Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Uniform L-infinity, mass and energy bounds for the viscous approximations

Statement

Assume Countable Choice (CC). Let n≥1, 0<ε≤1, f∈C2(R;Rn) with f(0)=0, and u0∈Cc∞(Rn). Let uε be the viscous solution constructed in The viscous scalar Cauchy problem with smooth data has a global classical solution, so that uε∈C([0,T];Cb(Rn))∩C([0,T];L1(Rn))∩C1,2(Rn×(0,T)) solves utε+div⁡xf(uε)=εΔuε pointwise. Then for every t∈[0,T]:

(i) ∥uε(t)∥∞≤∥u0∥∞;

(ii) signed mass is conserved, ∫Rnuε(t,x) dx=∫Rnu0(x) dx, while the L1 norm is nonincreasing, ∥uε(t)∥1≤∥u0∥1 (in general it is not constant);

(iii) the integrated energy identity 12∥uε(t)∥22+ε∫0t ⁣ ⁣∫Rn∣∇uε∣2 dx ds=12∥u0∥22, so that ε∫0T ⁣ ⁣∫∣∇uε∣2≤12∥u0∥22, uniformly for 0<ε≤1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, n≥1, 0<ε≤1, f∈C2 with f(0)=0, u0∈Cc∞, the viscous solution uε, a time t∈[0,T], and the constant LM:=sup⁡∣s∣≤∥u0∥∞∣f′(s)∣.

[F1]

The constructed solution obeys the range bound sup⁡xuε(t,x)≤sup⁡xu0 and inf⁡xuε(t,x)≥inf⁡xu0, has AT:=sup⁡0≤s≤T∥uε(s)∥1<∞ by its L1-continuous orbit, and solves utε+div⁡f(uε)=εΔuε pointwise (The viscous scalar Cauchy problem with smooth data has a global classical solution).

[F2]

The viscous entropy balance holds pointwise for every convex C2 entropy: ∂tη(uε)+div⁡q(uε)=εΔη(uε)−εη′′(uε)∣∇uε∣2 with q′=η′f′ (The viscous entropy dissipation identity, Convex entropy--entropy flux pairs).

[F3]

There are smooth radial cutoffs 0≤χR≤1 with χR=1 on BR, χR=0 outside B2R, χR↑1 as R→∞, ∣DχR∣≤C/R and ∣ΔχR∣≤C/R2: use the explicit profile χR(x)=σ((4−∣x∣2/R2)/3) from the cited construction. On 0<t<1, differentiating its defining quotient gives σ′(t)=σ(t)(1−σ(t))(t−2+(1−t)−2)>0, so the profile is nonincreasing in radius and χR increases with R. The derivative scaling gives the stated gradient and Laplacian bounds (Explicit compactly supported smooth cutoffs, The Laplacian of a C2 function and of a C2 vector field).

[F4]

Spatial integration by parts against a compactly supported smooth χ follows from the one-dimensional theorem, not from a theorem on balls: enclose supp⁡χ in the interior of a box, fix all coordinates except xi, and apply Integration by parts for continuous factors with Riemann-integrable extensions of their interior derivatives on that coordinate interval. The integrands are continuous, their Riemann and Lebesgue integrals agree by A bounded Riemann integrable function on a closed bounded interval is Lebesgue measurable and has the same integral, and Fubini (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product) integrates the identity over the remaining coordinates. Boundary terms vanish since χ vanishes near the box boundary. Summing gives ∫χdiv⁡Q=−∫Q⋅∇χ; applying the same argument twice gives ∫χΔv=∫vΔχ for Q∈C1 and v∈C2. Dominated and monotone convergence justify the indicated cutoff and nonnegative limits (Dominated convergence, Monotone convergence for the integral, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1

Supremum bound. Statement (i) is exactly the range bound of the construction theorem [F1]: ∥uε(t)∥∞≤max⁡{∣sup⁡xu0∣,∣inf⁡xu0∣}=∥u0∥∞.

1.2F1F3F4

Mass identity with cutoffs. Multiply the pointwise equation by a cutoff χR of [F3], integrate first from a positive lower time, and then pass that time to zero by C([0,T];L1) continuity: since χR vanishes outside a compact set, integration by parts is legitimate and gives ∫uε(t)χR−∫u0χR=∫0t ⁣ ⁣∫(f(uε)⋅∇χR+εuεΔχR); by [F1] the right side is bounded in absolute value by (CLMR−1+εCR−2)∫0t∥uε(s)∥1ds≤CT(R−1+εR−2).

1.3F1F2F3F4

Positive-time energy identity. Put M=∥u0∥∞. Fix 0<s<t≤T, take the convex entropy η(r)=r2/2 and its flux q(r)=∫0raf′(a) da, and integrate the balance [F2] against χR over [s,t]×Rn. This is legitimate on each compact support because uε∈C1,2 for positive times. The resulting identity is 12∫∣uε(t)∣2χR+ε∫st ⁣ ⁣∫∣∇uε∣2χR=12∫∣uε(s)∣2χR+∫st ⁣ ⁣∫q(uε)⋅∇χR+ε∫st ⁣ ⁣∫η(uε)ΔχR. On the solution range, ∣q(uε)∣≤LMM∣uε∣/2 and η(uε)≤M∣uε∣/2, so both cutoff errors tend to zero by [F1, F3]; the endpoint energies converge by dominated convergence. Since χR↑1, monotone convergence applies to the nonnegative dissipation and gives 12∥uε(t)∥22+ε∫st ⁣ ⁣∫∣∇uε∣2=12∥uε(s)∥22. In particular the dissipation is finite on every positive-time interval.

2.1F1F2F4step 1.2

Signed mass and L1 bound. In step 1.2 the right side tends to 0 when R→∞, while uε(t)χR→uε(t) and u0χR→u0 pointwise with ∣uε(t)∣χR≤∣uε(t)∣ and ∣u0∣χR≤∣u0∣, and both majorants are integrable by [F1]; dominated convergence gives ∫uε(t)=∫u0, which is signed-mass conservation. For the L1 bound let ηδ(s)=s2+δ2−δ, a convex C2 function with 0≤ηδ≤∣⋅∣, ηδ↑∣⋅∣ as δ↓0, and let qδ′=ηδ′f′ with qδ(0)=0. Testing the balance [F2] with χR, integrating first on a positive-time interval and passing its lower endpoint to zero by the Lipschitz entropy and L1 continuity and using ∣qδ(s)∣≤LM∣s∣ and ηδ(s)≤∣s∣ on the range of [F1], the cutoff terms vanish in the limit R→∞ exactly as in step 1.2, and dropping the nonpositive dissipation gives ∫ηδ(uε(t))≤∫ηδ(u0); monotone convergence in δ↓0 yields ∥uε(t)∥1≤∥u0∥1.

3.1F1step 1.3F4∎

Passage to the initial time. The construction gives uε∈C([0,T];L1) and ∥uε(s)∥∞≤M=∥u0∥∞. Hence ∥uε(s)−u0∥22≤2M∥uε(s)−u0∥1⟶0(s↓0), so the endpoint energy in step 1.3 converges to 12∥u0∥22. Letting s↓0, monotone convergence for the nonnegative space-time dissipation gives the identity in (iii) for every t>0; at t=0 it is immediate. Dropping the nonnegative final energy yields the stated uniform bound for 0<ε≤1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

82 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources