How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cyclotomic Hecke algebras of level one are finite Hecke algebras
Statement
Let be a level-one fundamental weight and keep the conventions of Affine type-A presentations and charged cyclotomic quotients. Then the assignments () in the nondegenerate case and in the degenerate case extend to -algebra isomorphisms respectively (The generic type-A Hecke algebra, The standard basis of the generic type-A Hecke algebra).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , the level-one fundamental weight , the cyclotomic quotient of Affine type-A presentations and charged cyclotomic quotients, and the finite type-A Hecke algebra with quadratic relation , , respectively the group algebra .
At level one the cyclotomic relation reads in the nondegenerate branch and in the degenerate branch; the mixed relations give and , so every polynomial generator is expressible in the first one and the finite generators (Affine type-A presentations and charged cyclotomic quotients).
The finite Hecke algebra has standard basis ; the Jucys–Murphy elements in commute and satisfy and for , with the analogous multiplicative identities in (The Hecke Jucys-Murphy action is dominance triangular, The standard basis of the generic type-A Hecke algebra).
Proof
Given: The level-one quotient and the finite generators
(respectively ).
Surjectivity of the natural map. By [F1] the first polynomial generator is the scalar (respectively ), and the recursion expressing every (respectively ) in and (respectively ) shows that the algebra generated by the finite generators and is already generated by the finite generators alone. Hence the assignment of the Statement is a surjective algebra homomorphism.
The inverse in the nondegenerate branch. Let be the additive Jucys–Murphy element and put a product of units, so every is invertible; the commute because the do, and while for follow from [F2] by separating the term in and using the finite braid relation on the three affected transpositions. Setting therefore produces commuting units with , distant mixed commutation, the finite Hecke relations and . These elements satisfy the complete affine presentation, so the assignment defines a homomorphism fixing the .
The inverse in the degenerate branch. Put with . Direct transposition multiplication gives , hence , and the commute and commute with distant generators by [F2]; at this gives . These elements satisfy the degenerate affine relations, so the assignment defines a homomorphism fixing the .
Mutual inverses. The two constructions of steps 1.2 and 1.3 fix every finite generator, and the composites with the surjection of step 1.1 fix every presentation generator: the finite generators by construction, and the polynomial generators because both sides satisfy the same recursion from (respectively ) and the mixed relations. Hence both composites are the identity on a generating set, so the maps are mutually inverse isomorphisms; rank zero gives on both sides. This removes any late-basis or dimension dependency and introduces no BK or primitive-block input.
Remarks
The identification is proved by an explicit inverse rather than by comparing dimensions, so it does not depend on the later cyclotomic basis theorem, the BK isomorphism or any block-primitivity statement. No choice principle is used.
Depends on
Used by
- Affine and cyclotomic type-A Hecke algebras Definition
- Residue-sequence idempotents and cyclotomic Hecke blocks Definition
- The nondegenerate root-of-unity level-one Hecke regime Definition
- Projective and simple Grothendieck classes in a small non-semisimple block Example
- The degenerate level-one Hecke–KLR map for S₃ Example
- The level-one rank-two cyclotomic KLR algebra at e=3 Example
- Multipartitions with fixed component cores are cyclotomic Jantzen-connected Lemma
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jonathan Brundan and Alexander Kleshchev, Blocks of cyclotomic Hecke algebras and Khovanov-Lauda algebras, arXiv:0808.2032v3, Invent. Math. 178 (2009) 451–484 (complete 32-page article) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Alexander Kleshchev, Representation theory of symmetric groups and related Hecke algebras, arXiv:0909.4844v1, Bull. AMS 47 (2010) 419–481 (complete 66-page survey) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew Mathas, Hecke algebras and Schur algebras of the symmetric group, complete prepublication manuscript (AMS University Lecture Series 15, 1999), 79 pages (standard reference, not scraped)