Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The truncated normal selective pivot is conditionally uniform

Statement

Assume AC and the setup of Polyhedral selective normal pivot, with Pμ(S)>0. For Pμ(Z∈⋅∣S)-almost every z, the conditional law of T given Z=z and S is the N(θ,s2) law restricted to [L(z),U(z)] and normalized by Δθ(z)>0. Its CDF on that interval is qθ(t,z). The pivot is Borel measurable on the selected data space. Consequently qθ(Y) is Uniform(0,1) conditionally on (Z,S) wherever the normalizer is positive, and is also Uniform(0,1) conditionally on S alone. The event S is a single fixed polyhedron; no union-of-polyhedra claim is made.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, known σ>0, nonzero fixed η, fixed A,b, Y∼Nn(μ,σ2In), and Pμ(S)>0.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the Gaussian suppliers. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

The polyhedron is exactly the feasible contrast interval with the zero-coefficient feasibility condition, and the interval fibers are Borel. A polyhedral event restricts the contrast to a computable interval

[F2]

T and Z are independent, and T∼N(θ,s2). A Gaussian contrast is independent of its orthogonal residual

[F3]

Independent random elements have their product joint law. Independent random elements have product joint law

[F4]

For a joint density relative to a product of sigma-finite measures and a supplied probability filler, the section integral is the marginal density; wherever that integral is finite and positive, the normalized section is a regular conditional distribution, and such sections have full marginal probability. Conditional density formula

[F5]

The standard normal CDF is continuous and strictly increasing with limits zero and one at the extended endpoints. The standard normal CDF is continuous and strictly increasing

[F6]

A scalar law N(θ,s2) for s>0 is the image of the standard normal by x↦θ+sx, so its CDF is Φ((t−θ)/s). Standard normal and normal laws

[F7]

The functions T,Z,L,U,G,Δθ and the pivot formula are those defined in the two local definition items. Polyhedral selection event and contrast interval Polyhedral selective normal pivot

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F3F7given

Under Pμ, T and Z are independent by [F2], so their joint law is the product of their marginal laws by [F3]. Write νT=N(θ,s2) and let νZ be the marginal law of Z. Both are probability measures and hence sigma-finite. By [F1] and [F7], the selection event in these coordinates is the Borel set D={(t,z):G(z), L(z)≤t≤U(z)}. For every product-measurable set B, conditioning the product law on D gives Qμ((T,Z)∈B)=∫B1D(t,z)/Pμ(S) d(νT×νZ)(t,z). Thus the selected joint law has this product density.

2.1A1F1F2F4F5F6F7step 1.1

Put H(z)=G(z)∧(L(z)≤U(z)). If H(z) fails, the fiber is empty and its section integral is zero. If H(z) holds, the section is [L(z),U(z)]; by [F5], [F6], and the endpoint convention in [F7], its νT-probability is Δθ(z), including a singleton interval and infinite endpoints. Thus the section integral of the selected density is m(z)=1H(z)Δθ(z)/Pμ(S). It is finite because 0≤Δθ(z)≤1 on feasible fibers and Pμ(S)>0. Apply [F4] with filler probability νT: for almost every selected z, m(z)>0, so H(z) holds, L(z)<U(z), and Δθ(z)>0; the conditional law of T is Kz(B)=νT(B∩[L(z),U(z)])/Δθ(z). Fibers with zero section integral have zero selected marginal probability, so their arbitrary extension value in the pivot definition is immaterial.

3.1A1F5F6F7step 2.1algebra

For L(z)≤t≤U(z), [F6] gives Kz((−∞,t])=[Φ((t−θ)/s)−Φ((L(z)−θ)/s)]/[Φ((U(z)−θ)/s)−Φ((L(z)−θ)/s)]=qθ(t,z). The denominator is positive exactly on the selected fibers under consideration. The finite max/min formulas make L,U,G Borel, and [F5] with [F7] makes Δθ Borel. On the Borel set of y∈S for which G(Z(y)), L(Z(y))<U(Z(y)), and Δθ(Z(y))>0, the pivot's numerator and reciprocal denominator are Borel, so the ratio is Borel; the definition extends it by zero on the complement.

4.1A1F4F5step 2.1step 3.1construct

Fix such a z. The conditional density in step 2.1 is positive throughout the interval and has no atoms; [F5] makes its CDF continuous and strictly increasing from zero to one, including when an endpoint is infinite. For any u∈(0,1) there is a unique tu in the interval with qθ(tu,z)=u, so Kz{t:qθ(t,z)≤u}=Kz((−∞,tu])=qθ(tu,z)=u. At u=0 the probability is zero and at u=1 it is one because the conditional law has a density. Thus the pivot is uniform given Z=z,S.

5.1F4step 4.1∎

Integrating the conditional identity in step 4.1 against the selected marginal law of Z supplied by [F4] gives Pμ(qθ(Y)≤u∣S)=u for every u∈[0,1]. Hence the pivot is uniform given S as well.

Remarks

The probability guarantee is conditional on the fixed selection event under the stated Gaussian sampling law. It does not establish that the Gaussian model is adequate for data, robustness to model misspecification, or simultaneous validity for several contrasts chosen after observing the data.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources