Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A stationary path that is not a local minimum: the quadratic model L=12(v2−4q2) on [0,π]

Example

Let n=1, [a,b]=[0,π], U=R, and L(q,v)=12(v2−4q2), a C∞ (hence C2) Lagrangian on R×R×R (A time-dependent Lagrangian chart, its action functional and its fixed-endpoint first variations, Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms). Let

q∗(t):=sin⁡2t,η(t):=sin⁡t.

Use fixed-endpoint admissible C2 curves with q(0)=q(π)=0 and the norm ∥q∥C2:=max⁡0≤j≤2sup⁡t∈[0,π]∣q(j)(t)∣. A local minimum means S(q∗)≤S(q) for all admissible q in some ball about q∗ in this norm. Then q∗ is a stationary curve of the action S(q)=∫0π12(q′2−4q2)dt, and for the one-parameter family q∗+ϵη one has the exact identity

S(q∗+ϵη)=S(q∗)−3π4ϵ2(ϵ∈R).

In particular S(q∗+ϵη)<S(q∗) for every ϵ≠0: the stationary curve is not a local minimum of the action. The model has no minimiser at all, since S(λη)=−3π4λ2→−∞ as ∣λ∣→∞.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Lagrangian L(q,v)=12(v2−4q2) on [0,π], the curves q∗(t)=sin⁡2t and η(t)=sin⁡t, and the action S of A time-dependent Lagrangian chart, its action functional and its fixed-endpoint first variations.

[F1]

The functions sin⁡ and cos⁡ are differentiable on R with sin⁡′=cos⁡, cos⁡′=−sin⁡, sin⁡0=0, cos⁡0=1 (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, Sine and cosine defined by their real power series); the chain rule gives q∗′(t)=2cos⁡2t and q∗′′(t)=−4sin⁡2t (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a)). The addition formulas cos⁡(2t)=cos⁡2t−sin⁡2t, sin⁡(2t)=2sin⁡tcos⁡t and the Pythagorean identity cos⁡2t+sin⁡2t=1 hold for all real t (The addition formulas for sine and cosine, Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine), and sin⁡(2π)=0 because 2π is a period of sin⁡ (The zero sets of sine and cosine and the least positive common period 2 pi).

[F2]

The Euler–Lagrange expression of L along a C2 curve q is EL(q)=−q′′−4q, because Lq=−4q and Lv=q′; stationarity of a C2 curve for S is equivalent to EL(q)=0 (A time-dependent Lagrangian chart, its action functional and its fixed-endpoint first variations, Stationarity of the time-dependent action is equivalent to the vanishing of the Euler-Lagrange expression, The first variation of a time-dependent action on a finite interval: admissibility, the integral formula and continuity of the Euler-Lagrange coefficient).

Verification

technique · direct; check the Euler–Lagrange equation and expand the quadratic action exactly
1.1F1F2given

The curve q∗ is C2 on an open interval containing [0,π] with q∗(0)=q∗(π)=0, and EL(q∗)=−q∗′′−4q∗=4sin⁡2t−4sin⁡2t=0; hence q∗ is stationary for S by [F2].

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra

For every ϵ the curve q∗+ϵη is C2 with zero endpoint values, and the integrand of its action is a quadratic polynomial in ϵ: 12((q∗′+ϵη′)2−4(q∗+ϵη)2)=12(q∗′2−4q∗2)+ϵ(q∗′η′−4q∗η)+ϵ22(η′2−4η2). By [F3] the action is the sum of the integrals of the three summands, and the linear term is ϵ δS(q∗)[η]=0 by step 1.1 and [F2].

3.1F1F3step 2.1algebra

The quadratic term: with η=sin⁡, η′=cos⁡ and η′2−4η2=cos⁡2t−4sin⁡2t. By [F1], cos⁡2t=12(1+cos⁡2t) and sin⁡2t=12(1−cos⁡2t), so cos⁡2t−4sin⁡2t=12(1+cos⁡2t)−2(1−cos⁡2t)=−32+52cos⁡2t. Integrating over [0,π] and using ∫0πcos⁡2t dt=0 from [F3] and ∫0π1 dt=π gives ∫0π(η′2−4η2)dt=−3π2. Substituting into step 2.1 gives S(q∗+ϵη)=S(q∗)−3π4ϵ2 for every real ϵ.

4.1F1F2F3step 2.1step 3.1algebra

A positive direction is ζ(t):=sin⁡3t, which vanishes at both endpoints. The same expansion as step 2.1 has zero linear term by stationarity and gives S(q∗+ϵζ)−S(q∗)=12ϵ2∫0π(9cos⁡23t−4sin⁡23t)dt=5π4ϵ2. Use the double-angle formulas and ∫0πcos⁡6t dt=[sin⁡6t/6]0π=0, by periodicity from [F1]. Thus arbitrarily small nonzero variations in this direction increase the action, whereas step 3.1 decreases it in direction η.

5.1step 3.1algebra∎

Since ∥ϵη∥C2=∣ϵ∣∥η∥C2→0 and −3π4ϵ2<0 for every ϵ≠0, arbitrarily small nonzero variations of the stationary curve strictly decrease the action; thus q∗ is not a local minimum. Moreover S(λη)=−3π4λ2 tends to −∞, so the model has no minimising curve at all.

Remarks

  • The example is a mathematical model with an indefinite quadratic Lagrangian; it shows that the Euler–Lagrange equation is a necessary condition only, and that "principle of least action" is a misnomer in general. The stationary curve here is a saddle in the infinite-dimensional sense realised by the decreasing family q∗+ϵsin⁡t and the increasing family q∗+ϵsin⁡3t of steps 3.1 and 4.1.

  • The zero curve q=0 is also stationary for this model, and it is likewise not a local minimum, by the same computation with q∗ replaced by 0. Nothing here depends on the interpretation of L as a physical energy; no positivity of the kinetic term is claimed.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources