Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Signed Dobrushin stability with bounded force defects

Statement

Assume AC and Countable Choice. Let Kε have one-variable Lipschitz constant Lε; then (x,y)↦Kε(x−y) has two-variable constant Lε. Let ω0,ν0 have separately matching positive and negative Jordan masses and total variation mass M. For M>0, use the Jordan-label probability spaces of Characteristic solution for a finite signed regularized vorticity and suppose their path maps Xtω(x,s) and Xtν(y,s) have integrable time suprema, satisfy X0ω(x,s)=x and X0ν(y,s)=y, and represent ωt,νt by the signed pushforward formula there. Assume at each time the positive and negative label pushforwards are the Jordan parts. Write utω(x)=∫Kε(x−z)dωt(z),utν(y)=∫Kε(y−z)dνt(z). Suppose their absolutely continuous sign-labelled trajectories satisfy X˙tω(x,s)=utω(Xtω(x,s))+rω(t,x,s),X˙tν(y,s)=utν(Xtν(y,s))+rν(t,y,s) for almost every time and almost every label of sign s∈{+,−}, with ∣rω∣≤ηω and ∣rν∣≤ην on [0,T]. For every prescribed initial pair of sign-preserving couplings of total cost D0, dBL(ωt,νt)≤C±(ωt,νt)≤e2LεMt(D0+M(ηω+ην)t). If M=0, both curves are zero and the inequalities hold with zero right side. Taking the infimum over initial couplings in the M>0 case gives the same bound with D0=C±(ω0,ν0), without assuming attainment.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Two signed-label path representations as specified in the Statement, equal positive-part and negative-part masses, common total variation mass M, and measurable label defects bounded by the stated constants.

[A2]

Assume Countable Choice for the mollified-kernel Lipschitz supplier (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The mollified Biot-Savart kernel is smooth and globally Lipschitz).

[F1]

For every sign-matched coupling, the bounded-Lipschitz dual discrepancy is at most its split transport cost (The bounded-Lipschitz dual discrepancy is bounded by split transport cost).

[F2]

The one-variable bound ∣Kε(a)−Kε(b)∣≤Lε∣a−b∣ and ∣(x−y)−(x′−y′)∣≤∣x−x′∣+∣y−y′∣ give the stated two-variable estimate (The mollified Biot-Savart kernel is smooth and globally Lipschitz, Cauchy-Schwarz ∣⟨x,y⟩∣≤∥x∥2∥y∥2 with its equality case, the triangle inequality for ∥⋅∥2, the parallelogram law and polarisation).

[F3]

The bounded-Lipschitz dual discrepancy uses bounded 1-Lipschitz tests (Bounded-Lipschitz dual discrepancy for finite signed measures); C± is the infimum over separate positive and negative Borel couplings (Sign-preserving transport cost for finite signed measures). The coordinatewise Borel path maps give Borel pair maps on the Euclidean product (The Borel product of R^m and R^n is the Borel sigma-algebra of R^{m+n}).

[F4]

Gronwall bounds a nonnegative continuous function satisfying the resulting integral inequality (Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients).

[F6]

Dominated convergence gives continuity of the transported cost from integrable path suprema (Dominated convergence).

[F7]

Matching Jordan masses and finite first moments give nonempty finite-cost sign-coupling sets, including the zero-mass case (The bounded-Lipschitz dual discrepancy is bounded by split transport cost).

Proof

1.1A1givenF3F6construct

If M=0, the zero-mass condition and equality of total variation masses make ωt=νt=0, so all conclusions hold. Suppose M>0. Fix the prescribed couplings π0+,π0−. Transport each by the corresponding two characteristic flows to obtain couplings πt+,πt−. Let D(t)=∑s∈{+,−}∫∣Xtω(x,s)−Xtν(y,s)∣dπ0s(x,y). The initial-position identities give D(0)=D0. Their marginals are the Jordan parts at time t by the sign-preservation assumption, so [F3] gives C±(ωt,νt)≤D(t). Integrable path suprema and [F6] make D continuous.

2.1A1A2F2F4F5F6step 1.1algebra

For a coupled pair, subtract the two label equations. Decompose each signed interaction into its positive and negative Jordan-label integrals and apply [F2]. The interaction difference is at most LεM∣Xω−Xν∣+LεD(t): the first term uses total variation mass M, and the inner second-coordinate differences integrate to the two transported coupling costs whose sum is D(t). The defects add at most ηω+ην. Integrating this pointwise estimate against the outer couplings, whose total mass is M, yields D(t)≤D0+2LεM∫0tD(s)ds+M(ηω+ην)t. The last term and D0 are nondecreasing, so [F4] gives the displayed exponential bound.

3.1F1F3F7step 1.1step 2.1∎

Apply [F1] and step 1.1 to obtain the bounded-Lipschitz estimate. By [F7], the initial coupling sets are nonempty and their infimum is finite; taking the infimum of the step 2.1 bound gives the stated result with D0=C±(ω0,ν0). No infimum is assumed to be attained.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

81 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources