Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 3 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 3 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Interacting particle mean field and vortex blob error

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The mean-field model uses a globally Lipschitz two-variable interaction kernel and probability measures with finite first moment. Under Countable Choice, characteristic solutions are constructed in a complete weighted continuous-path space and are unique on every finite interval; characteristic solutions satisfy the weak transport identity. Equal-weight empirical particle measures satisfy that identity exactly. Dobrushin stability propagates every prescribed initial coupling with factor e2Lt; the factor reflects the stated two-variable Lipschitz convention. The force-defect extension adds the two bounded characteristic-force residuals before taking the coupling infimum, without assuming an optimal coupling exists.

The two-dimensional vortex branch permits real signed particle weights. It defines the mollified Biot–Savart kernel, proves smoothness and a global Lipschitz bound at each fixed blob width, and estimates its L1 difference from the singular kernel. Signed vorticity uses bounded-Lipschitz dual discrepancy and separate positive/negative transport couplings with matching Jordan masses. Under the stated Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice assumptions, the regularized signed characteristic flow exists uniquely and preserves total variation. The signed Dobrushin estimate retains the total variation mass, sign-preserving transport, integrable path suprema, and bounded force defects. Probability W1 is reserved for its probability setting.

Spatial force evaluation and time integration contribute separate errors. The finite tensor Simpson evaluator has explicit invalid-domain, invalid-panel-count, and evaluation-failure statuses; its fourth-derivative estimate bounds the exact-arithmetic vector quadrature residual. Classical RK4 is controlled by a stage-wise Lipschitz estimate and a uniform exact-start defect on a common compact convex tube for the jointly C4 particle field. Its global fourth-order bound uses a recurrence for the exact/numerical start pair at each grid step; it requires numerical grid states and those paired stages in the tube and both one-step maps defined, exact initialization, and retains the zero-stability-constant branch. These conditional tube hypotheses do not assert numerical invariance or floating-point accuracy.

The signed vortex-blob error budget combines initial split-coupling error, blob regularization, the common smooth Simpson force residual, and RK4 particle displacement. It assumes separately matched positive and negative Jordan masses, consolidated initial atoms, sign-preserving exact transport, and all stated derivative and tube bounds. The same-sign companion obtains its probability W1 estimate directly from couplings. Constants can depend on the blob width, particle count, and tube; the estimates supply no uniform singular-limit conclusion as the blob width tends to zero.

A separate separable canonical Hamiltonian provides a vortex-inspired comparison model. On its open admitted kick/drift domain, leapfrog is reversible, symplectic, and locally volume preserving; the latter uses Countable Choice for measurable change of variables. Its second-order trajectory estimate additionally requires the stated compact convex tube and bounded derivatives. This second-order canonical system is distinct from the first-order weighted Biot–Savart dynamics, so its geometric conclusions are not transferred to that dynamics.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

Bounded-Lipschitz dual discrepancy for finite signed measures

Definition

Let ω,ν be finite signed Borel measures on Rd such that ∣ω−ν∣(Rd)<∞. For each bounded Lipschitz test function, integration against ω−ν is defined by Integration against a signed or complex measure, and the class L^1(nu) = L^1(|nu|); boundedness and finite total variation make every test in the following set integrable. Set ∥ϕ∥∞:=sup⁡x∣ϕ(x)∣ and Lip⁡(ϕ):=sup⁡x≠y∣ϕ(x)−ϕ(y)∣/∣x−y∣, with Lip⁡(ϕ)=0 when d=0, using the Euclidean norm from The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn. Define the bounded-Lipschitz dual discrepancy dBL(ω,ν):=sup⁡{∣∫ϕ d(ω−ν)∣:∥ϕ∥∞≤1, Lip⁡(ϕ)≤1}. The integral bound by total variation shows this supremum is finite. This page uses only the displayed dual quantity and makes no separate metric-separation claim. No Jordan decomposition, positivity, or probability normalization is needed.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Globally Lipschitz mean-field interaction kernel

Definition

Let d≥1, with the Euclidean norm from The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn. An interaction kernel is a continuous map K:Rd×Rd→Rd. It is globally Lipschitz with constant L≥0 in the convention used on this page if ∣K(x,y)−K(x′,y′)∣≤L(∣x−x′∣+∣y−y′∣) for all x,y,x′,y′∈Rd. This implies the linear-growth estimate ∣K(x,y)∣≤∣K(0,0)∣+L(∣x∣+∣y∣). The notation L always refers to this two-variable convention; the stability factor below is therefore 2L.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

Smooth mollified Biot-Savart kernel

Definition

In this definition only, use the local one-based coordinate names z1:=z(0) and z2:=z(1) for z∈R2, whose coordinate domain is {0,1} as in The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn. Let z⊥=(−z2,z1) and G(z)=12πlog⁡∣z∣,K(z)=∇⊥G(z)=z⊥2π∣z∣2(z≠0). The locally integrable value assigned to K(0) is immaterial. Fix a radial, nonnegative smooth bump ρ supported in the unit ball with ∫ρ=1; its scaled family is the mollifier family of The mollifier family generated by a unit-mass smooth bump. Put ρε(z)=ε−2ρ(z/ε), Gε=G∗ρε, and Kε=K∗ρε. The kernel is a regularized interaction; its smoothness and global Lipschitz property are proved in a separate lemma. It does not define the singular physical interaction at a collision.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

The coupling definition of the 1-Wasserstein distance

Definition

Let d≥1. For Borel probability measures μ,ν on Rd with finite first moments ∫∣x∣ dμ(x)<∞ and ∫∣y∣ dν(y)<∞, let Π(μ,ν) be the set of Borel probability measures on Rd×Rd whose first and second marginals are μ and ν. Define W1(μ,ν):=inf⁡π∈Π(μ,ν)∫Rd×Rd∣x−y∣ dπ(x,y). This definition makes no assertion that the infimum is attained. It applies only to probability measures with finite first moment; it is not a distance assigned here to a general signed measure.

Here ∣⋅∣ is the Euclidean norm from The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn, and probability measure has the meaning of Probability measures and probability spaces.

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Sign-preserving transport cost for finite signed measures

Definition

Assume d≥1 and the Axiom of Choice when invoking Jordan decomposition of a signed measure into unique mutually singular positive parts. Let ω,ν be finite signed Borel measures on Rd whose total variations have finite first moments, and use the Euclidean norm from The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn. Write their Jordan parts as ω+,ω− and ν+,ν−. If the positive-part masses agree and the negative-part masses agree, define using finite nonnegative Borel measures π± on Rd×Rd whose first and second marginals are respectively the corresponding positive or negative Jordan parts: C±(ω,ν):=inf⁡π+,π−(∫∣x−y∣dπ+(x,y)+∫∣x−y∣dπ−(x,y)), where π+ ranges over finite nonnegative couplings of ω+ and ν+, and π− over finite nonnegative couplings of ω− and ν−. The infimum is over both sign couplings independently. This cost is not the probability W1.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

Completeness of the weighted continuous trajectory space

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let (E,A,μ) be a probability space, T>0, and d≥1. Use the Euclidean norm of The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn. Let X be the space, modulo equality μ-almost everywhere, of jointly measurable maps X:[0,T]×E→Rd whose paths are continuous for almost every label and whose time-supremum function is measurable, and for which ∥X∥X:=∫Esup⁡0≤t≤T∣Xt(z)∣dμ(z)<∞. In this formula and in ∥X−Y∥X, take the supremum on a measurable conull set where the relevant paths are continuous and extend it by zero off that set; equality almost everywhere means equality of whole paths outside one measurable null set. The seminorm identifies maps equal almost everywhere, and the induced distance dX(X,Y)=∥X−Y∥X is a metric on the quotient; it is complete.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, a probability space (E,A,μ), T>0, and the norm and equivalence convention in the Statement.

[F2]

Tonelli's theorem passes a sum of nonnegative measurable functions through the integral (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F3]

Completeness means every Cauchy sequence converges in the metric (Complete metric space: every Cauchy sequence converges in the space).

[A1]

Countable Choice permits choosing one measurable representative for each member of a countable sequence of equivalence classes (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F5]

Countable suprema and pointwise limits of measurable real-valued functions are measurable (Sequential suprema, infima, limsup, liminf, and pointwise limits of measurable functions are measurable).

[F6]

Sections of product-measurable functions are measurable, and the Borel sigma-algebra of a finite Euclidean product is the product of the coordinate Borel sigma-algebras (Every section of a product-measurable function is measurable, The Borel product of R^m and R^n is the Borel sigma-algebra of R^{m+n}).

[F7]

A nonnegative measurable function with finite integral is finite almost everywhere (A nonnegative measurable function with finite integral is finite almost everywhere).

Proof

1.1A1F4F5F6givenconstruct

Let (Xn) be Cauchy in dX. By [A1], choose measurable representatives and, for each representative, a measurable conull set on which its paths are continuous. Countable Choice gives these sets simultaneously; their intersection C∈A is conull. For a fixed countable dense set D⊆[0,T], continuity on C gives sup⁡0≤t≤T∣Xm(t,z)−Xn(t,z)∣=sup⁡q∈D∣Xm(q,z)−Xn(q,z)∣(z∈C). Each fixed-time section of each coordinate is measurable by [F6], since coordinate projections are continuous, and the right side is measurable by [F5]. Define it to be zero on Cc; this is a measurable representative of the time-supremum difference, as prescribed in the Statement. Changing the conull set or the representative does not change its integral. Symmetry and the triangle inequality follow pointwise on a common conull set, and a zero distance forces the paths to agree almost everywhere: for a nonnegative measurable supremum g with zero integral, μ{g>1/j}≤j∫g=0 for every j≥1. It is integrable because on C it is bounded by the sum of the two given integrable path suprema.

2.1A1F2F5F7step 1.1choose

Choose increasing indices nk successively as the least indices large enough that ∥Xm−Xn∥X≤2−k whenever m,n≥nk. Put gk(z)=sup⁡t∣Xnk+1(t,z)−Xnk(t,z)∣ on C and gk(z)=0 off C. By step 1.1 each gk is measurable and ∫Egk dμ≤2−k. Thus G=∑k=1∞gk is measurable by [F5], and Tonelli gives ∫EG dμ≤∑k=1∞2−k<∞. By [F7], A:=C∩{G<∞} is measurable and conull. For every z∈A, the paths Xnk(⋅,z) are uniformly Cauchy on [0,T].

3.1F1F4F5F6F7step 2.1

Replace each selected representative by X~nk(t,z)=Xnk(t,z) on A and 0 outside A. These maps remain jointly measurable and represent the same equivalence classes. By [F1], for each z∈A their uniform limit is a continuous path X(⋅,z); set X(⋅,z)=0 off A. The coordinate projections of X~nk are measurable, so their pointwise limits are measurable by [F5]; [F6] makes the resulting map into Rd jointly measurable. Its time-supremum function is measurable because its paths are continuous and the supremum equals the countable supremum over D of measurable sections. On A, sup⁡t∣Xt−X~nk,t∣≤∑j≥kgj; off A this difference is zero. Hence the integrable series tail bounds ∥X−Xnk∥X and tends to zero. Since Xnk has finite norm, [F4] gives ∥X∥X<∞.

4.1F3F4step 3.1algebra∎

Since the original sequence is Cauchy and its subsequence converges to X, the triangle inequality gives ∥Xn−X∥X→0: for any ϵ>0, first take k with ∥Xnk−X∥<ϵ/2, then take n beyond the Cauchy index so ∥Xn−Xnk∥<ϵ/2. Thus every Cauchy sequence converges, which is completeness by [F3].

AlgorithmAlgorithm: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

Tensor composite Simpson force evaluator on a rectangle

Definition

Input real endpoints a,b,c,d, integer panel counts nx,ny, and an exact evaluation oracle that, when queried at a point, returns either a value in R2 or evaluation-failure. First, if a≥b or c≥d, return invalid-domain without querying the oracle. Next, if either panel count is odd or is less than two, return invalid-panel-count without querying the oracle. For the remaining inputs set R=[a,b]×[c,d], hx=(b−a)/nx, hy=(d−c)/ny, xi=a+ihx for 0≤i≤nx, and yj=c+jhy for 0≤j≤ny. Query the oracle at every grid point in lexicographic order with i first and j second, storing the returned values. If a query fails, stop at the first such point and return evaluation-failure with that point. Otherwise, for each j form the continuous piecewise-linear interpolant through the stored values F(xi,yj) and apply Composite Simpson rule on an even uniform grid componentwise in x to this interpolant, obtaining Gj=QxF(⋅,yj). Form the continuous piecewise-linear interpolant through the stored Gj and apply the same valid Simpson procedure componentwise in y to obtain QyG=QyQxF. Return this vector QyQxF. Each interpolant is queried only at its stored grid nodes, so no new oracle call is needed. Both calls to the supplier use strictly ordered endpoints and even panel counts at least two. This is an exact-real procedure; termination and force-accuracy bounds are established in Tensor composite Simpson error for a two-dimensional force integral ↗, and floating-point roundoff is outside its scope.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Characteristic solution of a probability mean-field equation

Definition

Fix T>0, a globally Lipschitz kernel K as in Globally Lipschitz mean-field interaction kernel, and a Borel probability measure μ0 on Rd with finite first moment as in The coupling definition of the 1-Wasserstein distance. A characteristic solution on [0,T] consists of a jointly Borel map X:[0,T]×Rd→Rd, defined up to a μ0-null set of labels, such that t↦Xt(x) is absolutely continuous for μ0-almost every x, X0(x)=x, and Xt(x)=x+∫0t∫RdK(Xs(x),Xs(y)) dμ0(y) ds for μ0-almost every x. It transports μ0 to μt=(Xt)#μ0, where (Xt)#μ0(A):=μ0(Xt−1(A)). The weighted path integrability convention is ∫Rdsup⁡0≤t≤T∣Xt(x)∣dμ0(x)<∞; in particular every time slice has finite first moment.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

Equal-probability mean-field and weighted signed vortex particle systems

Definition

For a globally Lipschitz interaction kernel K and N≥1, the equal-probability mean-field particle system is x˙i(t)=1N∑j=1NK(xi(t),xj(t)),i=1,…,N. Its empirical probability measure is μN(t)=N−1∑iδxi(t).

For a mollified two-dimensional Biot-Savart kernel Kε from Smooth mollified Biot-Savart kernel and real weights Γ1,…,ΓN, the weighted signed vortex particle system is x˙i(t)=∑j=1NΓjKε(xi(t)−xj(t)),i=1,…,N, with vorticity measure ωN(t)=∑iΓiδxi(t). If Γi=1/N and K(x,y)=Kε(x−y), the first system is the probability special case. The weighted signed system is a first-order Biot-Savart model.

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

Characteristic solution for a finite signed regularized vorticity

Definition

Assume AC. Let ω0 be a finite signed Borel measure on R2, set M=∣ω0∣(R2), and let ω0=ω0+−ω0− be its Jordan decomposition. The Jordan total-variation formula gives M=ω0+(R2)+ω0−(R2). If M=0, its characteristic solution is the constant zero measure curve. If M>0, set E=R2×{+1,−1} with sigma-algebra B(R2)⊗2{+1,−1}, and define the probability measure λ0 by λ0(A×{s})=ω0s(A)/M for Borel A and s∈{+1,−1}; its total mass is one by the displayed formula. A signed characteristic solution for the regularized kernel Kε on [0,T] is a jointly measurable path map Z:[0,T]×E→R2, modulo λ0-almost everywhere equality, with absolutely continuous paths for almost every label, Z0(x,s)=x, and

Zt(x,s)=x+M∫0t∫ErKε(Zu(x,s)−Zu(y,r)) dλ0(y,r) du,

such that its time-supremum function is measurable and ∫Esup⁡0≤t≤T∣Zt(x,s)∣ dλ0(x,s)<∞. It represents the signed measure curve

ωt=M∫Es δZt(x,s) dλ0(x,s).

Here ω0s denotes ω0+ when s=+1 and ω0− when s=−1. The total variation mass is M at time zero, and the sign coordinate records each Jordan part separately.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedOpen item page →

The mollified Biot-Savart kernel is smooth and globally Lipschitz

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and the mollifier of Smooth mollified Biot-Savart kernel. For every ε>0, Gε and Kε are C∞ on R2, and there is Cρ<∞ independent of ε such that sup⁡x∈R2∥DKε(x)∥op≤Cρε−2. Consequently Kε is globally Lipschitz with constant at most Cρε−2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, the singular kernel K(z)=z⊥/(2π∣z∣2), a smooth radial compactly supported unit-mass mollifier ρε, and ε>0.

[A1]

Assume Countable Choice for the smooth convolution and polar-coordinate suppliers (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Convolution of a locally integrable function with a smooth compactly supported mollifier is smooth, and derivatives pass to the mollifier (Convolution with a mollifier is smooth, and derivatives pass under the integral sign).

[F2]

Polar coordinates give the integral of a nonnegative radial function on R2 (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).

Proof

1.1A1F1F2givenalgebra

By [F1], Gε and Kε are smooth and DKε(x)=∫R2K(x−z)Dρε(z)dz, componentwise. The gradient Dρε is supported in ∣z∣≤ε and satisfies ∥Dρε∥∞=ε−3∥Dρ∥∞. If ∣x∣≤2ε, then ∣x−z∣≤3ε. Since ∣K(w)∣≤(2π∣w∣)−1, polar integration [F2] gives ∫∣w∣≤3ε∣K(w)∣dw≤Cε. Thus ∥DKε(x)∥≤Cρε−2 in this region.

2.1F1F3step 1.1algebra

If ∣x∣>2ε and ∣z∣≤ε, then ∣x−z∣>∣x∣/2 and ∣K(x−z)∣≤C/∣x∣. Scaling [F3] gives ∥Dρε∥1=ε−1∥Dρ∥1, so ∥DKε(x)∥≤C∣x∣∥Dρε∥1≤Cρε−2. Combining this with step 1.1 yields the global derivative bound.

3.1F4step 2.1∎

Apply [F4] to the smooth map Kε along the segment between any x,y∈R2. The derivative bound in step 2.1 gives ∣Kε(x)−Kε(y)∣≤Cρε−2∣x−y∣. This is the claimed global Lipschitz property.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedOpen item page →

The bounded-Lipschitz dual discrepancy is bounded by split transport cost

Statement

Assume AC for the Jordan decompositions in Sign-preserving transport cost for finite signed measures. Let d≥1. If finite signed Borel measures ω,ν on Rd have the same positive-part mass and the same negative-part mass, and their total variations have finite first moments, then the couplings in C±(ω,ν) exist, C±(ω,ν)<∞, and dBL(ω,ν)≤C±(ω,ν).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The signed measures and matching Jordan-part masses of the Statement, with finite first moments of their total variations.

[A1]

Assume the Axiom of Choice for existence of the Jordan parts (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Jordan decomposition gives positive mutually singular parts ω+,ω− and ν+,ν− (Jordan decomposition of a signed measure into unique mutually singular positive parts, Measures on sigma-algebras).

[F2]

The product of finite measures exists with the product marginals, and Tonelli integrates nonnegative costs (For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique, Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product); the product sigma-algebra of Euclidean Borel spaces is the Euclidean product Borel sigma-algebra (The Borel product of R^m and R^n is the Borel sigma-algebra of R^{m+n}). The Euclidean triangle inequality gives ∣x−y∣≤∣x∣+∣y∣ (Cauchy-Schwarz ∣⟨x,y⟩∣≤∥x∥2∥y∥2 with its equality case, the triangle inequality for ∥⋅∥2, the parallelogram law and polarisation). Also, ∣ω∣=ω++ω− and ∣ν∣=ν++ν−; hence each Jordan part is dominated by its total variation measure. For a nonnegative simple function, the simple integral is monotone under this measure domination by its defining finite sum; taking the supremum over simple minorants in the nonnegative integral definition gives ∫∣x∣dωσ≤∫∣x∣d∣ω∣ and the analogous bound for νσ (For a signed measure, total variation is nu-plus plus nu-minus, finite partitions suffice, and nu-plus and nu-minus are extremal, The nonnegative Lebesgue integral, The integral of a nonnegative simple function).

[F3]

The definitions of dBL and C± use tests bounded by one with Lipschitz constant at most one, and positive/negative couplings (Bounded-Lipschitz dual discrepancy for finite signed measures, Sign-preserving transport cost for finite signed measures).

Proof

1.1A1F1F2givenconstruct

For a sign with common mass m>0, the measure (ωσ⊗νσ)/m has marginals ωσ,νσ by [F2]; its cost is at most ∫∣x∣dωσ+∫∣y∣dνσ<∞ by ∣x−y∣≤∣x∣+∣y∣ and [F2]. If m=0, both parts vanish and the zero measure is a coupling. Applying this to each sign proves nonempty finite-cost coupling sets.

2.1F3step 1.1algebra

Fix any admissible π+,π− and any test ϕ in [F3]. The marginals give ∫ϕd(ω−ν)=∫(ϕ(x)−ϕ(y))dπ+−∫(ϕ(x)−ϕ(y))dπ−. Each absolute integrand is at most ∣x−y∣ by the Lipschitz bound. Thus ∣∫ϕd(ω−ν)∣ is at most the sum of the two coupling costs.

3.1F3step 1.1step 2.1∎

Taking the supremum over tests and then the infimum over the nonempty coupling sets in step 1.1 proves dBL(ω,ν)≤C±(ω,ν)<∞. No minimizing coupling is used.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedOpen item page →

The coupling infimum is finite for finite-first-moment probabilities

Statement

If μ,ν are Borel probability measures on Rd with finite first moments, then Π(μ,ν) is nonempty and W1(μ,ν)<∞ for the definition in The coupling definition of the 1-Wasserstein distance.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Borel probability measures μ,ν on Rd and ∫∣x∣dμ,∫∣y∣dν<∞.

[F1]

W1 is the infimum of the coupling costs over Borel probability couplings with the stated marginals (The coupling definition of the 1-Wasserstein distance).

[F2]

The product of two sigma-finite measures exists and has the prescribed marginal measures (For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique); for Euclidean Borel measures this product is a Borel measure on the Euclidean product (The Borel product of R^m and R^n is the Borel sigma-algebra of R^{m+n}).

[F3]

Tonelli's theorem permits iterated integration of nonnegative measurable functions on the product (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

Proof

1.1givenF1F2construct

Both probability measures are finite, hence sigma-finite. Their product μ⊗ν is a Borel probability measure with marginals μ and ν by [F2], so it belongs to Π(μ,ν) by [F1].

2.1F1F3F4step 1.1algebra∎

The Euclidean inequality [F4] and Tonelli [F3], together with the marginals from step 1.1, give ∫∣x−y∣d(μ⊗ν)≤∫∣x∣dμ+∫∣y∣dν<∞. The infimum in [F1] is nonnegative and no larger than this finite coupling cost.

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

Separable regularized vortex-inspired Hamiltonian comparison system

Definition

For N≥2, real weights Γi, and ε>0, define the open collision-free configuration set Qcf:={q=(q1,…,qN)∈(R2)N:qi≠qj for i≠j}. Let q∈Qcf and p=(p1,…,pN)∈(R2)N. Let Hε(q,p)=12∑i=1N∣pi∣2+Vε(q),Vε(q)=∑i<jΓiΓjGε(qi−qj), where Gε is from Smooth mollified Biot-Savart kernel. This is a separable canonical Hamiltonian on Qcf; its local leapfrog map is the partial composition One-step leapfrog map as force and drift shears restricted as in Local domain restriction for kick, drift, and leapfrog maps. It is a distinct second-order canonical comparison model, not the first-order Biot-Savart vortex system of Equal-probability mean-field and weighted signed vortex particle systems.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedOpen item page →

Dobrushin stability in 1-Wasserstein distance for mean-field flows

Statement

Let K have two-variable Lipschitz constant L as in Globally Lipschitz mean-field interaction kernel, and let μt,νt be characteristic solutions from probability measures with finite first moments. For every t∈[0,T], W1(μt,νt)≤e2LtW1(μ0,ν0). The estimate is proved for every prescribed initial coupling before taking the infimum; existence of an optimal coupling is not assumed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Two characteristic solutions for the same kernel K, with finite-first-moment initial probabilities.

[F1]

The two-variable kernel difference is at most L(∣x−x′∣+∣y−y′∣) (Globally Lipschitz mean-field interaction kernel).

[F2]

Each solution is the pushforward of its initial law by its characteristic flow (Characteristic solution of a probability mean-field equation); the coordinatewise Borel pair maps take values in the Euclidean product Borel space (The Borel product of R^m and R^n is the Borel sigma-algebra of R^{m+n}).

[F3]

The relevant W1 values are finite by the product-coupling bound (The coupling infimum is finite for finite-first-moment probabilities).

[F4]

Tonelli and Fubini justify the nonnegative bounds and exchanges over the coupling and time variables (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F5]

Dominated convergence gives continuity of the transported cost from the integrable path supremum (Dominated convergence).

[L1]

If u(t)≤a+∫0tbu(s)ds for nonnegative continuous u and constants a,b≥0, then u(t)≤aebt (Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients).

Proof

1.1F2F3F5construct

Fix any π0∈Π(μ0,ν0) and transport it by the two flows: πt=(Xt,Yt)#π0. Its marginals are μt,νt. Set D(t)=∫∣Xt(x)−Yt(y)∣dπ0(x,y). This is finite and continuous by the first moments, the integrable path suprema, and [F5].

2.1F1F2F3F4F5L1step 1.1

For each initial pair, subtract the characteristic equations and apply [F1]. Integrating over π0 yields D(t)≤D(0)+2L∫0tD(s)ds, because the first coordinate difference contributes LD(s), while the averaged interaction-coordinate difference contributes another LD(s) by the marginal identities of π0. Applying [L1] gives D(t)≤e2LtD(0). Since πt is an admissible coupling, [F3] implies W1(μt,νt)≤e2Lt∫∣x−y∣dπ0.

3.1F3step 2.1∎

The inequality in step 2.1 holds for every π0∈Π(μ0,ν0). Taking the infimum of its right side gives the Statement by the definition of W1 in [F3]; no minimizer is required.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedOpen item page →

Exact weak mean-field identity for empirical particle measures

Statement

Let x1,…,xN solve the equal-probability system of Equal-probability mean-field and weighted signed vortex particle systems on [0,T], and put μN(t)=N−1∑iδxi(t). Then for every φ∈Cc1(Rd), ∫φdμN(t)−∫φdμN(0)=∫0t∫∇φ(x)⋅(∫K(x,y)dμN(s)(y))dμN(s)(x)ds. Thus the empirical measure satisfies the same weak transport equation exactly, with no particle quadrature error in this identity.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A classical particle solution, the particle equations, and a test function φ∈Cc1(Rd).

[F1]

The equal-probability particle system is x˙i=N−1∑jK(xi,xj) and its empirical law is N−1∑iδxi (Equal-probability mean-field and weighted signed vortex particle systems).

[F2]

The chain rule differentiates t↦φ(xi(t)) (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a)).

Proof

1.1F1F2algebra

By [F2] and [F1], ddt1N∑iφ(xi(t))=1N2∑i,j∇φ(xi(t))⋅K(xi(t),xj(t)). The double sum is finite, so integration in time gives the left side of the Statement as its time integral.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

Expanding both empirical integrals on the right of the Statement gives exactly the same finite double sum as in step 1.1. This proves the identity for every t and includes repeated particle positions without a distinctness assumption.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedOpen item page →

Global characteristic flow for a globally Lipschitz mean-field kernel

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let K be globally Lipschitz with constant L in the convention of Globally Lipschitz mean-field interaction kernel, and let μ0 be a Borel probability measure on Rd with finite first moment. For every finite T>0 there exists a characteristic solution on [0,T] in the sense of Characteristic solution of a probability mean-field equation. It is unique up to equality of trajectories for μ0-almost every label. No compact support assumption is needed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, the kernel, probability measure, and finite first moment in the Statement.

[F1]

The kernel satisfies ∣K(x,y)∣≤∣K(0,0)∣+L(∣x∣+∣y∣) and the two-variable Lipschitz bound (Globally Lipschitz mean-field interaction kernel).

[F2]

The weighted continuous path space over a probability label space with integrable initial path is complete (Completeness of the weighted continuous trajectory space).

[F4]

The product probability measure exists, Tonelli applies to its nonnegative integrands, and the product Borel sigma-algebra agrees with the Euclidean product Borel sigma-algebra (For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique, Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, The Borel product of R^m and R^n is the Borel sigma-algebra of R^{m+n}).

[F5]

Dominated convergence passes a pointwise limit through an integral under one integrable majorant (Dominated convergence).

[A1]

Countable Choice supplies representatives in the weighted-path completeness proof (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F6]

The natural numbers are cofinal in the reals (Every complete ordered field is Archimedean).

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F2F4F5construct

On a time interval [a,a+δ], use the space in [F2] over (Rd,μ0) and fix the initial label map Xa. Define Φ(Z)t(x)=Xa(x)+∫at∫K(Zs(x),Zs(y))dμ0(y)ds. The growth bound in [F1], the integrability of Xa, and [F4] make the time integral finite in the weighted norm. For almost every label, the integrand is continuous in time; it is dominated in the second label by ∣K(0,0)∣+L(sup⁡s∣Zs(x)∣+sup⁡s∣Zs(y)∣), integrable by the path norm, so [F5] makes each output path continuous. The space is nonempty because the constant-in-time path Xa belongs to it.

2.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1choose

For any Z,W, applying [F1], integrating first over the label x and then y, and using that μ0 has mass one gives ∥ΦZ−ΦW∥≤2Lδ∥Z−W∥. Choose δ>0 with 2Lδ<1 when L>0; if L=0 any finite δ works. The contraction theorem [F3] yields a unique fixed point on this interval.

3.1F1F2F6step 1.1step 2.1algebra

The bound in step 2.1 applies on each successive interval with the attained endpoint path as initial data. By [F6], choose an integer J>2LT and partition [0,T] into J equal intervals (or use one interval when L=0); each interval then has length below 1/(2L) and successive fixed points construct the solution on all of [0,T]. Each fixed point belongs to the weighted path space, so its endpoint has finite first moment and is admissible for the next interval.

4.1F1F2F3step 3.1step 2.1∎

Any two solutions on the first interval are fixed points of the same contraction and hence agree by [F3]. Repeating on each successive interval gives equality for μ0-almost every label on all of [0,T]. The fixed point equation and the pushforward definition give exactly the characteristic solution in [F1] and Characteristic solution of a probability mean-field equation.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedOpen item page →

Weak transport identity for characteristic mean-field solutions

Statement

Let μt=(Xt)#μ0 be the characteristic solution for a globally Lipschitz kernel on [0,T]. For every φ∈Cc1(Rd) and t∈[0,T], ∫φ dμt−∫φ dμ0=∫0t∫Rd∇φ(x)⋅(∫RdK(x,y)dμs(y))dμs(x)ds.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A characteristic solution in the weighted path-integrability convention of Characteristic solution of a probability mean-field equation, a globally Lipschitz kernel, and φ∈Cc1(Rd). The proof is conditional on that solution.

[F1]

The flow equation and pushforward formula hold for the characteristic solution (Characteristic solution of a probability mean-field equation); coordinatewise Borel maps into Euclidean products are Borel by the product-sigma identification (The Borel product of R^m and R^n is the Borel sigma-algebra of R^{m+n}).

[F3]

Fubini exchanges integrals for absolutely integrable functions on sigma-finite product spaces (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F4]

Tonelli integrates the nonnegative linear-growth bounds and proves absolute integrability (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F5]

Dominated convergence passes pointwise convergence through an integral under an integrable majorant (Dominated convergence).

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F4F5

For μ0-almost every label x, the path Xs(x) is absolutely continuous. For a fixed label, its velocity is continuous in time: the integrand converges pointwise for almost every second label and is dominated by the integrable path supremum in the definition, so [F5] applies. Thus its path is C1, and the ordinary chain rule [F2] and defining ODE [F1] give φ(Xt(x))−φ(x)=∫0t∇φ(Xs(x))⋅∫K(Xs(x),Xs(y))dμ0(y)ds. The integrand is absolutely integrable over time and both labels: ∇φ is bounded, and [F1] bounds ∣K(Xs(x),Xs(y))∣ by a constant plus L(∣Xs(x)∣+∣Xs(y)∣), whose label integrals are finite uniformly in s. This last bound and [F4] justify the exchanges; [F5] supplies the stated velocity continuity.

2.1F1F3step 1.1∎

Integrate step 1.1 in x against μ0. The left side becomes the two displayed measure integrals by the pushforward formula [F1]. By [F3] and the absolute-integrability check in step 1.1, exchange the time and label integrals. Replacing Xs(x),Xs(y) by their pushforward variables gives the right side of the Statement.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedOpen item page →

L1 consistency of the mollified Biot-Savart kernel

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and the radial compactly supported mollifier of Smooth mollified Biot-Savart kernel. Write ∥F∥L1:=∫R2∣F(x)∣dx and let ∥g∥L∞ be the essential supremum of ∣g∣. There is a constant Cρ<∞, independent of ε>0, such that ∥Kε−K∥L1(R2)≤Cρε. Consequently, for every bounded measurable vorticity density ω, ∥(Kε−K)∗ω∥L∞≤Cρε∥ω∥L∞. This is an error estimate at fixed ε; it does not prove a singular-limit theorem for the particle dynamics.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The mollifier and kernel in Smooth mollified Biot-Savart kernel, and Countable Choice for polar integration.

[A1]

Assume Countable Choice for the polar-coordinate and L1 change-of-variables suppliers (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The mollifier is radial, nonnegative, supported in ∣z∣≤ε, and has mass one (Smooth mollified Biot-Savart kernel).

[F2]

Polar coordinates give ∫f(x)dλ2(x)=∫0∞∫S1f(rθ)r dσ(θ)dr for nonnegative Borel f (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).

[F3]

Taylor expansion through first order has a second-derivative remainder bounded along admitted segments (Multivariable Taylor formula with a Lagrange remainder along a line segment).

[F4]

Under Countable Choice, a C1 diffeomorphism obeys change of variables for L1 functions (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions).

Proof

1.1A1F1F2algebra

On ∣x∣≤2ε, [F2] and ∣K(x)∣≤(2π∣x∣)−1 give ∫∣x∣≤2ε∣K(x)∣dx≤Cε. Also ∣Kε(x)∣≤∥ρε∥∞∫∣w∣≤3ε∣K(w)∣dw≤Cρ/ε, so its integral over this disk is at most Cρε.

1.2F1F3F4F5algebra

First, each component zjρε(z) is integrable because it is bounded and compactly supported. Radiality makes it odd under the reflection z↦−z; applying [F4] to that reflection, whose Jacobian determinant has absolute value one, gives ∫zjρε(z) dz=−∫zjρε(z) dz, hence every first-moment component is zero. Now fix ∣x∣>2ε and ∣z∣≤ε. The segment from x to x−z is contained in the open ball B∣x∣/2(x), which is convex and avoids the origin, and each second coordinate derivative of K(w)=w⊥/(2π∣w∣2) is bounded there by C∣x∣−3: direct differentiation gives terms of the forms c wi∣w∣−4 and c wiwjwk∣w∣−6. Apply the scalar Taylor theorem [F3] to each component of K along this segment. The coordinate remainders are each bounded by C∣z∣2∣x∣−3, so [F5] gives the vector bound K(x−z)=K(x)−DK(x)z+R(x,z) with ∣R(x,z)∣≤C∣z∣2∣x∣−3. Integrating in z against ρε, the linear term vanishes by the just-proved first-moment identity, and ∫∣z∣2ρε(z)dz≤ε2. Hence ∣Kε(x)−K(x)∣≤Cε2∣x∣−3.

2.1F2step 1.1step 1.2algebra

Integrating the bound in step 1.2 by [F2] over ∣x∣>2ε gives at most Cε2∫2ε∞r−3rdr σ(S1)≤Cε. Together with step 1.1 this proves the stated L1 estimate.

3.1step 2.1algebra∎

For each x, the convolution difference is absolutely bounded by ∫∣Kε(x−y)−K(x−y)∣ ∣ω(y)∣dy≤∥Kε−K∥1∥ω∥∞. Taking the essential supremum in x and using step 2.1 proves the force estimate.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedOpen item page →

Signed Dobrushin stability with bounded force defects

Statement

Assume AC and Countable Choice. Let Kε have one-variable Lipschitz constant Lε; then (x,y)↦Kε(x−y) has two-variable constant Lε. Let ω0,ν0 have separately matching positive and negative Jordan masses and total variation mass M. For M>0, use the Jordan-label probability spaces of Characteristic solution for a finite signed regularized vorticity and suppose their path maps Xtω(x,s) and Xtν(y,s) have integrable time suprema, satisfy X0ω(x,s)=x and X0ν(y,s)=y, and represent ωt,νt by the signed pushforward formula there. Assume at each time the positive and negative label pushforwards are the Jordan parts. Write utω(x)=∫Kε(x−z)dωt(z),utν(y)=∫Kε(y−z)dνt(z). Suppose their absolutely continuous sign-labelled trajectories satisfy X˙tω(x,s)=utω(Xtω(x,s))+rω(t,x,s),X˙tν(y,s)=utν(Xtν(y,s))+rν(t,y,s) for almost every time and almost every label of sign s∈{+,−}, with ∣rω∣≤ηω and ∣rν∣≤ην on [0,T]. For every prescribed initial pair of sign-preserving couplings of total cost D0, dBL(ωt,νt)≤C±(ωt,νt)≤e2LεMt(D0+M(ηω+ην)t). If M=0, both curves are zero and the inequalities hold with zero right side. Taking the infimum over initial couplings in the M>0 case gives the same bound with D0=C±(ω0,ν0), without assuming attainment.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Two signed-label path representations as specified in the Statement, equal positive-part and negative-part masses, common total variation mass M, and measurable label defects bounded by the stated constants.

[A2]

Assume Countable Choice for the mollified-kernel Lipschitz supplier (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The mollified Biot-Savart kernel is smooth and globally Lipschitz).

[F1]

For every sign-matched coupling, the bounded-Lipschitz dual discrepancy is at most its split transport cost (The bounded-Lipschitz dual discrepancy is bounded by split transport cost).

[F2]

The one-variable bound ∣Kε(a)−Kε(b)∣≤Lε∣a−b∣ and ∣(x−y)−(x′−y′)∣≤∣x−x′∣+∣y−y′∣ give the stated two-variable estimate (The mollified Biot-Savart kernel is smooth and globally Lipschitz, Cauchy-Schwarz ∣⟨x,y⟩∣≤∥x∥2∥y∥2 with its equality case, the triangle inequality for ∥⋅∥2, the parallelogram law and polarisation).

[F3]

The bounded-Lipschitz dual discrepancy uses bounded 1-Lipschitz tests (Bounded-Lipschitz dual discrepancy for finite signed measures); C± is the infimum over separate positive and negative Borel couplings (Sign-preserving transport cost for finite signed measures). The coordinatewise Borel path maps give Borel pair maps on the Euclidean product (The Borel product of R^m and R^n is the Borel sigma-algebra of R^{m+n}).

[F4]

Gronwall bounds a nonnegative continuous function satisfying the resulting integral inequality (Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients).

[F6]

Dominated convergence gives continuity of the transported cost from integrable path suprema (Dominated convergence).

[F7]

Matching Jordan masses and finite first moments give nonempty finite-cost sign-coupling sets, including the zero-mass case (The bounded-Lipschitz dual discrepancy is bounded by split transport cost).

Proof

1.1A1givenF3F6construct

If M=0, the zero-mass condition and equality of total variation masses make ωt=νt=0, so all conclusions hold. Suppose M>0. Fix the prescribed couplings π0+,π0−. Transport each by the corresponding two characteristic flows to obtain couplings πt+,πt−. Let D(t)=∑s∈{+,−}∫∣Xtω(x,s)−Xtν(y,s)∣dπ0s(x,y). The initial-position identities give D(0)=D0. Their marginals are the Jordan parts at time t by the sign-preservation assumption, so [F3] gives C±(ωt,νt)≤D(t). Integrable path suprema and [F6] make D continuous.

2.1A1A2F2F4F5F6step 1.1algebra

For a coupled pair, subtract the two label equations. Decompose each signed interaction into its positive and negative Jordan-label integrals and apply [F2]. The interaction difference is at most LεM∣Xω−Xν∣+LεD(t): the first term uses total variation mass M, and the inner second-coordinate differences integrate to the two transported coupling costs whose sum is D(t). The defects add at most ηω+ην. Integrating this pointwise estimate against the outer couplings, whose total mass is M, yields D(t)≤D0+2LεM∫0tD(s)ds+M(ηω+ην)t. The last term and D0 are nondecreasing, so [F4] gives the displayed exponential bound.

3.1F1F3F7step 1.1step 2.1∎

Apply [F1] and step 1.1 to obtain the bounded-Lipschitz estimate. By [F7], the initial coupling sets are nonempty and their infimum is finite; taking the infimum of the step 2.1 bound gives the stated result with D0=C±(ω0,ν0). No infimum is assumed to be attained.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedOpen item page →

Characteristic existence and total-variation preservation for regularized signed vorticity

Statement

Assume AC and Countable Choice. Let ω0 be a finite signed Borel measure on R2 whose total variation has finite first moment, and let Kε be the smooth mollified Biot-Savart kernel of Smooth mollified Biot-Savart kernel. There is a unique signed characteristic solution in the sense of Characteristic solution for a finite signed regularized vorticity on every finite interval [0,T], and it represents the measure curve with velocity ut(x)=∫Kε(x−y)dωt(y),ωt=(Xt)#ω0. The flow is a homeomorphism of R2 at each time and ∣ωt∣(R2)=∣ω0∣(R2). If ω0=0, the only transported measure curve is identically zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite signed Borel measure with finite first moment of its total variation, T>0, and the stated smooth globally Lipschitz kernel.

[A2]

Countable Choice is used for the weighted continuous path space completeness supplier (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), Completeness of the weighted continuous trajectory space).

[F1]

The mollified kernel is smooth and globally Lipschitz for fixed ε (The mollified Biot-Savart kernel is smooth and globally Lipschitz).

[F2]

The signed characteristic solution uses the Jordan-label probability and the weighted path integrability convention (Characteristic solution for a finite signed regularized vorticity).

[F5]

Gronwall bounds a nonnegative function satisfying a linear integral inequality (Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients).

[F6]

Dominated convergence passes the kernel integral through continuous time changes under an integrable path-supremum bound (Dominated convergence).

[F8]

For M>0, the Jordan-label probability has first moment M−1∫R2∣x∣ d∣ω0∣(x). For nonnegative simple functions this follows by summing the defining label masses on the two sign components and using ∣ω0∣=ω0++ω0−; increasing simple approximation and monotone convergence extend the equality to ∣x∣ (For a signed measure, total variation is nu-plus plus nu-minus, finite partitions suffice, and nu-plus and nu-minus are extremal, The nonnegative Lebesgue integral, The integral of a nonnegative simple function, Every nonnegative measurable function is the increasing limit of simple measurable functions, Monotone convergence for the integral).

[F9]

The label product measure exists and Tonelli justifies the nonnegative label bounds. For each fixed sign pair, composing the Borel label maps with the continuous kernel after forming the pair is measurable in the Euclidean product Borel sigma-algebra; the finite sign coordinates are handled componentwise (For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique, Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, The Borel product of R^m and R^n is the Borel sigma-algebra of R^{m+n}).

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F2F7F8construct

Let M=∣ω0∣(R2). If M=0, [F7] implies ω0=0, the represented curve is zero by [F2], and ut=0 has the identity flow; all claims follow. Hence suppose M>0. By [A1], write ω0=ω0+−ω0− with mutually singular positive parts. The definition [F2] supplies the label probability λ0 on E=R2×{+1,−1}, with λ0(A×{s})=ω0s(A)/M; [F8] and the assumed total-variation moment give its finite first moment.

2.1A2F1F3F9step 1.1construct

On a subinterval [a,a+T′], use the weighted path space over (E,λ0) and fix the attained initial label map Za (with Z0(x,s)=x at the first interval). The constant-in-time path Za shows the space is nonempty. Define Φ(Z)t(x,s)=Za(x,s)+M∫at∫ErKε(Zu(x,s)−Zu(y,r))dλ0(y,r)du. Linear growth and the integrable path supremum make this a well-defined continuous-path map; [F9] supplies measurability of the paired kernel integrand. The Lipschitz bound in [F1] gives ∥ΦZ−ΦW∥≤2MLεT′∥Z−W∥ on each interval. Choose T′<1/(2MLε) (any finite T′ if Lε=0); [F3] gives a unique fixed point. Its endpoint has finite first moment by the weighted path norm, so the same construction restarts there; finitely many intervals cover [0,T].

3.1A1F1F2F6step 2.1

The fixed point defines the curve in [F2]. The positive and negative label masses remain fixed, and its signed integral defines ut(x)=∫Kε(x−y)dωt(y). The integrable path supremum and [F6] give dominated continuity in t; [F1] gives spatial Lipschitz constant at most MLε and at most linear growth.

4.1F1F4F5step 2.1step 3.1

By [F4], the velocity field has a unique maximal flow from each point. The linear-growth estimate and [F5] bound every trajectory on [0,T] by a finite constant depending on its initial point, T, M, and ε. A bounded trajectory has a limit at any finite endpoint because its derivative is bounded on the resulting compact time-state set; local existence at that endpoint extends it. Hence the maximal flow ϕt exists for all [0,T]. Each label path from step 2.1 solves this same ODE from its initial position, so ODE uniqueness gives Zt(x,s)=ϕt(x) for λ0-almost every label. Solving the time-reversed equation gives an inverse; Gronwall [F5] applied to two initial states in both time orientations makes the forward and inverse maps Lipschitz on each finite interval. Thus each time map is a homeomorphism and both Jordan parts follow that common position flow.

5.1A1F2F3F7step 2.1step 4.1∎

The initial Jordan parts are mutually singular by [A1]. The common homeomorphism in step 4.1 transports a witnessing disjoint Borel partition to a disjoint Borel partition, so their pushforwards remain mutually singular. They are therefore the Jordan parts of ωt; their masses are unchanged by pushforward under the bijection. Thus ∣ωt∣(R2)=ω0+(R2)+ω0−(R2)=M by [F7]. Every solution in [F2] is a fixed point of the same contraction on each subinterval, so uniqueness in [F3] gives uniqueness of the represented curve.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedOpen item page →

Probability W1 stability under bounded force defects

Statement

Let K have two-variable global Lipschitz constant L as in Globally Lipschitz mean-field interaction kernel. Let μt=(Xt)#μ0 and νt=(Yt)#ν0 be probability curves from finite-first-moment initial laws, with absolutely continuous characteristic paths satisfying X˙t(x)=∫K(Xt(x),Xt(z))dμ0(z)+rμ(t,x),Y˙t(y)=∫K(Yt(y),Yt(w))dν0(w)+rν(t,y) for almost every time and almost every label, with X0(x)=x and Y0(y)=y. Assume additionally the weighted path integrability conditions ∫sup⁡s≤T∣Xs∣dμ0<∞ and ∫sup⁡s≤T∣Ys∣dν0<∞. Assume the measurable label defects satisfy ∣rμ∣≤ημ and ∣rν∣≤ην on [0,T]. For every prescribed initial coupling π0 of cost D0, its transport by the two characteristic paths has cost at time t at most e2Lt(D0+(ημ+ην)t). Consequently W1(μt,νt)≤e2Lt(W1(μ0,ν0)+(ημ+ην)t). The estimate is first proved for each coupling; no optimal plan is assumed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Two characteristic flows for the same kernel, finite-first-moment probability initial laws, bounded label defects, and a fixed initial coupling.

[F1]

The two-variable kernel difference is at most L(∣x−x′∣+∣y−y′∣) (Globally Lipschitz mean-field interaction kernel).

[F2]

The jointly Borel path and pushforward conventions are those in Characteristic solution of a probability mean-field equation; the force-defect equations are assumptions of the Statement, replacing the unforced equation in that definition; the coordinatewise Borel pair maps define pushforwards in the Euclidean product Borel space (The Borel product of R^m and R^n is the Borel sigma-algebra of R^{m+n}).

[F3]

Product coupling shows the initial W1 infimum is finite (The coupling infimum is finite for finite-first-moment probabilities).

[F4]

Gronwall gives u(t)≤a(t)ebt when u(t)≤a(t)+b∫0tu(s)ds and a is nondecreasing (Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients).

[F5]

Tonelli and Fubini justify integration of the coupled force bounds over the two label measures and time (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product, Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F6]

Dominated convergence gives continuity of the transported cost from the integrable path suprema (Dominated convergence).

Proof

1.1F2F3F6construct

Transport the prescribed coupling by the two flows: πt=(Xt,Yt)#π0. Its marginals are μt,νt. Put D(t)=∫∣Xt(x)−Yt(y)∣dπ0(x,y). This is finite and continuous by the first moments, integrable path suprema, and [F6].

2.1F1F2F4F5F6step 1.1

Subtract the two characteristic equations and apply [F1, F5]. Integrating over the outer coupling, whose mass is one, gives D(t)≤D0+2L∫0tD(s)ds+(ημ+ην)t. The inhomogeneous term is nondecreasing, so [F4] yields D(t)≤e2Lt(D0+(ημ+ην)t). Since πt is a coupling, this is the asserted transported-coupling bound.

3.1F3step 2.1∎

The bound in step 2.1 holds for every initial coupling. Taking the infimum over their costs gives the claimed W1 inequality by [F3] and the definition of W1.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedOpen item page →

Exact weak transport identity for weighted signed vortex particles

Statement

Let xi:[0,T]→R2 be C1 trajectories with fixed real weights Γi, and let g:[0,T]×R2→R2 be a common continuous force correction. Suppose x˙i(t)=∑j=1NΓjKε(xi(t)−xj(t))+g(t,xi(t)), where Kε is the mollified kernel in Equal-probability mean-field and weighted signed vortex particle systems. For ωN(t)=∑iΓiδxi(t) and every φ∈Cc1(R2), ∫φdωN(t)−∫φdωN(0)=∫0t∫∇φ(x)⋅(∫Kε(x−y)dωN(s)(y)+g(s,x))dωN(s)(x)ds. In particular, the uncorrected regularized particle system satisfies the same weak identity with g=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The weighted particle paths, fixed weights, common continuous force correction, and φ∈Cc1(R2).

[F1]

The weighted system and its signed particle measure use the finite sums x˙i=∑jΓjKε(xi−xj) and ωN=∑iΓiδxi (Equal-probability mean-field and weighted signed vortex particle systems).

Proof

1.1givenF1F2algebra

By [F2] and the ODE in the Statement, ddt∑iΓiφ(xi(t))=∑i,jΓiΓj∇φ(xi(t))⋅Kε(xi(t)−xj(t))+∑iΓi∇φ(xi(t))⋅g(t,xi(t)). All sums are finite, so integrating this equality in time is valid.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

Expanding the two signed-measure integrals on the right of the Statement gives exactly the two finite sums in step 1.1. The left side is the weighted test sum at times t and 0, so integration of step 1.1 proves the identity.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedOpen item page →

One-step Lipschitz bound for classical RK4 on an admitted tube

Statement

Let f:[0,T]×U→Rm be uniformly L-Lipschitz in its state variable on a set containing every stage generated by the classical RK4 step of The explicit Euler, midpoint, and classical fourth-order Runge–Kutta tableaus from any two admitted starting states u,v at the same base time t. Assume all these stage evaluations are defined, and let Ψh(t,⋅) be the resulting one-step map for 0<h≤h0. Then ∣Ψh(t,u)−Ψh(t,v)∣≤(1+L∗h)∣u−v∣,L∗=LeLh0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The explicit RK4 stage equations, a time-dependent vector field uniformly Lipschitz in state with constant L, admitted stages at common stage times, and 0<h≤h0.

[F1]

An explicit tableau has stages Yi=u+h∑j<iaijKj and output u+h∑ibiKi (Explicit Runge–Kutta tableaus, stage maps, and failure status).

[F2]

The classical RK4 coefficients are (1/2,1/2,1) in the stage rows and (1/6,1/3,1/3,1/6) in the output (The explicit Euler, midpoint, and classical fourth-order Runge–Kutta tableaus).

Proof

1.1F1F2F3givenalgebra

Put δ=∣u−v∣ and let di=∣Ki(t,u)−Ki(t,v)∣. The stage times are identical for the two starting states. The stage equations [F1]-[F2] and the uniform state-Lipschitz assumption give, in order, d1≤Lδ,d2≤L(1+hL/2)δ,d3≤L(1+hL/2+h2L2/4)δ, and d4≤L(1+hL+h2L2/2+h3L3/4)δ. Each bound follows by substituting the preceding stage bound into ∣f(ti,Yi(u))−f(ti,Yi(v))∣≤L∣Yi(u)−Yi(v)∣.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra∎

The output formula in [F1]-[F2] gives ∣Ψh(t,u)−Ψh(t,v)∣≤(1+hL+12(hL)2+16(hL)3+124(hL)4)δ≤ehLδ. For h≤h0, ehL−1=∫0hLesds≤hLeLh0, so ehL≤1+L∗h. This proves the claim.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedOpen item page →

Local geometric properties and second-order error of the separable regularized vortex-inspired leapfrog

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Fix the particle count N≥2, real weights Γi, and ε>0. Let Hε(q,p)=12∣p∣2+Vε(q) be the separable Hamiltonian of Separable regularized vortex-inspired Hamiltonian comparison system. On an open collision-free configuration set, restrict the leapfrog step to states whose kick and drift stages remain in that set, as in Local domain restriction for kick, drift, and leapfrog maps. Then every admitted step has the following properties:

  1. it is reversible: its inverse on its image is the admitted step with signed step size −h;
  2. it is symplectic on its open admitted domain;
  3. it preserves local phase volume, meaning Lebesgue measure of every measurable set and its image agree; and
  4. for a fixed T>0 and integer n≥1, with h=T/n>0 sufficiently small and exact initialization, if Vε∈C3 and the exact path, numerical states, every kick/drift stage, and every line segment required by Local and finite-time trajectory error for symplectic Euler and leapfrog lie in a common compact convex tube K⋐Qcf×(R2)N independent of n, with derivatives of the Hamiltonian vector field through order two bounded there, the global trajectory error is O(h2) on [0,T].

Claims 1–3 concern every signed admitted step; claim 4 has the stated positive-step tube hypotheses. The symplecticity and order-two conclusions use the exact hypotheses of the suppliers Local leapfrog and kick-then-drift symplectic Euler are symplectic and Local and finite-time trajectory error for symplectic Euler and leapfrog. This canonical second-order Hamiltonian is a comparison model; it is not the first-order Biot-Savart particle system.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The smooth separable Hamiltonian, open collision-free domain, admitted local steps, Countable Choice, and (for claim 4) T>0, n≥1, exact initialization, the compact convex tube, and bounded derivatives through order two of the Hamiltonian vector field.

[A1]

Assume Countable Choice for measurable change of variables (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Leapfrog is the symmetric composition of half-kicks and a full drift; the local restriction admits exactly those stages lying in the open configuration set (One-step leapfrog map as force and drift shears, Local domain restriction for kick, drift, and leapfrog maps).

[F2]

Under V∈C2 and the admitted-domain hypotheses, local leapfrog is symplectic (Local leapfrog and kick-then-drift symplectic Euler are symplectic).

[F3]

Under V∈C3 and the stated compact convex tube, local leapfrog has global order two and its explicit finite-time error estimate (Local and finite-time trajectory error for symplectic Euler and leapfrog).

[F5]

Under Countable Choice, a C1 diffeomorphism between open sets satisfies change of variables for nonnegative measurable functions (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions).

Proof

1.1F1algebra

Write the kick and drift as Kh/2 and Dh. Their inverses are K−h/2 and D−h. Since the composition is Kh/2∘Dh∘Kh/2, its inverse on the image is K−h/2∘D−h∘K−h/2, exactly the admitted local step with signed size −h. This proves reversibility on the partial-map domains.

1.2givenF2F3

The potential Vε is smooth on the collision-free open set. The admitted local partial map therefore satisfies the hypotheses of [F2], which proves symplecticity. Under the compact convex tube and derivative assumptions in the Given clause, [F3] gives en≤eLTe0+CVTeLTh2; exact initialization has e0=0, so the finite-time global error is at most CVTeLTh2.

1.3A1F1F4F5algebra

On every admitted open kick domain the kick Ka(q,p)=(q,p−a∇Vε(q)) has derivative (I0−aD2Vε(q)I). The drift Db(q,p)=(q+bp,p) has derivative (IbI0I). Both are block triangular with identity diagonal blocks, so each has determinant one by [F4]. The local composition is a C1 diffeomorphism from its open admitted domain onto its open image, and multiplicativity [F4] gives determinant one for the composition. Applying [F5] to the map and its inverse yields equality of Lebesgue measures for every measurable set and its image.

2.1F3step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3∎

Steps 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 prove reversibility, symplecticity and local volume preservation; the bound derived from [F3] proves order two on precisely the stated tube. No energy-conservation or modified-energy conclusion is used.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

Tensor composite Simpson error for a two-dimensional force integral

Statement

Let a<b, c<d, let nx,ny≥2 be even integers, and set R=[a,b]×[c,d], hx=(b−a)/nx, hy=(d−c)/ny. If F∈C4(R,R2) and M40=max⁡R∣∂x4F∣,M04=max⁡R∣∂y4F∣, then the tensor evaluator of Tensor composite Simpson force evaluator on a rectangle satisfies ∣∫RF−QyQxF∣≤2 ∣R∣180(hx4M40+hy4M04),∣R∣=(b−a)(d−c). Here and in applications of this estimate, F∈C4(R,R2) means that each coordinate of F is the restriction to R of a scalar C4 function on an open neighborhood of R, in the sense of Ck maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space. The displayed derivatives are taken coordinatewise from these extensions; their values on R are independent of the extensions, since the extensions agree on the interior and their derivatives are continuous up to the boundary.

On every declared input, if each oracle query returns a value or evaluation-failure, the evaluator terminates with its specified status. For the valid inputs above, with the exact oracle returning F at every grid point, the evaluator terminates and returns a vector after exactly (nx+1)(ny+1) oracle queries. This is an exact-arithmetic quadrature bound, not a roundoff estimate.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The rectangle, even panel counts, F∈C4(R,R2), and the derivative bounds in the Statement.

[F1]

The tensor evaluator applies the one-dimensional composite Simpson rule successively in each coordinate (Tensor composite Simpson force evaluator on a rectangle).

[F2]

For a scalar C4 function on an interval of length B−A with even panel count and width h, Simpson error is at most (B−A)h4max⁡∣f(4)∣/180 (Composite Simpson error bound for a four-times continuously differentiable function).

[F3]

The composite Simpson weights are nonnegative and sum to the interval length (Composite Simpson rule on an even uniform grid).

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F4F5algebra

Invalid endpoints or panel counts return immediately without queries. Otherwise, the grid is finite, and any failed query returns immediately. If no query fails, each supplier call uses an evaluable interpolant, admissible panel counts and a finite sum, so the evaluator returns a vector. For the valid inputs in the error bound, there are exactly (nx+1)(ny+1) grid points; the exact oracle returns F at each, so none of the valid-input queries fails. The remaining supplier calls use evaluable interpolants, even positive panel counts and finite sums. Thus the evaluator terminates with a vector after the stated number of oracle queries. Fix a component Fk, k=0,1, and write Ix,Iy for exact integration and Sx,Sy for the composite Simpson operators. Add and subtract IySxFk: IyIxFk−SySxFk=Iy(Ix−Sx)Fk+(Iy−Sy)SxFk. The maxima in the Statement are finite by [F4]. By [F5], each coordinate of a vector has absolute value at most its Euclidean norm, so ∣∂x4Fk∣≤M40 and ∣∂y4Fk∣≤M04 on R. For each fixed y, [F2] bounds the first one-dimensional error by (b−a)hx4M40/180; integrating in y gives (b−a)(d−c)hx4M40/180.

2.1F2F3step 1.1

The y derivative commutes with the finite x-weighted sum. Applying [F2] to each fixed x and then summing the nonnegative Simpson weights from [F3] bounds the second term by (b−a)(d−c)hy4M04/180. Thus each coordinate error is at most E=∣R∣(hx4M40+hy4M04)/180.

3.1F5step 2.1algebra∎

If both coordinate errors have absolute value at most E, their Euclidean norm is at most (E2+E2)1/2=2E. Substitution of the value of E from step 2.1 proves the Statement.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedOpen item page →

Fourth-order global error for RK4 on a regularized vortex particle tube

Statement

Fix ε>0, finitely many vortex weights, T>0, and the regularized finite-particle vector field of Equal-probability mean-field and weighted signed vortex particle systems, possibly with an added common smooth force correction gq(t,X,xi) for spatial force quadrature. Suppose the resulting nonautonomous state field f(t,X) is jointly C4 on an open time-state domain, with derivatives through order four bounded on a common compact convex tube T compactly contained in that domain. Assume the exact path, RK4 grid states, and every RK4 stage lie in that tube for h=T/N≤h0, and the common force correction is included in these bounds. Let C4 be a uniform exact-start defect constant, so the local defect is at most C4h5 as in One-step ODE methods, local defect, uniform order, and step stability. Let L∗ be the stability constant from One-step Lipschitz bound for classical RK4 on an admitted tube, so the one-step factor is 1+L∗h. For exact initialization, the state errors Ek satisfy max⁡0≤k≤NEk≤{C4eL∗T−1L∗h4,L∗>0,C4Th4,L∗=0. The tube and stage-admissibility assumptions are conditional; no invariance or global numerical-domain claim is made. The constant C4 may depend on ε, particle count, the quadrature field, and the tube.

For every step k, assume all RK4 stages generated from both the exact start x(tk) and the numerical start Xk lie in T, and both one-step maps are defined. Let L be a uniform operator-norm bound for DXf on T and set L∗=LeLh0, as in the stability lemma. The only admitted start pair used in the stability estimate at step k is (x(tk),Xk).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The smooth nonautonomous finite-particle field, the common tube, bounded derivatives through order four, exact initialization, and admitted RK4 stages from both the exact and numerical starts at each step.

[F1]

Classical RK4 has local order at least four for a C4 autonomous field with bounded derivatives and exact-start stages in a compact convex tube; adjoining the time equation t′=1 gives the same local order for the stated nonautonomous field (Orders and scalar stability functions of Euler, midpoint, and classical RK4).

[F2]

The one-step defect is measured from the exact starting state, and local order four means a uniform O(h5) bound (One-step ODE methods, local defect, uniform order, and step stability).

[F3]

For the exact/numerical start pair at each grid step, the RK4 map is Lipschitz with factor at most 1+L∗h when all stages from both starts are admitted (One-step Lipschitz bound for classical RK4 on an admitted tube).

[F4]

The finite recurrence ek+1≤(1+Lh)ek+Chp+1 has the stated exponential bound (Finite geometric error bound from a one-step recurrence).

[F6]

A uniform operator-norm bound on the state derivative makes each fixed-stage-time restriction L-Lipschitz along line segments contained in the convex tube: the chain rule differentiates the restriction to the segment, and the vector mean-value inequality bounds its endpoint difference (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a), The mean value inequality: if f:[a,b]→Rm is continuous and differentiable on (a,b) with ∥f′∥2≤M, then ∥f(b)−f(a)∥2≤M(b−a)).

Proof

1.1givenF1F2

Apply [F1] to the autonomous augmentation (t,X)′=(1,f(t,X)). The time component is integrated exactly by RK4 because its weights sum to one; the state component therefore has the same exact-start defect order. The tube and derivative assumptions in the Given clause make the defect uniform, so [F2] gives the bound C4h5.

2.1F2F3F5F6step 1.1algebra

Put Ek=∣Xk−x(tk)∣ for the numerical and exact grid states. Applying [F3] to the admitted exact/numerical start pair, using [F6] for the state Lipschitz premise, bounds the one-step map difference by (1+L∗h)Ek. The exact-start local defect is at most C4h5 by step 1.1 and [F2]. The Euclidean triangle inequality [F5] therefore gives Ek+1≤(1+L∗h)Ek+C4h5, with E0=0.

3.1F4step 2.1∎

Apply [F4] with p=4, C0=0, C=C4, L=L∗, and the recurrence from step 2.1. Its L∗>0 and L∗=0 cases are exactly the displayed bound.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

Mean-field vortex blob error budget with signed particles, force quadrature, and RK4

Statement

Assume AC and Countable Choice. Let ωt be a smooth finite signed vorticity density on [0,T]×R2 with finite first moment, transported by a sign-preserving characteristic flow Xt satisfying ωt=(Xt)#ω0 and X˙t(x)=(K∗ωt)(Xt(x)), where K is the singular kernel in Smooth mollified Biot-Savart kernel. Assume sup⁡t≤T∥ωt∥∞≤W, ∫sup⁡t≤T∣Xt(x)∣d∣ω0∣(x)<∞, and the flow transports each Jordan part to the corresponding Jordan part. Put M=∣ω0∣(R2). Let ωN0=∑i=1NΓiδxi0 be a finite signed particle measure whose positive and negative Jordan masses respectively equal those of ω0, with finite first moment, and with consolidated atoms whose positive and negative supports are disjoint; thus ∑i∣Γi∣=M. Let E0=C±(ω0,ωN0)<∞.

Fix ε>0. For every time and force location (t,x), suppose the force integrand Ft,x:R→R2 lies in C4(R,R2) and its fourth partial derivatives satisfy the uniform bounds M40,M04. Let the tensor Simpson evaluator use the even panel counts and widths in Tensor composite Simpson error for a two-dimensional force integral, and define its residual by rq(t,x)=QyQxFt,x−∫RFt,x. Thus ηq=2∣R∣180(hx4M40+hy4M04). Assume this residual is the same correction function for every particle, sup⁡t,x∣rq(t,x)∣≤ηq, and the corrected regularized particle flow preserves the two Jordan parts. Write xiε,q for the exact solution from xi0 of x˙iε,q(t)=∑j=1NΓjKε(xiε,q(t)−xjε,q(t))+rq(t,xiε,q(t)), and set ωNε,q(t)=∑iΓiδxiε,q(t). Assume the resulting nonautonomous field f(t,X) is jointly C4 on an open time-state domain D, with derivatives through order four bounded on a common compact convex tube T⋐D containing all exact paths and RK4 stages. Let xih(T) be the RK4 states from the same initial data for this ODE, and define ωN,hε,q(T)=∑iΓiδxih(T). Let h=T/n≤h0 for an integer n≥1 and define CRK:=C4(eL∗T−1)/L∗ if L∗>0, and CRK:=C4T if L∗=0, where C4,L∗,h0 are the constants in Fourth-order global error for RK4 on a regularized vortex particle tube. Then dBL(ωT,ωN,hε,q(T))≤e2LεMT(E0+MT(CρεW+ηq))+MCRKh4, where Lε is a one-variable global Lipschitz constant for Kε; the induced two-variable constant for Kε(x−y) is also Lε. The terms are initial signed particle approximation, blob regularization, force quadrature, and RK4 time error. The constants may depend on ε, particle count, and the tube; no uniform singular limit as ε→0 is claimed.

The RK4 tube condition in the Statement includes all numerical grid states and every stage generated at each grid step from both the exact solution start and the numerical start; both one-step maps are defined.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The sign-preserving smooth Euler characteristic flow and its density bound; consolidated signed initial particles with the stated masses and coupling cost; the common smooth quadrature force correction; and the compact tube with its RK4 derivative bounds.

[A1]

Assume AC for the signed Jordan parts and Countable Choice for the mollifier consistency estimate (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The mollified Biot-Savart force differs from the singular Euler force by at most Cρε∥ωt∥∞ (L1 consistency of the mollified Biot-Savart kernel).

[F2]

The tensor Simpson force residual is bounded by the displayed ηq (Tensor composite Simpson error for a two-dimensional force integral).

[F3]

For sign-matched flows with two bounded force defects, the bounded-Lipschitz difference is bounded by e2LεMt times the initial split cost plus the integrated defect (Signed Dobrushin stability with bounded force defects).

[F4]

RK4 on the controlled regularized particle tube has state error at most CRKh4 (Fourth-order global error for RK4 on a regularized vortex particle tube).

[F5]

The bounded-Lipschitz discrepancy is the dual supremum for signed measures; in particular dBL(0,0)=0, and the split cost of two zero measures is zero (Bounded-Lipschitz dual discrepancy for finite signed measures, Sign-preserving transport cost for finite signed measures).

[F6]

For a finite signed measure, ∣ν∣=ν++ν−. Under the stated consolidation and disjoint-sign-support assumptions, the explicit positive and negative atomic parts are mutually singular, so uniqueness of Jordan parts and this formula give ∑i∣Γi∣=∣ωN0∣(R2)=M (Jordan decomposition of a signed measure into unique mutually singular positive parts, For a signed measure, total variation is nu-plus plus nu-minus, finite partitions suffice, and nu-plus and nu-minus are extremal).

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F5F6givenalgebra

If M=0, then ω0=0 and [F6] gives ∑i∣Γi∣=0, hence every particle weight is zero. Thus both vorticity measures vanish at time T. By [F5], E0=0 and the displayed bound is zero; hence the conclusion holds. Suppose M>0. By [F1] and the bound ∥ωt∥∞≤W, the exact Euler flow, when written with interaction kernel Kε, has an additive force defect at most CρεW. The tensor evaluator contributes the second additive defect at most ηq by [F2].

1.2F4F5F6givenalgebra

By consolidation and disjointness of the positive and negative atomic supports, the finite measures ∑Γi>0Γiδxi0 and ∑Γi<0∣Γi∣δxi0 are mutually singular positive measures whose difference is ωN0. Uniqueness of Jordan parts and [F6] therefore give ∑i∣Γi∣=M. Couple each exact force-evaluated particle trajectory to its RK4 trajectory using the same signed particle label. The state error in [F4] is the Euclidean norm on the full particle state, so each particle-block displacement is no larger than CRKh4. For every bounded 1-Lipschitz test, the change in its signed integral is at most ∑i∣Γi∣CRKh4=MCRKh4.

2.1A1F3givenstep 1.1

Apply [F3] to the exact Euler characteristic flow and the common sign-preserving force-evaluated regularized flow, using initial split cost E0, total variation mass M, and summed defect CρεW+ηq. It gives dBL(ωT,ωNε,q(T))≤e2LεMT(E0+MT(CρεW+ηq)).

3.1step 2.1step 1.2algebra∎

For each admissible bounded-Lipschitz test, insert the exact force-evaluated particle measure between the Euler and RK4 measures. The scalar triangle inequality bounds the full difference by the right side of step 2.1 plus the displacement bound in step 1.2. Taking the supremum over tests proves the displayed error budget.

Remarks

This theorem is conditional on a smooth finite-time Euler solution, matched signed initial masses, a common sign-preserving quadrature force field, and the compact RK4 tube. It makes no claim for singular initial vorticity, arbitrary-sign particle sampling without a split coupling, or a rate uniform in ε.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources