How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Conventions for the resolution development
Remark
This page follows the source conventions of Field and A field's prime subfield is isomorphic to in characteristic zero and to in characteristic : is a field of characteristic zero, i.e. its prime subfield is .
A -variety is an integral, separated scheme of finite type over (Integral schemes, Separated morphism of schemes, Locally finite type and finite type morphisms); a smooth -scheme is a scheme of finite type over whose structure morphism is smooth (Smooth morphism of schemes); in characteristic zero a scheme of finite type over is smooth over exactly when all its local rings are regular, by the perfect-field geometric-regularity criterion (Field tests for geometric regularity, Locally standard smooth iff flat with geometrically regular fibres).
The core resolution construction is over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, as in the source. Items with an explicitly broader field or characteristic range retain their stated hypotheses; the descent item and final theorems apply over arbitrary characteristic-zero fields. The positive-characteristic derivative converses require the perfect-field qualifications stated in their items.
All blowups are blowups of regular closed subschemes of smooth -schemes, and all divisors are effective Cartier divisors; SNC' abbreviates simple normal crossings' in the sense of Simple normal crossings divisors and simultaneous normal crossings position.
Resolutions are stated for reduced or integral base schemes and are constructed from an ambient smooth scheme.
The Axiom of Choice is assumed throughout this resolution development and is inherited from the published blowup and relative-Proj suppliers (The Axiom of Choice); no dependent-choice or other choice principle is used by this page's new arguments beyond what those suppliers already assume.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Coherent module sheaves
- embedding dimension and regular local ring
- Field
- Integral schemes
- Locally finite type and finite type morphisms
- Locally Noetherian and Noetherian schemes
- Separated morphism of schemes
- Simple normal crossings divisors and simultaneous normal crossings position
- Smooth morphism of schemes
- A field's prime subfield is isomorphic to $\mathbb Q$ in characteristic zero and to $\mathbb F_p$ in characteristic $p$
- Field tests for geometric regularity
- Locally standard smooth iff flat with geometrically regular fibres
Used by
- Marked ideals and their support Definition
Dependency tree · two levels
81 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jaroslaw Wlodarczyk, Simple Hironaka resolution in characteristic zero, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 18 (2005) 779-822; author's arXiv version math/0401401 (28 pp., dated October 25, 2018) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Herwig Hauser, The Hironaka theorem on resolution of singularities (or: A proof we always wanted to understand), Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 40 (2003) 323-403 (standard reference, not scraped)