Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Evaluation boundary isomorphism for the disk

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let D2⊆R2 be the closed unit disc with the base configuration Qn=(q1,…,qn) of Boundary-fixed mapping class group of a punctured disk, let

E:=Homeo⁡+(D2,∂D2),B:=Cn(int⁡D2),F:=Homeo⁡+(D2,∂D2;Qn),

and let δ:π1(B,[Qn])→Mod⁡(D2,Qn;∂D2)=π0(F) be the inverse-endpoint boundary map of Boundary map from point motions. Then δ is an isomorphism of groups for every n≥0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, the evaluation map ev⁡:E→B of Evaluation is a numerable bundle and Hurewicz fibration, the fibre F=ev⁡−1([Qn]) over the basepoint, and the boundary map δ of Boundary map from point motions.

[L1]

ev⁡ is a Hurewicz fibration with fibre F over [Qn] (Evaluation is a numerable bundle and Hurewicz fibration).

[L2]

The boundary map δ is a well-defined group homomorphism from π1(B,[Qn]) to Mod⁡(D2,Qn;∂D2)=π0(F), and it is the connecting map of the fibration exact sequence in the library's convention (Point-motion boundary map is a homomorphism, Boundary map from point motions).

[L3]

E=Homeo⁡+(D2,∂D2) is contractible in the compact-open topology (Alexander contraction of the boundary-fixed disk homeomorphism group).

[L4]

A contractible space is path-connected (Every nonempty contractible space is path-connected) and has trivial fundamental group at every basepoint (A contractible space has trivial fundamental group).

[L5]

For the based fibration ev⁡:E→B with fibre F, the sequence ⋯→π1(E)→ev⁡∗π1(B)→δπ0(F)→i∗π0(E)→π0(B) is exact wherever there is an incoming and outgoing arrow, with π0 a pointed set and π1 groups; exactness means incoming image equals the inverse image of the distinguished element (Long exact sequence of homotopy groups of a fibration).

[L6]

π0(F)=Mod⁡(D2,Qn;∂D2) is a group and π1(B,[Qn]) is a group, both with multiplication on classes (Boundary-fixed mapping class group of a punctured disk).

[L7]

A group isomorphism is a bijective group homomorphism (Group isomorphisms, automorphisms and the set Aut⁡(G)).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L3L4

The two low-degree terms of the total space are trivial. By [L3] the space E is contractible, so by [L4] it is path-connected, that is π0(E) is a one-point set and the induced map π0(F)→π0(E) is constant; and π1(E,id⁡)={1} is the trivial group. Both statements hold for every n≥0 because neither depends on the number of marked points.

1.2L2L6

The boundary map is a group homomorphism. By [L2], δ is a well-defined map π1(B,[Qn])→π0(F) preserving the products of [L6]; that is, δ is a group homomorphism and the two displayed groups are the ones from the fibration exact sequence.

2.1L1L2L5step 1.1

Injectivity. The map ev⁡ is a Hurewicz fibration with fibre F over the basepoint by [L1], so the exact sequence [L5] applies to it; exactness at π1(B) says that the kernel of δ equals the image of ev⁡∗:π1(E,id⁡)→π1(B,[Qn]). By step 1.1 the group π1(E,id⁡) is trivial, so its image is the trivial subgroup, and the kernel of δ is trivial: distinct classes in π1(B,[Qn]) have distinct images in π0(F).

2.2L1L5step 1.1

Surjectivity. The exact sequence [L5] applies to ev⁡ by the fibration statement [L1]; exactness at π0(F) says that the image of δ equals the kernel of i∗:π0(F)→π0(E), the kernel of a map of pointed sets being the preimage of the distinguished component. By step 1.1 the set π0(E) is a single point, so every element of π0(F) is sent to the unique component of E and the kernel of i∗ is all of π0(F). Hence every element of π0(F)=Mod⁡(D2,Qn;∂D2) is the image under δ of some class in π1(B,[Qn]).

3.1L2L5L7step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 2.2∎

The isomorphism and the elementary cases. By steps 1.2 and 2.1 the homomorphism δ is injective, and by step 2.2 it is surjective; a bijective group homomorphism is an isomorphism by [L7], which proves the claim for every n≥0. The case n=0 is included in this argument: B=C0(int⁡D2) is a one-point space, F=E, the evaluation fibration is the constant projection E→{[Q0]} of the contractible space E, and both π1(B,[Q0]) and π0(F) are trivial, as the steps above give; for n=1 only the collision condition disappears from B and the argument is unchanged.

Remarks

  • Both sides of δ are computed at the same basepoint [Qn], and no connecting path between basepoints is chosen; this is why the result needs only the stated Axiom of Choice, which enters through the numerable-bundle route to fibration lifting, not through a basepoint change.
  • The value of δ is the inverse of the lifted endpoint; with this convention δ is the connecting map ∂p[γ]=[e0]⋅[γ]−1 of the published exact sequence, and the isomorphism of the theorem is the identification of the two.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

35 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources