How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Weak differentiation ignores null-set changes
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let be open, , and let satisfy and almost everywhere. Then In particular this applies to representatives of classes for every : on each compact test support, the representatives are locally integrable.
If , the only classes and tests are zero, so the identity is vacuous and the equivalence still holds.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, a compactly supported smooth test , and the four locally integrable functions in the Statement.
The weak derivative identity is tested against every and has the signed form in the definition (Weak derivative of a locally integrable function).
An element of is an almost-everywhere equivalence class of measurable representatives (The space as the quotient by null functions).
Hölder's inequality includes and , with (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases).
Countable Choice makes every compact subset of have finite Lebesgue measure (Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of has finite outer measure).
For integrable functions, equality almost everywhere is equivalent to equality of their integrals over every measurable set (Two integrable functions are equal almost everywhere exactly when all of their indefinite integrals agree).
Proof
Fix and put . By [F4], . For an representative , [F3] applied to and gives : for use (with when ), and for use . The derivatives are bounded and supported in , so all four test integrals in [F1] are finite.
Since almost everywhere, and are equal almost everywhere and integrable by step 1.1. By [F5] their integrals agree. The same argument applied to and gives equal right sides, including the sign .
Therefore the weak identity for holds for this test exactly when the weak identity for does. The test was arbitrary, proving both directions. By [F2] this is precisely independence from the representatives of classes.
Depends on
- Weak derivative of a locally integrable function
- The space $L^p(\mu)$ as the quotient by null functions
- Two integrable functions are equal almost everywhere exactly when all of their indefinite integrals agree
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ has finite outer measure
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
- Positive, negative, and truncated Sobolev functions Corollary
- Sobolev maxima and minima form a lattice Corollary
- Lp and Sobolev classes do not determine point values Counterexample
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms Definition
- A clipped affine function keeps its zero region Example
- The absolute value has a weak first derivative Example
- Linearity, locality, and commutation of weak derivatives Lemma
- The Sobolev norm descends to equivalence classes Lemma
- Weak derivatives persist under local Lp limits Lemma
- Integer-order W^k,2 and Hᵏ agree with equivalent norms Theorem
- Zero weak gradient gives componentwise constants Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
47 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Juha Kinnunen, Sobolev Spaces (2026), Chapter 1 §1.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations (2014), §3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)