Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Lorentzian spin-lift interface

Definition

Assume ACω. Let (M,g,N,o) be an oriented and time-oriented smooth Lorentzian four-manifold, and let Pg+(M) be its smooth oriented time-oriented orthonormal frame bundle from the oriented-frame-bundle proposition. Set Spin+(1,3):=SL(2,C) and let ρ:SL(2,C)→SO+(1,3) be the Hermitian-matrix covering homomorphism of the Hermitian-matrix double-cover proposition. A Lorentzian spin structure is a smooth right principal SL(2,C)-bundle P~→M together with a smooth map λ:P~→Pg+(M) over the identity of M such that

λ(ua)=λ(u)ρ(a)(u∈P~, a∈SL(2,C)),

and the restriction of λ to each fiber is a surjective two-sheeted covering map. The map is over the identity, meaning π+∘λ=π~; the square below displays this base condition and is not used as a proof.

ePP+g(M)MM¸e¼¼+idM

A smooth finite-dimensional complex representation here consists of a finite-dimensional complex vector space Vσ and a smooth group homomorphism σ:SL(2,C)→GL(Vσ), where GL(Vσ) is the group of invertible complex-linear maps on Vσ, with the smooth structure inherited as an open subset of the real vector space of complex-linear endomorphisms of Vσ. Its associated vector bundle is the quotient P~×σVσ:=(P~×Vσ)/∼, where ∼ is the equivalence relation generated by (ua,v)∼(u,σ(a)v) for u∈P~, a∈SL(2,C) and v∈Vσ; equivalently (u,v)∼(ua,σ(a)−1v), using the right-principal associated-bundle convention. Write [u,v] for the class of (u,v). Since every σ(a) is complex-linear, the fiberwise vector-space operations [u,v]+[u,w]=[u,v+w] and z[u,v]=[u,zv] for z∈C are independent of the representative. The associated-bundle local-triviality proposition gives local triviality; on an overlap with local sections satisfying sj(x)=si(x)aij(x), the smooth principal charts give transition maps (x,v)↦(x,σ(aij(x))v). These are smooth because σ is smooth and define the smooth vector-bundle structure. The defining spinor representation here is Vσ=C2 with the action σ(a)v=av for a∈SL(2,C) and column vectors v∈C2. It is a smooth group homomorphism because matrix multiplication is smooth and (ab)v=a(bv). Its associated bundle is called the rank-two complex spinor bundle in this convention; a spinor field is a smooth section of that bundle.

To define a lift of a Lorentz connection, first supply a principal connection H+⊂TPg+(M) on the frame bundle: it is a smooth vector subbundle complementary to VP+:=ker⁡(dπ+) and invariant under the right SO+(1,3) action, as in the principal-connection definition. This H+ is additional global data; the local affine connection and local matrix ω in the local tetrad-connection definition do not determine it unless they are specified as restrictions of a chosen global metric-compatible affine connection whose induced principal connection is the supplied H+. A lift is a supplied principal connection H~⊂TP~, likewise a smooth right-invariant horizontal complement to VP~:=ker⁡(dπ~), such that dλu(H~u)=Hλ(u)+ at each u∈P~. It induces a covariant derivative on the associated vector bundle by horizontal differentiation: a section is represented by a smooth equivariant map f:P~→Vσ with f(ua)=σ(a)−1f(u), and its derivative along a smooth base vector field X at x is ∇Xs(x):=[u,dfu(X~uH)] for u∈P~x. Here s(x)=[u,f(u)], and the horizontal lift is the smooth field X~uH:=(dπ~u∣H~u)−1Xx; the restriction is a linear isomorphism because H~ complements the vertical kernel. Right invariance and uniqueness give X~uaH=dRa(X~uH). Differentiating f∘Ra=σ(a)−1f therefore gives dfua(X~uaH)=σ(a)−1dfu(X~uH), and the associated-bundle relation makes [u,dfu(X~uH)] independent of u. In principal charts this formula is smooth, is real C∞(M)-linear in X and complex-linear in s. For h∈C∞(M,C), the product rule applied to (h∘π~)f gives ∇X(hs)=X(h)s+h∇Xs. These are the covariant-derivative properties used here. The local Clifford-compatibility calculation is a separate proposition about supplied gamma matrices and does not follow from the existence of σ alone. A spin structure, a global spinor field, and a lifted connection are extra data: this definition asserts neither existence nor uniqueness of a spin lift, global tetrad, or connection lift. The matrix group and covering homomorphism are the Lorentzian ones specified above.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources