Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck pending
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Worked flat slab: a rational temporal function with Cauchy levels, complete flow and orthogonal product

Example

Assume Countable Choice and Dependent Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain) for the general absolutely continuous causal-curve conclusions used here.

Let (M,g,N) be the flat slab (0,1)×R3 of The open flat slab: an incomplete timelike geodesic, a Cauchy slice and global hyperbolicity, with restricted inertial chart x=(t,z), restricted metric g=η∣M and time orientation N=∂0∣M, and with the Cauchy slice Σ1/2=x−1({1/2}×R3). Define the rational function T:M→R,T(x−1(t,z)):=t1−t−1t+1. This example verifies, by explicit computation, that T satisfies all the conclusions of Smooth Cauchy temporal splitting: a global temporal function with Cauchy levels and an orthogonal complete flow in this model: past-timelike gradient, Cauchy levels, complete flow of the normalized gradient field X=∇T/g(∇T,∇T), and the orthogonal product form.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The flat slab (M,g,N) of The open flat slab: an incomplete timelike geodesic, a Cauchy slice and global hyperbolicity with chart x=(t,z) and the function T.

[L1]

Slab facts: (M,g,N) is a time-oriented smooth Lorentzian four-manifold with constant metric components diag⁡(−1,1,1,1) in the chart x; every curve in M is future causal or future timelike for (M,g) exactly when it is so for the ambient flat model with its inertial chart; and the half-time slice is a spacelike Cauchy hypersurface (The open flat slab: an incomplete timelike geodesic, a Cauchy slice and global hyperbolicity clauses (a)-(c), Spacelike hypersurfaces, acausal sets, Cauchy sets, domains of dependence and Cauchy horizons, Causal curves, chronological and causal reachability, and inextendibility, Chronology, causality, strong causality, global hyperbolicity and time functions).

[L5]

Every future causal slab curve has strictly increasing continuous time coordinate and ∣z(γ(v))−z(γ(u))∣≤t(γ(v))−t(γ(u)) for u<v (Monotonicity of inertial time and the Lipschitz graph property for causal curves in the flat model). Cauchy sequences in R3 converge (R and Rn for n≥1 with the Euclidean metric are complete, componentwise from the Cauchy criterion in R).

[L2]

Calculus: on (0,1) one has ddtt1−t=1(1−t)2 and ddt1t=−1t2, so T′(t)=1(1−t)2+1t2>0; T is smooth, strictly increasing, with lim⁡t→0+T(t)=−∞ and lim⁡t→1−T(t)=+∞, so T is a bijection (0,1)→R with a smooth inverse T−1:R→(0,1) and (T−1)′(u)=1/T′(T−1(u)) (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: (f+g)′(c)=f′(c)+g′(c), (αf)′(c)=αf′(c), (fg)′(c)=f′(c)g(c)+f(c)g′(c), and (f/g)′(c)=(f′(c)g(c)−f(c)g′(c))/g(c)2 when g(c)≠0, Derivative of an inverse: if f is continuous and injective on a nondegenerate interval I and differentiable at c∈I with f′(c)≠0, then the inverse g is differentiable at f(c) with g′(f(c))=1/f′(c); and if f′(c)=0 then g is not differentiable at f(c), A real-valued continuous map on a connected space has order-convex image, so it takes every value between any two of its values, Continuity of f:A→R at a point of A and on A: the ε-δ condition, its agreement with lim⁡x→cf(x)=f(c) at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point, Cr and smooth maps between smooth manifolds).

[L3]

Gradient form: with ∇ the inverse metric of The inverse metric, musical isomorphisms and index raising, ∇T=T′(t) (−∂0); indeed dT=T′(t) dt and g(−∂0,w)=w0=dt(w) on M because g(∂0,∂0)=−1 and g(∂0,∂i)=0. A differentiable function on an interval with vanishing derivative is constant (A function continuous on an interval I whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of I is constant on I; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant).

[L4]

Cone and orthogonality: a nonzero tangent vector is future timelike exactly when its components satisfy v0>∣vvec∣ in the chart, the past-direction is the negative of the future direction, and for the timelike g-gradient of a function the orthogonal decomposition below holds (The causal cones of the flat model in inertial coordinates, and closure of the future cone under sums, Timelike, null, spacelike and causal vectors of a Lorentz vector space, eta-orthogonality and orthogonal complements in a Lorentz vector space).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L2L3L4

(The gradient is past timelike and X(T)=1.) By [L3], ∇T=−T′∂0 with T′>0 by [L2]. Hence g(∇T,∇T)=−T′2<0, so ∇T is timelike, and its direction is −∂0, which is past-directed because ∂0=N is future-directed [L4]; thus T is a temporal function in the sense of Chronology, causality, strong causality, global hyperbolicity and time functions clause (e). Define X:=∇T/g(∇T,∇T)=∂0/T′. Then X is future-directed timelike and X(T)=T′(t)⋅dt(X)=T′⋅1T′=1.

2.1step 1.1L1L2L4L5

(The levels are Cauchy.) The level sets of T are exactly the coordinate slices x−1({t}×R3) with 0<t<1: T depends only on t and is strictly increasing [L2]. For an inextendible future causal curve, [L5] gives strictly increasing time coordinate and the spatial increment bound. If its future time limit were b<1, its spatial coordinates would be Cauchy and converge in R3, giving an interior slab point limit because b≥t(γ(s0))>0. This contradicts future-inextendibility. Dually its past time limit cannot exceed zero, so the time range is exactly (0,1). Continuity and strict increase then give exactly one parameter at every coordinate slice. The slice chart and positive spatial metric make each slice a spacelike embedded hypersurface; since T takes each real value on exactly one slice, every inextendible causal curve meets every level of T exactly once. Consequently T takes every real value (each level is nonempty) and T→+∞ along every inextendible future-directed causal curve and T→−∞ along every inextendible past-directed one: a future-directed causal curve meets the level {T=c} for every c, and T is strictly increasing along it by [L4] and the gradient computation, so it cannot turn back.

2.2step 1.1L2

(The flow is complete and explicit.) By [L2] let u↦σ(u):=T−1(u) be the smooth inverse of T. Fix (t0,z0) and put γ(s):=x−1(σ(s+T(t0)),z0). Since σ takes values in (0,1), the curve stays in M for every s∈R; it is smooth; and by the chain rule and [L2] its t-coordinate satisfies ddsσ(s+T(t0))=σ′(s+T(t0))=1T′(σ(s+T(t0))). Hence the chart velocity of γ is (1/T′(t),0,0,0)=X(γ(s)) in the chart components, so γ is an integral curve of X defined on all of R. The maximal integral curve of X through any point therefore has domain R (an integral curve defined on a larger interval cannot exist because γ covers the whole maximal interval: the uniqueness theorem identifies all integral curves through a common point on overlaps), so X is complete and its flow Φ:R×M→M is global and smooth (Through each point there is a unique maximal integral curve, Complete vector fields, A vector field is complete if and only if its flow is global, Local and global flows generated by a vector field).

3.1step 1.1step 2.2L2L3L4

(The orthogonal product form.) Put β:=−1/g(∇T,∇T)=1/T′2>0 and hT:=g+β dT⊗dT. By [L3], β dT⊗dT=(1/T′2)(T′2 dt⊗dt)=dt⊗dt, so hT=δij dxi⊗dxj on the spatial coordinates: it is the Euclidean metric on ker⁡dT=span⁡(∂1,∂2,∂3), positive definite and smooth, and g=−dt⊗dt+hT. Moreover X=∂0/T′ satisfies hT(X,⋅)=0 because dt(X)≠0 is compensated exactly as in the general computation hT(X,⋅)=g(X,⋅)+βdT=−βdT+βdT=0. The flow map Ψ:R×Σ1/2→M, Ψ(s,⋅)=x−1(σ(s+T(1/2)),⋅), is a bijection because σ∘T=id(0,1) and T∘σ=idR, and it is a diffeomorphism since both maps are smooth; its pullback of g is −(β∘Ψ) ds2+h with h the Euclidean metric on Σ1/2.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1∎

(Summary.) The rational function T is a temporal function on the globally hyperbolic slab whose levels are the Cauchy slices, whose normalized gradient field X=∂0/T′ is complete with explicit flow s↦σ(s+T(t0)), and whose metric splits orthogonally as g=−β dT⊗dT+hT with β>0 and hT Riemannian on the levels. This realises the conclusions (a)-(f) of Smooth Cauchy temporal splitting: a global temporal function with Cauchy levels and an orthogonal complete flow in an explicit model.

Remarks

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources