of distinct parameters in the regular local domain B, hence a nonzerodivisor. Each individual parameter generates a prime ideal, since its quotient is regular by [F5] and a domain by [F3]. Their distinct principal prime ideals have intersection equal to their product: divisibility by one prime parameter and the fact that it divides none of the others prove this successively. The product ideal is consequently radical. Thus each inverse image is a reduced effective Cartier divisor, completing (2). AC is used only through the parameter and associated-graded suppliers [A1]; no completion isomorphism or equality of residue fields is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

96 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources