How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Quantified dilute exact coupled family
Example
Assume . Let have length units and let be dimensionless with . Put and choose either charge sign in the exact coupled family. For , define the Euclidean radius and , so . Then where . These are exact ideal-family bounds, not measured errors. On , the static dust velocity field is . For each fixed and , define its static worldline by This is a smooth future-directed timelike curve with and ; , measured in seconds, is its proper-time parameter in the adopted length-coordinate convention. Here a static worldline is freely falling exactly when it is a geodesic, , with the connection of the exact family. Define the model's electromagnetic force per unit mass by ; this is defined everywhere for this profile since . For this profile, , so when both and are nonzero and . At both vectors vanish, and the central static worldline is geodesic.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , , , , and the exact family and dilute comparison of the corollary.
Globally regular sphere, proper integrals and dilute bounds supplies , the exact metric and density profile, and the bounds , , and .
Exact smooth superharmonic counterpoised dust family supplies , , and the identity .
The product and quotient differentiation rules hold for differentiable real functions where the denominator is nonzero (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
Continuous real functions on a compact interval are Riemann integrable (A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion). If a function is continuous on , differentiable inside, and its derivative has an integrable extension, Newton--Leibniz gives its endpoint difference (Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on , differentiability on , and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative). Pointwise order and nonnegativity are preserved by integrals on (If on and both are integrable then ; and ).
, so , , and .
Verification
Put . Since and both square roots are positive, and . By the metric formula in [F1], , so the time-component discrepancy is .
Define for . Twice applying the quotient/product rules [F3] gives and , between and . For fixed , set on . It is continuous with continuous derivative , which is integrable by [F4]. Newton--Leibniz [F4] gives The integrand lies between and , both continuous comparison functions. Integral monotonicity [F4], and Newton--Leibniz for the polynomial primitive , give . Thus the discrepancy in step 1.1 is at most ; [A1] further gives . At the same sharper comparison is zero by direct evaluation, without applying the nondegenerate-interval theorem.
The spatial bound in [F1] gives , since is or . The density identity in [F1] gives . Applying [A1] and combining with step 2.1 yields the three numerical bounds in the Example.
For the worldline defined in the Statement, , so its covariant acceleration is the supplier field . Here by [F1] and ; hence is nonzero when , while at . The supplier also gives . Dividing its all-component identity by positive gives everywhere. Thus both vectors are nonzero for and vanish at the center; only the noncentral static worldlines fail the geodesic definition of free fall.
Remarks
The numerical fractions are consequences of the ideal choice and are not experimental uncertainties. No measurement, statistical estimate, or general perturbation theorem is asserted.
Depends on
If on and both are integrable then ; and
Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on , differentiability on , and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative
A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion
Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Globally regular sphere, proper integrals and dilute bounds
Exact smooth superharmonic counterpoised dust family
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- Sean M. Carroll, Lecture Notes on General Relativity, arXiv:gr-qc/9712019v1 (1997), Ch. 3, equations (3.90), (3.92), (3.95)
- David Tong, General Relativity, full author-hosted lecture notes, Michaelmas 2019, §3.4.1
- Reinhard Meinel and Moritz Hütten, On the black hole limit of electrically counterpoised dust configurations, arXiv:1105.3807v3 (2011), §2