Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 2 results · all verified · 2 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 2 also cleared it.

Average Orders Divisor Sums and Representation Counts — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples keep the two main computations concrete. The first draws one small hyperbola split exactly, and the second shows what the divisor-summatory error looks like numerically before any asymptotic language hides the table.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-31Open item page →

A small lattice decomposition for Dirichlet's hyperbola method

Example

Take x=12, U=3, and V=4, so UV=12. For τ=1∗1, Dirichlet's hyperbola identity becomes

∑n≤12τ(n)=∑a≤3⌊12a⌋+∑b≤4⌊12b⌋−3⋅4.

Numerically this is

35=(12+6+4)+(12+6+4+3)−12.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The value x=12 and the split U=3, V=4.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1given

By The divisor functions arise by Dirichlet convolution, τ=1∗1. Therefore Dirichlet's hyperbola method for summatory convolutions applies with F(y)=G(y)=⌊y⌋.

2.1step 1.1givenalgebra

The two arm sums are ∑a≤3⌊12a⌋=12+6+4=22,∑b≤4⌊12b⌋=12+6+4+3=25, and the overlap is F(3)G(4)=3⋅4=12.

3.1step 2.1givenalgebra∎

Hence the hyperbola identity gives ∑n≤12τ(n)=22+25−12=35. This matches the direct total 1+2+2+3+2+4+2+4+3+4+2+6=35.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-31Open item page →

The divisor summatory estimate through several small values

Example

Let

E(x):=∑n≤xτ(n)−xlog⁡x−(2γ−1)x.

Using γ≈0.5772156649, the theorem predicts E(x)=O(x). For four small values one gets:

x∑n≤xτ(n)xlog⁡x+(2γ−1)xE(x)E(x)/x
5108.8193461.1806540.528004
102724.5701642.4298360.768382
206663.0032722.9967280.670089
50207203.3227173.6772830.520046

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The definition of E(x) above.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

The exact divisor sums are obtained by direct counting: ∑n≤5τ(n)=10, ∑n≤10τ(n)=27, ∑n≤20τ(n)=66, and ∑n≤50τ(n)=207.

2.1step 1.1givenalgebra

Substituting these four values into the displayed definition of E(x) produces the residual column and then the scaled residual column E(x)/x.

3.1step 2.1given∎

The quotients in the last column stay on the scale of a bounded constant rather than growing like a positive power of x, which is exactly the x scale asserted by The summatory divisor-counting function is x log x plus (2 gamma - 1)x plus O(sqrt x).

Sources