Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exact adjoints induce adjoint operators on Grothendieck groups

Statement

Let k be a field and let A,B be finite-dimensional unital associative k-algebras. Write A-modfd and B-modfd for their categories of finite-dimensional left modules. Let F:A-modfd→B-modfd and G:B-modfd→A-modfd be exact k-linear adjoint functors F⊣G, and suppose F sends finite-dimensional projective modules to finite-dimensional projective modules. The induced maps F∗:K0(A)→K0(B) and G∗:G0(B)→G0(A) then satisfy

⟨F∗[P],[N]⟩B=⟨[P],G∗[N]⟩A

for every finite-dimensional projective left A-module P and finite-dimensional left B-module N.

For the graded analogue, let A,B be finite-dimensional unital associative Z-graded k-algebras, and let F,G be exact k-linear adjoints between their finite-dimensional graded-module categories with degree-zero maps. Assume F preserves finite graded projectives, and that there are natural degree-zero isomorphisms F(M{r})≅F(M){r} and G(N{r})≅G(N){r} for every r∈Z. The graded transposition is the one obtained from the degree-zero adjunction after using these shift isomorphisms. Then the induced maps F∗:K0gr(A)→K0gr(B) and G∗:G0gr(B)→G0gr(A) are Z[v,v−1]-linear and satisfy

⟨F∗x,y⟩B,gr=⟨x,G∗y⟩A,gr

for all x∈K0gr(A) and y∈G0gr(B). No axiom of choice is assumed or used.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The field k, finite-dimensional unital associative k-algebras A,B, exact k-linear adjoint functors as in the Statement, and the stated projective-preservation and graded-shift hypotheses. All module categories here use left modules; graded-category morphisms preserve degree.

[F1]

The ungraded pairing has value dim⁡kHom⁡A(P,M), and the graded pairing has value ∑dvddim⁡kHom⁡A,d(P,M); both descend to the stated Grothendieck groups (Projective Hom pairing descends and is graded sesquilinear).

[F2]

Exact functors induce maps on G0, and additive functors induce maps on split K0 (Universal properties and functoriality of G0 and split K0).

[F3]

For a locally small adjunction F⊣G, transposition is a natural bijection Hom⁡(FX,Y)≅Hom⁡(X,GY) with forward map u↦G(u)∘ηX (Under local smallness, transposition gives the natural hom-set bijection, and conversely).

[F4]

In a k-linear category each Hom space is a k-vector space and composition is k-bilinear; a k-linear functor acts k-linearly on Hom spaces (k-linear categories and k-linear functors).

[F5]

The category of left modules over a ring is abelian (Modules over a ring form an abelian category).

[F6]

The category GrMod⁡0(A) is abelian, with kernels, cokernels, finite biproducts, and exactness computed degreewise (Graded modules with degree-zero maps form an abelian category).

[F7]

An abelian category is additive, and an additive category is preadditive with all finite biproducts (Abelian category, Additive category).

[F8]

A category is locally small when every Hom-collection is a set (Small, locally small, and large categories).

[F9]

Projective modules lift maps through epimorphisms, and exact functors between abelian categories are additive (Projective modules and the lifting property, Exact functor between abelian categories).

[F10]

A finite graded projective lifts degree-zero maps through degree-zero epimorphisms (Finite graded projective modules).

[F11]

The shift is (M{r})i=Mi−r, and a homogeneous map of degree d sends Mi into Ni+d (Associative graded algebras, bimodules, and internal shifts, Graded balanced tensor product and homogeneous Hom).

[F12]

For finite-dimensional vector spaces V,W, dim⁡kHom⁡k(V,W)=(dim⁡kV)(dim⁡kW) (dim⁡FMm×n(F)=mn and dim⁡FL(V,W)=(dim⁡FV)(dim⁡FW) for finite-dimensional V,W).

[F13]

Finite-dimensional vector spaces over k are linearly isomorphic if and only if they have the same dimension (Two finite-dimensional vector spaces over F are linearly isomorphic if and only if they have the same dimension).

[F14]

For a graded (B,A)-bimodule, the graded tensor–Hom construction gives a natural degree-zero adjunction between tensoring and homogeneous Hom (Associative and graded bimodule tensor–Hom adjunction).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F4F5F6F7F8F9F10F12givenchooseconstructalgebra

The finite-dimensional left-module categories are essentially small abelian categories. In the ungraded case, [F5] makes the ambient module category abelian; kernels, cokernels, and finite biproducts of finite-dimensional modules remain finite-dimensional, so the full finite-dimensional subcategory is abelian by [F7]. For graded modules, [F6] gives the same conclusion degreewise. These categories are essentially small: every ungraded n-dimensional module is isomorphic to one on the standard vector space kn, and its possible actions form a set of functions satisfying the module identities. Every finite-dimensional graded module is similarly isomorphic to a standard graded vector space specified by a finite-support dimension vector Z→N; the possible graded actions on it form a set. Each such model uses bases only for one finite-dimensional object at a time. Morphisms are subsets of the set of linear maps between the underlying finite vector spaces, so the categories are locally small by [F4, F8, F12]. Their full subcategories of finite-dimensional projectives are essentially small and additive: zero objects and finite direct sums remain projective by the lifting properties in [F9, F10], and finite generation is preserved by taking the union of the finite generating families. Thus the universal group maps in [F2] apply to these categories.

1.2F3F4F12F13givenalgebra

For fixed P,N, the adjunction bijection [F3] is Φ(u)=G(u)∘ηP. Since G is k-linear by [F4] and composition is k-bilinear, Φ preserves addition and scalar multiplication: Φ(u+u′)=Φ(u)+Φ(u′) and Φ(λu)=λΦ(u). Thus the set bijection [F3] is a k-linear isomorphism. Both Hom spaces are finite-dimensional because they are subspaces of the finite-dimensional linear-map spaces from [F12]. Consequently [F13] gives dim⁡kHom⁡B(FP,N)=dim⁡kHom⁡A(P,GN).

2.1F2F9F10F11step 1.1givenconstruct

Exactness gives the induced maps on the two G0 groups by [F2]. The functor F is additive by [F9], and its projective-preservation hypothesis restricts it to an additive functor from finite projectives over A to those over B; [F2] therefore gives F∗ on split K0. The same reasoning applies in the graded categories. For every r, the natural shift isomorphisms identify F(M{r}) with F(M){r} and G(N{r}) with G(N){r}, so their induced maps commute with multiplication by vr. Hence all four induced maps are Z[v,v−1]-linear where applicable.

2.2F3F4F11step 1.2constructalgebra

For every d∈Z, a degree-d map F(P)→N is the same underlying map as a degree-zero map F(P){d}→N, by [F11]. Use the natural shift isomorphism αP,d:F(P{d})→≅F(P){d} and precompose with αP,d to obtain a degree-zero map F(P{d})→N. Apply the degree-zero adjunction bijection to the object P{d}; its output is a degree-zero map P{d}→G(N), which is exactly a degree-d map P→G(N) under the same shift convention [F11]. Each operation is a k-linear bijection, so Hom⁡B,d(F(P),N)≅Hom⁡A,d(P,G(N)) linearly. This constructs the degree-compatible graded transposition from the ordinary adjunction rather than replacing homogeneous Hom by all ungraded maps.

3.1F1step 2.1step 1.2construct

By [F1], the two sides of this dimension equality are respectively ⟨F∗[P],[N]⟩B and ⟨[P],G∗[N]⟩A. This proves the ungraded identity on projective and module class generators. Every element of either Grothendieck group is a finite integer linear combination of such classes, so the Z-bilinearity in [F1] extends the equality to all classes in the ungraded groups.

3.2F1step 2.1step 2.2construct

Taking dimensions in step 2.2 gives equality of every coefficient in hgr,B(F(P),N) and hgr,A(P,G(N)). The sums are finite by [F1]. Thus the graded pairing identity holds on projective and module class generators, and the Z-bilinearity in [F1] extends it to all x∈K0gr(A) and y∈G0gr(B). Step 2.1 gives Laurent-linearity of the induced operators.

4.1F14given∎

In the tensor–Hom setting of [F14], the functors F=M⊗A− and G=HOM⁡B(M,−) have the required degree-zero adjunction interface. This theorem applies to that instance only after exactness on the finite categories, finite-dimensionality of outputs, projective preservation by F, and the stated shift conditions have each been verified.

Remark

Kleshchev, §2.2, supplies graded shift and pairing conventions, not the adjointness identity. Khovanov–Seidel, §2e.1, author PDF p. 15, computes exact Grothendieck operators for the specific Am family and its projective basis; it is not a proof of the general adjunction theorem here.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

65 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources