How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Arbitrary-positive-H conformastatic Ricci and Einstein components — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Arbitrary-positive-H conformastatic Ricci and Einstein components
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Norms and Realification
- Complexification, Realification and Real Structures
- Connectedness
- Connections And Free Fall
- Connections Levi Civita and Parallel Transport
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Curvature And Tides
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Einstein And Matter
- Euclidean Ordinary Differential Equations with Smooth Dependence
- Euclidean Surface Measure, Divergence, and Green Identities
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Framework And Geometry
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Geodesics, the Exponential Map, Completeness, and Hopf–Rinow
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Improper Integrals
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Local potentials and smooth circle-bundle connection data
- Manifolds with Boundary Collars and Orientations
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Norming and Separation under Hahn–Banach
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Oriented Lorentzian fields, observers and coordinate conventions
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Picard-Lindelöf and First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations
- Pointwise Extended-Real Function Products
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Qm Math Orbital And Spin
- Radon Measures and the Riesz Markov Kakutani Theorem
- Rank Theorems and Embedded Submanifolds
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Riemann Curvature and Riemannian Submanifolds
- Riemannian Metrics Length Distance and Volume
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Simplicial Complexes and Simplicial Homology
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Singular Chains and Singular Homology
- Singular Cochains Mayer Vietoris and Smooth Singular Comparison
- Smooth formal matter, EM tensors and observer quantities
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Smooth Vector Bundles and Sections
- Spacetime Primitives
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- Tensor Fields Exterior Algebra and Differential Forms
- Tensors And Observers
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The de Rham Theorem and Degree
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Exponential Function
- The Exterior Derivative and Cartan Calculus
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Lebesgue and Riemann Integrals Compared
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Fields Flows and Lie Derivatives
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Volumes of Elementary Solids and Solids of Revolution
2 · Summary
Scope
These examples specialize the exact smooth family to a regular sphere and to a quantified dilute parameter range. The first checks the center values, proper mass and charge, and everywhere-positive density. The second records uniform metric and density comparison bounds and shows that, away from the origin, the static dust's nonzero electromagnetic force per unit mass equals its nonzero acceleration; at the origin both vanish and the central static worldline is geodesic. Both are exact mathematical calculations, not measurements or stability claims.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples
Regular smooth counterpoised sphere
Example
Assume . Let have length units, let , and define its Euclidean radius by . Take and in the exact family of Exact smooth superharmonic counterpoised dust family, and define on all of . For the family field strength , set , , and define the static-frame electric components by for . This is an everywhere regular smooth solution with center values Its proper mass and signed charge are and , respectively. The model density is positive everywhere, so its topological support, defined as the closure in of , is all of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , , the smooth family, the arbitrary-positive- curvature table, and the proper-integral result.
Exact smooth superharmonic counterpoised dust family supplies the exact coupled metric and fields, including , , and , with and the stated geometric conventions. The observer components used below are computed locally from this potential.
Globally regular sphere, proper integrals and dilute bounds gives finite proper mass and charge for the stated profile, under .
The positive-root function is smooth with derivative for (The positive square-root branch is smooth). The chain, product and quotient rules hold (The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
In a smooth coordinate chart, (The local coordinate formula for the exterior derivative), so .
Assume the indexed Axiom of The Axiom of Countable Choice (): every family of nonempty sets has a function on with for every . This is the assumption required by [F3]; no full Axiom of Choice is assumed.
Verification
Put . Since , [F4] and the chain rule give . Differentiating with the quotient rule in [F4] gives , hence . At , and . The Laplacian in [F3] gives .
Applying [F3] with and yields and . The exact-solution conclusion is [F1].
Substituting these values into [F1] gives , and [F2] gives . For the electric components, the metric in [F1] gives the future unit vector and positively oriented orthonormal spatial vectors by direct contraction. Since and , [F4]–[F5] give . Therefore , which vanishes at the center by step 1.1.
The formula in [F1] has and at every , hence throughout . The denominator never vanishes because , so the metric, potential, and fields extend smoothly through . The nonzero set of is therefore , whose closure is ; by the Statement's definition, this is its topological support.
Remarks
This is a regular ideal mathematical solution, not a reported object. The dust is held static by its electromagnetic force; no equilibrium stability, formation history, or real-particle composition is inferred.
Quantified dilute exact coupled family
Example
Assume . Let have length units and let be dimensionless with . Put and choose either charge sign in the exact coupled family. For , define the Euclidean radius and , so . Then where . These are exact ideal-family bounds, not measured errors. On , the static dust velocity field is . For each fixed and , define its static worldline by This is a smooth future-directed timelike curve with and ; , measured in seconds, is its proper-time parameter in the adopted length-coordinate convention. Here a static worldline is freely falling exactly when it is a geodesic, , with the connection of the exact family. Define the model's electromagnetic force per unit mass by ; this is defined everywhere for this profile since . For this profile, , so when both and are nonzero and . At both vectors vanish, and the central static worldline is geodesic.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , , , , and the exact family and dilute comparison of the corollary.
Globally regular sphere, proper integrals and dilute bounds supplies , the exact metric and density profile, and the bounds , , and .
Exact smooth superharmonic counterpoised dust family supplies , , and the identity .
The product and quotient differentiation rules hold for differentiable real functions where the denominator is nonzero (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
Continuous real functions on a compact interval are Riemann integrable (A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion). If a function is continuous on , differentiable inside, and its derivative has an integrable extension, Newton--Leibniz gives its endpoint difference (Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on , differentiability on , and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative). Pointwise order and nonnegativity are preserved by integrals on (If on and both are integrable then ; and ).
, so , , and .
Verification
Put . Since and both square roots are positive, and . By the metric formula in [F1], , so the time-component discrepancy is .
Define for . Twice applying the quotient/product rules [F3] gives and , between and . For fixed , set on . It is continuous with continuous derivative , which is integrable by [F4]. Newton--Leibniz [F4] gives The integrand lies between and , both continuous comparison functions. Integral monotonicity [F4], and Newton--Leibniz for the polynomial primitive , give . Thus the discrepancy in step 1.1 is at most ; [A1] further gives . At the same sharper comparison is zero by direct evaluation, without applying the nondegenerate-interval theorem.
The spatial bound in [F1] gives , since is or . The density identity in [F1] gives . Applying [A1] and combining with step 2.1 yields the three numerical bounds in the Example.
For the worldline defined in the Statement, , so its covariant acceleration is the supplier field . Here by [F1] and ; hence is nonzero when , while at . The supplier also gives . Dividing its all-component identity by positive gives everywhere. Thus both vectors are nonzero for and vanish at the center; only the noncentral static worldlines fail the geodesic definition of free fall.
Remarks
The numerical fractions are consequences of the ideal choice and are not experimental uncertainties. No measurement, statistical estimate, or general perturbation theorem is asserted.
Sources
- Sean M. Carroll, Lecture Notes on General Relativity, arXiv:gr-qc/9712019v1 (1997), Ch. 3, equations (3.90), (3.92), (3.95)
- David Tong, General Relativity, full author-hosted lecture notes, Michaelmas 2019, §3.4.1
- Reinhard Meinel and Moritz Hütten, On the black hole limit of electrically counterpoised dust configurations, arXiv:1105.3807v3 (2011), §2