How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A stationary path that is not a local minimum: the quadratic model on
Example
Let , , , and , a (hence ) Lagrangian on (A time-dependent Lagrangian chart, its action functional and its fixed-endpoint first variations, Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms). Let
Use fixed-endpoint admissible curves with and the norm . A local minimum means for all admissible in some ball about in this norm. Then is a stationary curve of the action , and for the one-parameter family one has the exact identity
In particular for every : the stationary curve is not a local minimum of the action. The model has no minimiser at all, since as .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Lagrangian on , the curves and , and the action of A time-dependent Lagrangian chart, its action functional and its fixed-endpoint first variations.
The functions and are differentiable on with , , , (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, Sine and cosine defined by their real power series); the chain rule gives and (The chain rule for total derivatives: ). The addition formulas , and the Pythagorean identity hold for all real (The addition formulas for sine and cosine, Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine), and because is a period of (The zero sets of sine and cosine and the least positive common period 2 pi).
The Euler–Lagrange expression of along a curve is , because and ; stationarity of a curve for is equivalent to (A time-dependent Lagrangian chart, its action functional and its fixed-endpoint first variations, Stationarity of the time-dependent action is equivalent to the vanishing of the Euler-Lagrange expression, The first variation of a time-dependent action on a finite interval: admissibility, the integral formula and continuity of the Euler-Lagrange coefficient).
For a family the first variation is the derivative at of ; the integral is linear and integrable functions are the continuous ones here (Integrable functions on form a set closed under sums and scalar multiples, and , The lower and upper Darboux integrals of a bounded on as and , Darboux integrability as their equality, and the notation , A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion, Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length). The second fundamental theorem evaluates (The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then , The chain rule for total derivatives: ).
Verification
The curve is on an open interval containing with , and ; hence is stationary for by [F2].
For every the curve is with zero endpoint values, and the integrand of its action is a quadratic polynomial in : By [F3] the action is the sum of the integrals of the three summands, and the linear term is by step 1.1 and [F2].
The quadratic term: with , and . By [F1], and , so . Integrating over and using from [F3] and gives . Substituting into step 2.1 gives for every real .
A positive direction is , which vanishes at both endpoints. The same expansion as step 2.1 has zero linear term by stationarity and gives . Use the double-angle formulas and , by periodicity from [F1]. Thus arbitrarily small nonzero variations in this direction increase the action, whereas step 3.1 decreases it in direction .
Since and for every , arbitrarily small nonzero variations of the stationary curve strictly decrease the action; thus is not a local minimum. Moreover tends to , so the model has no minimising curve at all.
Remarks
-
The example is a mathematical model with an indefinite quadratic Lagrangian; it shows that the Euler–Lagrange equation is a necessary condition only, and that "principle of least action" is a misnomer in general. The stationary curve here is a saddle in the infinite-dimensional sense realised by the decreasing family and the increasing family of steps 3.1 and 4.1.
-
The zero curve is also stationary for this model, and it is likewise not a local minimum, by the same computation with replaced by . Nothing here depends on the interpretation of as a physical energy; no positivity of the kinetic term is claimed.
Depends on
A time-dependent Lagrangian chart, its action functional and its fixed-endpoint first variations
The first variation of a time-dependent action on a finite interval: admissibility, the integral formula and continuity of the Euler-Lagrange coefficient
Stationarity of the time-dependent action is equivalent to the vanishing of the Euler-Lagrange expression
The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine
Sine and cosine defined by their real power series
The addition formulas for sine and cosine
Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine
The zero sets of sine and cosine and the least positive common period 2 pi
The chain rule for total derivatives:
The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then
Integrable functions on form a set closed under sums and scalar multiples, and
The lower and upper Darboux integrals of a bounded on as and , Darboux integrability as their equality, and the notation
A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion
Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms
Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- D. Cline, Variational Principles in Classical Mechanics (2nd edition, University of Rochester River Campus Libraries, open textbook, CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), Section 5.1 (Introduction to the Calculus of Variations: stationary values of a functional need not be extrema)
- D. Tong, Classical Dynamics (University of Cambridge Part II Mathematical Tripos), Section 2.1 (the remark that the true path may be a minimum or a saddle), printed pages 10-13