Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Orbital angular momentum eigenfunctions: the low spherical harmonics of the massive model

Physical scope

Explicit low-degree computations inside the angular theory of the massive model: the degree-zero and degree-one spherical harmonics, their orthonormality on the sphere and their eigenvalue equations for the third orbital generator and the orbital Casimir form, together with the citation of the general eigenstate theorem. The example concerns the spatial angular factor; it asserts no dynamics, no radial spectrum, no measurement and no empirical value.

Example

Adopt the mass parameter m>0, a spin label s and the angular momentum readings of Orbital, spin and total angular momentum of the massive spin-s model: assigned sharp observables, units and readings for the massive spin-s model of The massive spin-s particle model of the framework: state space, operators, units and frame readings, and assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let Ylm be the spherical harmonics of Associated Legendre function normalization and hlm their harmonic polynomial representatives of Harmonic polynomial dimension clause (c), and let Lisph be the self-adjoint orbital generators on L2(S2,σ) of Orbital self-adjoint generators, and let Di=(x×∇)i act on polynomials on R3. The polynomial and sphere actions are related by LisphYlm=res⁡l(−iℏDihlm) as specified by that theorem. Then:

(i) the harmonic polynomial representatives of the degrees l=0 and l=1 are h00=14π,h10=34π x3,h1,1=−38π (x1+ix2),h1,−1=38π (x1−ix2), and the family (Y00,Y1,−1,Y10,Y11) is orthonormal in L2(S2,σ);

(ii) on the degree-one block, L3sphY1m=ℏm Y1m,∑i=13(Lisph)2F=2ℏ2F(F∈V1), while the corresponding polynomial identity is −iℏD3h1m=ℏmh1m on R3; on the degree-zero block LisphY00=0 for every i, so ∑i(Lisph)2Y00=0;

(iii) more generally, for every l≥0 and m∈{−l,…,l} one has L3sphYlm=ℏmYlm; for every nonzero R∈Cc∞((0,∞)) and unit w∈Cr, the normalized model vector φ=R(∣x∣)hlm(x)w/∥R(∣x∣)hlm(x)w∥ satisfies ∑i∥Liφ∥2=ℏ2l(l+1). Thus the low-degree computations of (i),(ii) are the first two cases of the sphere identities.

The low-degree sphere computations are independent of the radial profile; clause (iii) uses a nonzero radial profile to form a normalized model vector. The example involves no dynamics, no detector and no empirical input.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A mass parameter m>0 and a spin label s; the harmonic polynomials hlm and the sphere functions Ylm; the orbital generators Li with Di=(x×∇)i; the polar surface measure σ with σ(S2)=4π.

[F1]

Low harmonics. The associated-polynomial normalization gives w00=P0=1, w10=P1=t, w11=−(1−t2)1/2 with b00=(∫−111 dt)−1/2=2−1/2, b10=(∫−11t2dt)−1/2=3/2 and b11=(∫−11(1−t2)dt)−1/2=3/4, and the polynomial representatives are h00=b00/2π, h10=b10 x3/2π and h1,±1=∓b11(x1±ix2)/2π (Associated Legendre function normalization clauses (c),(e), Harmonic polynomial dimension clause (c)).

[F2]

Sphere integrals. For the coordinate functions Ωj(x)=xj/∣x∣ one has ∫S2ΩiΩj dσ=4π3δij and ∫S21 dσ=4π, computed in angle coordinates Φ(θ,φ) with sin⁡θ d(θ,φ) (Sphere integrals in angle coordinates, The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a), The addition formulas for sine and cosine, Sine and cosine defined by their real power series).

[F3]

Core action and Casimir on blocks. For polynomial representatives one has LisphF=resl(−iℏDipF) and ∑i(Lisph)2F=ℏ2l(l+1)F for F∈Vl, and L3sphYlm=ℏmYlm (Orbital self-adjoint generators clauses (a),(c), The orbital Casimir identity: the restrictions of the orbital generators to the degree-l blocks are spin-l models clauses (b),(c)).

[F4]

Defined model generators and polar integration. The assigned spatial orbital generator Li generates the given coordinate rotations Ui(t)f(x)=f(Ri(−t)x), with strong derivative generator Gi=−iLi/ℏ (Orbital, spin and total angular momentum of the massive spin-s model: assigned sharp observables, units and readings clause (b)). Its domain consists exactly of the vectors for which (Ui(t)f−f)/t has a two-sided limit in Hs, and Gif is that limit (Infinitesimal generator of a unitary group). Under Countable Choice, polar integration gives ∫R3f(x) dx=∫0∞∫S2f(rΩ)r2 dσ(Ω) dr for every nonnegative Borel f (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).

Verification

technique · direct; insert the explicit low-degree polynomials, evaluate the sphere integrals in angle coordinates, and apply the polynomial action of the generators and the Casimir identity on the degree-one block

Given: The data of the example and [F1]-[F4].

1.1F1algebra

[Low polynomials] Substituting the constants of [F1] gives h00=2−1/2(2π)−1/2=(4π)−1/2, h10=3/2(2π)−1/2x3=3/(4π)x3, and h1,±1=∓3/4(2π)−1/2(x1±ix2)=∓3/(8π)(x1±ix2), which are the displayed polynomials of (i); each is harmonic and homogeneous of the stated degree by [F1].

1.2F1F3F4algebra

[General sphere identity and the spatial generator domain] The general sphere identity L3sphYlm=ℏmYlm is [F3]. Put ψ(x)=R(∣x∣)hlm(x)w, extended by zero at 0. Its support lies in a fixed compact annulus, so it is smooth there and zero near 0. Rotations preserve ∣x∣, hence by [F4], Ui(t)ψ(x)=R(∣x∣)hlm(Ri(−t)x)w. In the fixed finite-dimensional space of homogeneous degree-l polynomials, the coefficients of hlm(Ri(−t)x) are smooth functions of t; differentiating the rotation matrices at 0 gives the polynomial derivative −Dihlm. Each fixed polynomial times R(∣x∣)w belongs to Hs by [F4], since it is bounded and compactly supported. Thus coefficientwise convergence of the finitely many difference quotients gives convergence in Hs to −R(∣x∣)Dihlm(x)w. The domain definition in [F4] proves ψ∈D(Li) and Liψ=−iℏR(∣x∣)Dihlm(x)w. This establishes the needed full spatial action directly for these vectors, using the assigned operators without a general spectral or Stone construction.

2.1step 1.1F2algebra

[Sphere norms and orthogonality] By [F2] and step 1.1, ∫S2∣Y00∣2dσ=14π⋅4π=1; ∫S2∣Y10∣2dσ=34π∫Ω32dσ=34π⋅4π3=1; and ∫S2∣Y1,±1∣2dσ=38π∫(Ω12+Ω22)dσ=38π⋅8π3=1. The mixed products with Y00 integrate to zero: Ω1 and Ω2 have zero φ-integrals, while ∫0πcos⁡θsin⁡θ dθ=0 for Ω3, by the angle formula and the trigonometric primitives in [F2]. The mixed products of Y10 with Y1,±1 vanish by ∫Ω3Ω1 dσ=∫Ω3Ω2 dσ=0 from [F2]. Finally, Y11Y1,−1‾=−38π(Ω12−Ω22+2iΩ1Ω2) has zero integral because [F2] gives equal second moments for Ω1,Ω2 and a zero cross moment; the reversed mixed integrals are their complex conjugates. Hence the four functions are orthonormal.

2.2step 1.1F3algebra

[Degree-one eigenvalues] By step 1.1, direct differentiation gives D3h1m=(x1∂2−x2∂1)h1m=im h1m for m=−1,0,1, hence −iℏD3h1m=ℏmh1m as a polynomial identity; restricting to the sphere and using [F3] gives L3sphY1m=ℏmY1m. The Casimir identity of [F3] with l=1 gives ∑i(Lisph)2F=2ℏ2F for F∈V1. For l=0, each Dih00=0, so [F3] gives LisphY00=0 and therefore ∑i(Lisph)2Y00=0. This proves (ii).

3.1step 1.2step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2F1F3F4algebra∎

[Radial norm and Casimir form] By homogeneity, hlm(rΩ)=rlYlm(Ω), and −iℏDihlm is the homogeneous polynomial representative of LisphYlm by [F3]. Polar integration [F4] and ∥w∥=∥Ylm∥=1 therefore give ∥ψ∥2=AR and ∥Liψ∥2=AR∥LisphYlm∥2, where AR=∫0∞∣R(r)∣2r2l+2 dr<∞. Since R is nonzero and continuous, it is bounded below in modulus by a positive constant on some nondegenerate interval inside (0,∞), so AR>0. The sphere generators preserve Vl and are self-adjoint there; hence [F3] gives ∑i∥LisphYlm∥2=⟨∑i(Lisph)2Ylm,Ylm⟩=ℏ2l(l+1). Dividing the spatial norm identities by AR proves ∑i∥Li(ψ/∥ψ∥)∥2=ℏ2l(l+1), the rest of (iii). Together with steps 1.1, 2.1 and 2.2 this completes (i)-(iii), under the stated Countable Choice hypothesis.

Remarks

  • The l=0 exception. The vanishing of all three components on Y00 illustrates that a state with zero total orbital angular momentum has every component sharp at value zero; the noncommutation of two components on other states is not contradicted.
  • Radial scope. Clause (iii) is verified locally from the defined rotation generators on the displayed compactly supported radial harmonics. The broader eigenstate and outcome-law theorem Orbital angular momentum eigenstates of the massive model: spherical harmonics, the l,m quantum numbers and the Casimir value also addresses their measurement laws under its additional Choice premise; those laws are not used here. No radial dynamics or radial energy equation is solved here.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources