Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Globally regular sphere, proper integrals and dilute bounds

Statement

Assume ACω as stated in The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω). Let a,b>0 have length units, let s∈{−1,+1}, and on all of R3 set r2=(x1)2+(x2)2+(x3)2,Ψ(x):=r2+b2>0,H(x):=1+aΨ(x). Use the constants and exact formal coupled family of Exact smooth superharmonic counterpoised dust family. The function H is smooth, positive, and satisfies ΔH=−3ab2(r2+b2)5/2<0,ρ(x)=3c2ab24πGNH(x)3(r2+b2)5/2. On the slice x0=constant the induced spatial metric is h=H2δijdxidxj. Define the candidate proper mass and signed charge by Mprop:=∫R3ρH3 dλ3,Qprop:=∫R3σH3 dλ3. The proof establishes that the first is a finite nonnegative Lebesgue integral and the second is a finite signed Lebesgue integral. They equal Mprop=c2aGN,Qprop=sQsc2aGN. The scalar curvature is Sg=−2ΔH/H3>0, the total stress satisfies WEC, NEC, SEC, and DEC, and the smooth matter density is positive at every point and has infinite spatial extent. For a=δb with 0<δ≤1, put h0(x):=b/r2+b2 and ρlin(x):=3c2δb34πGN(r2+b2)5/2. The same exact coupled solutions obey the pointwise Cartesian-coordinate bounds ∣g00+(1−2δh0)∣≤3δ2,∣gij−(1+2δh0)δij∣≤δ2,0≤1−ρρlin≤3δ. These are ideal mathematical estimates, not measurements or stability statements.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a,b>0, s∈{−1,+1}, ACω, the positive-root convention, the smooth family, and the Lebesgue measure and integral definitions.

[F1]

Explicit rational and real power regimes defines the unique positive square root and reciprocal integer powers for positive bases.

[F2]

The positive square-root branch is smooth: for q>0, the unique positive root s(q) is smooth and s′(q)=1/(2s(q)).

[F3]

Exact smooth superharmonic counterpoised dust family supplies the exact smooth formal solution family and the density ρ=−c2ΔH/(4πGNH3) for smooth positive H with ΔH≤0.

[F4]

EM, dust and perfect-fluid energy inequalities: the Maxwell tensor plus any nonnegative charged-dust tensor satisfies WEC, NEC, SEC, and DEC.

[F5]

Arbitrary-positive-H conformastatic Ricci and Einstein components gives Sg=−2ΔH/H3 and the arbitrary-positive-H Einstein table.

[F6]

Lebesgue measurable sets, the family L(Rn), and the restricted set function λn defines λ3, and The nonnegative Lebesgue integral defines the integral of a nonnegative measurable function as the supremum of its simple-function integrals.

[F7]

Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma: under ACω, for every nonnegative Borel f on R3, ∫R3f dλ3=∫0∞r2∫S2f(rω) dς2(ω) dr, where ς2 is the polar surface measure of The polar surface set function on the unit sphere. The symbol ς2 is used here to distinguish surface measure from the charge density σ.

[F8]

Sphere integrals in angle coordinates: under ACω, ς2(S2)=4π.

[F9]

Continuous functions on Euclidean spaces are Borel measurable and Assuming countable choice, every Borel subset of Rn is Lebesgue measurable: under ACω, continuous Euclidean functions are Borel and Borel sets are Lebesgue measurable; in particular the nonnegative integrand below is measurable for both suppliers.

[F10]

A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions applies under ACω to a C1 diffeomorphism of open Euclidean sets and transforms a nonnegative Lebesgue integral by the absolute Jacobian. Every singleton in R is Lebesgue null by Every affine hyperplane of Rn, and hence every proper linear subspace, is Lebesgue null.

[F11]

Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals defines a real signed integral by positive and negative parts and says integrability is equivalent to finiteness of ∫∣f∣; The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ) gives linearity on integrable functions.

[F13]

Continuous functions are Riemann integrable on a compact interval; their bounded Riemann and Lebesgue integrals agree under ACω; and Newton--Leibniz evaluates an integral from a continuous antiderivative with an integrable interior derivative. (A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion, A bounded Riemann integrable function on a closed bounded interval is Lebesgue measurable and has the same integral, Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on [a,b], differentiability on (a,b), and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative)

[F14]

For Riemann-integrable real functions on [u,v] with u<v, pointwise nonnegativity implies a nonnegative integral, pointwise order is preserved by integration, and a bound m≤h≤M implies m(v−u)≤∫uvh≤M(v−u) (If f≤g on [a,b] and both are integrable then ∫abf≤∫abg; and m(b−a)≤∫abf≤M(b−a)).

[A1]

Countable choice is limited to the indexed Axiom ACω of The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω); no full Axiom of Choice is assumed.

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F2F3F9F12algebra

Since r2+b2≥b2>0, [F1] gives the unique positive root Ψ, and [F2] makes it smooth with ∂iΨ=xi/Ψ. The chain, product and quotient rules [F12] then give Hi=−axi/Ψ3 and ∂iHi=−a(Ψ−3−3(xi)2Ψ−5), so ΔH=−a∑i=13(Ψ−3−3(xi)2Ψ−5)=−a(3Ψ−3−3r2Ψ−5)=−3ab2/Ψ5<0. The integrand ρH3=3c2ab2/[4πGN(r2+b2)5/2] is nonnegative and continuous on R3, hence Borel and Lebesgue measurable by [F9]. The coupled-dust theorem [F3] applies and supplies the smooth fields and exact formal solution.

2.1givenF6step 1.1algebra

On x0=constant the metric pullback is hij=H2δij, so det⁡h=H6 and its positive volume density is det⁡h=H3. Substituting the density from step 1.1 gives ρH3=3c2ab2/[4πGN(r2+b2)5/2], a nonnegative Borel integrand for [F6].

2.2step 1.1F4F5algebra

The curvature formula [F5] and strict negativity in step 1.1 give Sg=6ab2/(H3Ψ5)>0. The energy-condition theorem [F4] applies because ρ≥0. Since the density formula in step 1.1 is strictly positive for every x∈R3, the set of points where it is nonzero is all of R3; no compact subset of R3 contains all those points.

2.3givenF1F12F13F14step 1.1algebra

If a=δb, then H=1+z with z=δh0 and 0<h0≤1, since Ψ≥b. For f(u)=(1+u)−2, f(0)=1, f′(0)=−2, and 0<f′′(u)=6(1+u)−4≤6 for u≥0 by [F12]. Fix z>0 and define Gz(u):=(z−u)f′(u)+f(u) on [0,z]. The product rule [F12] gives Gz′(u)=(z−u)f′′(u) on its interior. This derivative is continuous on [0,z], hence Riemann integrable by [F13]; Gz is continuous there. Newton--Leibniz [F13] therefore gives ∫0z(z−u)f′′(u) du=Gz(z)−Gz(0)=f(z)−1+2z. The integrand lies between 0 and 6(z−u). These continuous comparison functions are integrable by [F13], so [F14] and Newton--Leibniz applied to 6zu−3u2 give 0≤f(z)−(1−2z)≤∫0z6(z−u) du=3z2≤3δ2. At z=0 the same remainder and bound are zero directly; no theorem requiring a nondegenerate interval is applied there. Since g00=−H−2, this proves the stated time-component bound.

3.1givenA1F6F7F8step 2.1algebra

Apply the polar formula [F7] to the integrand in step 2.1; it is constant on each sphere of radius r. The area factor [F8] then gives Mprop=(3c2ab2/GN)∫0∞r2(r2+b2)−5/2 dr. All uses of the polar formula are under exactly [A1]'s ACω hypothesis.

4.1givenA1F10F12F13step 3.1algebra

The radial integrand has finite value at r=0, and that singleton has measure zero by [F10], so its integral over [0,∞) equals its integral over (0,∞). On (0,π/2), cos⁡θ>0, and quotient differentiation with the sine/cosine derivatives and Pythagorean identity in [F12] gives (btan⁡θ)′=bsec⁡2θ>0. Also sin⁡ increases and cos⁡ decreases while remaining positive on this interval [F12], so tan⁡=sin⁡/cos⁡ is strictly increasing. Their continuity and quarter-turn values give limits 0 and +∞ at the interval's endpoints. For each y>0, choose interior points θ−<θ+ with T(θ−)<y<T(θ+); continuity on [θ−,θ+] and the intermediate value theorem [F12] give a preimage, and strict monotonicity gives uniqueness. Hence T(θ)=btan⁡θ is a bijection (0,π/2)→(0,∞). Since T′ never vanishes, the inverse function theorem [F12] gives C1 local inverses, which agree by bijectivity to form a global C1 inverse. Thus [F10] applies, and using cos⁡θ>0 to simplify gives ∫0∞r2(r2+b2)−5/2 dr=b−2∫0π/2sin⁡2θcos⁡θ dθ. The integrand is continuous on [0,π/2], so it is Riemann integrable and its Lebesgue integral agrees by [F13]; the endpoints have measure zero by [F10]. The function G(θ)=sin⁡3θ/3 has derivative sin⁡2θcos⁡θ on the interior by [F12], and Newton--Leibniz [F13] with sin⁡0=0, sin⁡(π/2)=1 yields 1/3. Thus the radial integral is 1/(3b2), and step 3.1 gives Mprop=c2a/GN<∞.

5.1step 4.1F3F11algebra

Put f=ρH3. By step 4.1, f≥0 and ∫f=Mprop<∞, so f is real integrable under [F11]. Since σH3=sQsf and sQs is a finite real constant, [F11] gives integrability of the signed charge density and Qprop=∫R3σH3 dλ3=sQs∫R3f dλ3=sQsMprop.

6.1givenF1F12F13F14step 2.3algebra∎

The spatial metric is exactly gij=H2δij=(1+2δh0+δ2h02)δij, so the component error is δ2h02∣δij∣≤δ2. Also ρ/ρlin=H−3=(1+z)−3. By [F12], the function P(u):=1−(1+u)−3 is continuously differentiable for u≥0 with P′(u)=3(1+u)−4. For z>0, [F13] makes this derivative integrable on [0,z] and gives 1−(1+z)−3=P(z)−P(0)=∫0z3(1+u)−4 du. Its integrand lies between 0 and 3, so [F14] yields 0≤1−ρ/ρlin≤3z≤3δ. At z=0 both sides vanish by substitution. This proves the density bound.

Remarks

The masses here are the integrals defined from the induced spatial volume density; no ADM-mass identification is used. The density's nonzero set is all of R3, and the family has a fixed signed charge-to-mass ratio. The dilute estimates compare exact coupled solutions with explicitly stated linear profiles; they do not assert stability or a general perturbation theorem.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources