Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

L1 consistency of the mollified Biot-Savart kernel

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and the radial compactly supported mollifier of Smooth mollified Biot-Savart kernel. Write ∥F∥L1:=∫R2∣F(x)∣dx and let ∥g∥L∞ be the essential supremum of ∣g∣. There is a constant Cρ<∞, independent of ε>0, such that ∥Kε−K∥L1(R2)≤Cρε. Consequently, for every bounded measurable vorticity density ω, ∥(Kε−K)∗ω∥L∞≤Cρε∥ω∥L∞. This is an error estimate at fixed ε; it does not prove a singular-limit theorem for the particle dynamics.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The mollifier and kernel in Smooth mollified Biot-Savart kernel, and Countable Choice for polar integration.

[A1]

Assume Countable Choice for the polar-coordinate and L1 change-of-variables suppliers (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The mollifier is radial, nonnegative, supported in ∣z∣≤ε, and has mass one (Smooth mollified Biot-Savart kernel).

[F2]

Polar coordinates give ∫f(x)dλ2(x)=∫0∞∫S1f(rθ)r dσ(θ)dr for nonnegative Borel f (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).

[F3]

Taylor expansion through first order has a second-derivative remainder bounded along admitted segments (Multivariable Taylor formula with a Lagrange remainder along a line segment).

[F4]

Under Countable Choice, a C1 diffeomorphism obeys change of variables for L1 functions (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions).

Proof

1.1A1F1F2algebra

On ∣x∣≤2ε, [F2] and ∣K(x)∣≤(2π∣x∣)−1 give ∫∣x∣≤2ε∣K(x)∣dx≤Cε. Also ∣Kε(x)∣≤∥ρε∥∞∫∣w∣≤3ε∣K(w)∣dw≤Cρ/ε, so its integral over this disk is at most Cρε.

1.2F1F3F4F5algebra

First, each component zjρε(z) is integrable because it is bounded and compactly supported. Radiality makes it odd under the reflection z↦−z; applying [F4] to that reflection, whose Jacobian determinant has absolute value one, gives ∫zjρε(z) dz=−∫zjρε(z) dz, hence every first-moment component is zero. Now fix ∣x∣>2ε and ∣z∣≤ε. The segment from x to x−z is contained in the open ball B∣x∣/2(x), which is convex and avoids the origin, and each second coordinate derivative of K(w)=w⊥/(2π∣w∣2) is bounded there by C∣x∣−3: direct differentiation gives terms of the forms c wi∣w∣−4 and c wiwjwk∣w∣−6. Apply the scalar Taylor theorem [F3] to each component of K along this segment. The coordinate remainders are each bounded by C∣z∣2∣x∣−3, so [F5] gives the vector bound K(x−z)=K(x)−DK(x)z+R(x,z) with ∣R(x,z)∣≤C∣z∣2∣x∣−3. Integrating in z against ρε, the linear term vanishes by the just-proved first-moment identity, and ∫∣z∣2ρε(z)dz≤ε2. Hence ∣Kε(x)−K(x)∣≤Cε2∣x∣−3.

2.1F2step 1.1step 1.2algebra

Integrating the bound in step 1.2 by [F2] over ∣x∣>2ε gives at most Cε2∫2ε∞r−3rdr σ(S1)≤Cε. Together with step 1.1 this proves the stated L1 estimate.

3.1step 2.1algebra∎

For each x, the convolution difference is absolutely bounded by ∫∣Kε(x−y)−K(x−y)∣ ∣ω(y)∣dy≤∥Kε−K∥1∥ω∥∞. Taking the essential supremum in x and using step 2.1 proves the force estimate.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

61 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources