Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rademacher differentiability in Euclidean space

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For every open U⊆Rn and locally Lipschitz map u:U→Rm (each point has a neighborhood on which ∣u(y)−u(z)∣≤L∣y−z∣ for some finite L, Lipschitz map, α-Hölder map for rational 0<α≤1, and contraction), u is Frechet differentiable outside a null subset of U. Here Frechet differentiability at x means that a linear map A:Rn→Rm satisfies u(x+h)=u(x)+Ah+o(∣h∣).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, an open set U⊆Rn, and a locally Lipschitz map u:U→Rm.

[A1]

Every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice); the implication AC ⇒ DC ⇒ Countable Choice is supplied by AC implies DC implies countable choice.

[F1]

An ACL representative whose coordinate derivatives are locally Lp has those derivatives as its weak derivatives (ACL representatives recover their weak gradients by Fubini).

[F3]

An absolutely continuous function has a derivative almost everywhere and is the integral of that derivative (Fundamental theorem of calculus for absolutely continuous functions).

[F4]

Ball averages of a locally integrable function converge to its value almost everywhere (Lebesgue differentiation theorem on Rn).

[F5]

For w∈W1,1(B) on a ball of radius r, ∥w−wB∥L1(B)≤C(n)r∥Dw∥L1(B) (Poincare inequality on a ball).

[F6]

Countable unions and subsets of null subsets of Rn are null under Countable Choice (Subsets and countable unions of null subsets of Rm are null).

[F7]

Nullity is the closed-cube-cover condition in Rn (Measure zero and content zero in Rm by countable and finite cube covers).

[F9]

A weak derivative is defined by the signed test-function identity, and W1,1(B) consists of L1 functions whose first weak derivatives lie in L1 (Weak derivative of a locally integrable function, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).

[F10]

Rational vectors are countable and dense in Rn by coordinatewise rational approximation; rational open balls form a countable basis (Q is countably infinite, A product of two at most countable sets is at most countable, The rationals embed densely in the reals).

[F11]

Under Countable Choice, Lebesgue measure on Rn is complete and is the restriction of Lebesgue outer measure to the measurable sets (Assuming countable choice, L(Rn) is a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set and λn is a complete measure extending elementary volume). Thus every measurable set of measure zero has outer measure zero, hence is null in the closed-cube-cover sense by A subset of Rm has Lebesgue outer measure zero if and only if it is null in the sense of countable closed-cube covers; every subset is null by [F6].

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F3F10F11givenconstruct

Fix a scalar component and a ball compactly contained in a neighborhood where it is L-Lipschitz. Each coordinate section is Lipschitz, hence absolutely continuous by [F2], and has a derivative almost everywhere by [F3], bounded by L. For measurability, write the limsup and liminf of the coordinate difference quotients as countable suprema and infima over rational increments; continuity of the section makes these equal the corresponding real-increment limits. Define gi by their common finite limit where it exists and by zero elsewhere. Fubini makes the measurable exceptional set have Lebesgue measure zero; [F11] converts it to closed-cube-cover nullity. The continuous function is an ACL representative, so [F1] gives Diu=gi weakly and u∈Wloc1,∞.

2.1A1F4F6F10F11step 1.1construct

Outside a null set, x is a strong Lebesgue point of g=(g1,…,gn). For each rational vector q∈Qn, apply [F4] locally to the scalar functions ∣g−q∣ and to the components of g. On a fixed bounded Lipschitz ball these functions are integrable; extend them by zero to Rn to apply [F4], and restrict to interior points, where sufficiently small ball averages are unchanged. For each application, the almost-everywhere conclusion provides a measurable Lebesgue-measure-zero set containing the exceptions. Convert that set to closed-cube-cover nullity by [F11], then remove the countable union of these cube-cover-null sets using [F6]. At each remaining point, for every rational q, lim sup⁡r↓01λ(B(x,r))∫B(x,r)∣g(y)−g(x)∣ dy≤2∣q−g(x)∣. Rational vectors approximate g(x) by [F10], so this limit is zero. The rational balls whose closures lie in neighborhoods on which the chosen component is Lipschitz form a countable cover of U: local Lipschitz continuity gives a suitable ball around each point, density of rational centers/radii gives a rational subball, and [A1] selects one Lipschitz neighborhood and constant for each such ball. Apply the local argument on these balls.

3.1F1F5F8F9step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Fix such a point x, put p=g(x), and on B(x,r)⋐U set w(y)=u(y)−u(x)−p⋅(y−x). The function w is bounded on this ball. By [F1] and linearity of the test-function identity, its weak gradient is g(y)−p, which is bounded there; thus w∈W1,1(B(x,r)) by [F9]. Also w(x)=0 and w is (L+∣p∣)-Lipschitz. The strong Lebesgue-point property and [F8] give ∫B(x,r)∣Dw∣=o(rn). Applying [F5] yields ∫B(x,r)∣w−wB(x,r)∣=o(rn+1).

4.1F8step 3.1algebra

Write M=L+∣p∣. If M=0, w vanishes on every sufficiently small ball. Otherwise fix ϵ>0. If ∣wB(x,r)∣≥ϵr, then on B(x,cr), with c=min⁡{1/2,ϵ/(2M)}, the Lipschitz bound and w(x)=0 give ∣w−wB(x,r)∣≥ϵr/2. Since λ(B(x,cr))=vncnrn by [F8], the integral in step 3.1 would be at least vncnϵrn+1/2, a contradiction for all sufficiently small r. Hence wB(x,r)=o(r). If some y∈B(x,r/2) had ∣w(y)∣≥ϵr, then for small r we would have ∣w(y)−wB(x,r)∣≥ϵr/2. On B(y,c′r)⊂B(x,r), where c′=min⁡{1/4,ϵ/(4M)}, Lipschitz continuity gives ∣w−wB(x,r)∣≥ϵr/4. Its integral is at least vn(c′)nϵrn+1/4, again contradicting step 3.1. Thus sup⁡B(x,r/2)∣w∣=o(r). For h≠0, take r=3∣h∣, so x+h∈B(x,r/2); this yields the Frechet expansion u(x+h)−u(x)−p⋅h=o(∣h∣).

5.1A1F6F7F10step 4.1∎

The countable rational-ball basis [F10] and the finitely many real components of u produce one exceptional cube-cover-null set by [F6] and the definition [F7]. The component derivatives assemble into the Frechet derivative. The full Axiom of Choice is used through the stated ACL, Fubini, differentiation, null-union and Poincare suppliers; no reduction to Countable Choice is asserted.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

132 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources