Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Conditional uniqueness in the transversely anisotropic Calderon problem

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice.

Let (M,g) be a transversally anisotropic product domain of dimension n≥3, with compact transversal (M0,g0), and let q1,q2∈Cc∞(M∘,R). Assume zero is not a Dirichlet eigenvalue of either −Δg+qj, assume the unweighted scalar geodesic ray transform on M0 is injective on compactly supported smooth functions, and suppose the full Schrödinger Dirichlet-to-Neumann maps agree: Λq1=Λq2:H1/2(∂M)→H−1/2(∂M). Then q1=q2 on M.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the DN identity and CGO solver suppliers [F1]--[F2].

[A2]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) is inherited from the DN identity and CGO solver suppliers [F1]--[F2].

Given: the compact CTA product, real smooth interior-supported potentials, nonresonance of both operators, injectivity of the real scalar ray transform, and equality of full DN maps.

[F1]

Scalar conductivity and Schrödinger Dirichlet-to-Neumann maps: under nonresonance, each Schrödinger DN map is a full boundary map on H1/2(∂M) with normal derivative convention.

[F2]

Alessandrini identities for scalar conductivity and Schrödinger DN maps and Scalar conductivity and Schrödinger Dirichlet-to-Neumann maps: the Alessandrini Statement gives the Schrödinger identity for smooth boundary values, while the DN definition gives weak boundary forms on H1/2. The exact H1 solutions used below have only H1/2 traces, so step 1.1 derives the needed extension directly from those forms.

[F3]

Injective geodesic ray transform on a transversal manifold: if a real compactly supported smooth function has zero unweighted integrals over all nontangential transversal geodesics, then it is zero; the same implication for complex functions follows by applying the real statement to real and imaginary parts.

[F4]

Uniqueness of the L1 Fourier transform: two L1(R) functions with equal Fourier transforms are equal almost everywhere.

[F5]

CTA complex geometrical optics solvability and remainder bound now imports the H1 real-weight right solver with O(∣τ∣−1) L2 norm from Dos Santos Ferreira--Kurylev--Lassas--Salo, Proposition 2.1, PDF p. 10, with finite orientation-cover descent. The external result accepts arbitrary L2 forcing and both signs of the real weight, rather than only the particular transport amplitude in that supplier's Statement.

[F6]

CTA Gaussian-beam quasimodes and geodesic concentration supplies the normalized beam, arbitrarily small residual, and self-intersection ray limit, including nonorientable transversals by orientation-cover descent. The external source is Proposition 3.1, PDF p. 14, with the cross-term estimate on pp. 21--22. Proposition 2.2, PDF p. 11, gives the associated exact-solution correction. These external statements and the cross-term pages were inspected for the bounded repair; no complete new Carleman or beam proof is claimed.

Proof

Given: the data in the statement.

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

For exact H1 solutions uj let fj=tr⁡uj∈H1/2(∂M) and define aj(v,w)=∫M(g(∇gv,∇gw‾)+qjvw‾) dVg. By the weak DN definition, ⟨Λq1f1,f2⟩=a1(u1,u2). Let u~1∈H1(M) be the q2 solution with trace f1, which exists by nonresonant weak solvability. Then ⟨Λq2f1,f2⟩=a2(u~1,u2). Since u1−u~1∈H01(M) and u2 solves the q2 weak equation, a2(u1−u~1,u2)=a2(u2,u1−u~1)‾=0, where the conjugation uses real-valuedness of q2. Subtracting the weak pairings and using equality of the DN maps on all H1/2(∂M) gives ∫MQ(x1,x′)u1(x1,x′)u2(x1,x′)‾ dVg=0, where Q=q1−q2. This derives the needed weak-trace extension of [F2]. Because qj∈Cc∞(M∘) and M⋐R×M0∘, extension of Q by zero gives a smooth compactly supported function on R×M0.

2.1A1A2F5F6step 1.1algebra

Fix λ∈R, put s=τ+iλ, and choose the beam vs of [F6] with residual O(τ−K). Use the signed real-weight solver [F5] to obtain exact solutions u1=e−sx1(vs+r1),u2=esx1(vs+r2) for the respective potentials, with rj∈H1(M) and ∥rj∥2=O(τ−1). Indeed the conjugated residual is (−Δg0−s2)vs+qjvs, of bounded L2 norm on a fixed product cylinder; multiplication by e±iλx1 is bounded there. Correcting with the real-weight solver gives precisely this bound. Their product in step 1.1 is e−2iλx1(vs+r1)(vs‾+r2‾). Every error integral tends to zero by Cauchy--Schwarz, the boundedness of Q, ∥vs∥2=O(1), and ∥rj∥2=o(1). Integrating first in x1 gives the smooth compactly supported transversal test function Q^λ below. Applying [F6] proves the attenuated ray identity for every λ and every nontangential γ. This argument works on the base manifold; it does not assume injectivity of a ray transform on its orientation cover.

3.1F3givenstep 2.1inductionalgebra

Step 2.1 supplies ∫γQ^λ(γ(t))e−2λt dt=0for every real λ and every nontangential geodesic γ, where Q^λ(x′)=∫Re−2iλx1Q(x1,x′) dx1. At λ=0, [F3] gives Q^0=0. Assume inductively that ∂λjQ^0=0 for every j<k. Differentiate the ray identity k times at λ=0. Differentiation under the finite geodesic integral is valid because Q is smooth with compact x1 support. Leibniz' rule leaves the unweighted ray integral of ∂λkQ^0; all other terms contain lower derivatives and vanish by the induction hypothesis. Thus [F3], applied to real and imaginary parts, gives ∂λkQ^0=0. Induction proves that every Taylor coefficient of λ↦Q^λ(x′) vanishes for each fixed x′.

4.1F4step 3.1algebra∎

For each fixed x′, compact x1 support makes Q^λ(x′) entire in λ, so its zero Taylor series implies it vanishes for all real λ. This is the Fourier transform of the L1(R) function Q(⋅,x′) at every frequency 2λ; [F4] gives Q(⋅,x′)=0 almost everywhere. Smoothness of Q then yields Q=0 on M.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources