How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Subcritical singularity has a unique same-degree extension
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Fix and a real . Define for and choose ; this point value does not affect any integral. On , let be the regular distribution induced by . If , then , and its regular extension
has scaling degree and is the unique extension of with that same scaling degree. At the critical exponent , still has scaling degree on , but the regular integral diverges logarithmically at ; its same-degree extensions exist but form an affine line .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, , , and on .
Scaling degree and local extension space: for a regular distribution induced by , .
AC implies DC implies countable choice: AC implies AC.
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): AC selects from every countable sequence of nonempty sets.
Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma uses the measure of The polar surface set function on the unit sphere and, under AC, gives for nonnegative Borel .
Regular distribution from a locally integrable function: a locally integrable function acts by .
Locally integrable functions embed in distributions: under AC, the regular functional is a distribution and the map from modulo almost-everywhere equality is injective.
Scaling degree and local extension space: the scaling degree is the infimum of the exponents for which the dilated distribution tends to zero on every fixed test.
Point-extension counterterms form a finite delta-jet space: for every finite real scaling degree , the same-degree extension family is nonempty by the extension theorem; it is a singleton for , and at it is .
A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included: a nondegenerate box has its positive product volume.
Test function cutoffs and euclidean localization: every compact subset of an open set admits a nonnegative smooth compactly supported cutoff equal to one near that compact set.
Assume AC; it supplies AC by [F2].
Verification
Given: The hypotheses of the example.
By [A1] and [F2]–[F3], AC holds, so [F4] applies. On compact subsets of , is bounded and therefore defines the regular distribution . Put , , and . By [F10] choose with and near . For the box lies in , since on . By [F9], ; on we have , , and , so . For , the unit ball integral is It follows that , and [F5]–[F6] give the regular distribution .
The dilation formula [F1] and the change of variables in the regular integral give . For every , . For every , the nonnegative annular test from step 1.1 has positive pairing with . Therefore does not tend to zero. Hence , and its restriction to is .
Since , the subcritical uniqueness clause [F8] applies to and the extension from step 1.1. Thus every extension of with scaling degree equals .
At , [F1] gives . Thus every gives convergence to zero; for , the nonnegative annular test from step 1.1 has positive pairing with , so the rescaled pairing does not tend to zero. Hence . The polar integral is then . Its coefficient is positive: with , choose a box for . Then for , so ; [F9] gives , while [F4] gives . Hence . If a locally integrable induced a regular extension of , then ; the injectivity in [F6] on gives almost everywhere there, so its absolute integral on the punctured unit ball has the same logarithmic divergence. Thus no regular-distribution extension exists. By [F8], the same-degree distributional extension family exists and is .
Depends on
The Axiom of Choice
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
The polar surface set function on the unit sphere
Scaling degree and local extension space
Regular distribution from a locally integrable function
Test function cutoffs and euclidean localization
Point-extension counterterms form a finite delta-jet space
AC implies DC implies countable choice
A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included
Locally integrable functions embed in distributions
Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- R. Brunetti and K. Fredenhagen, Microlocal Analysis and Interacting Quantum Field Theories: Renormalization on Physical Backgrounds, §5.2
- Klaus Fredenhagen and Katarzyna Rejzner, “Perturbative Algebraic Quantum Field Theory,” in Mathematical Aspects of Quantum Field Theories, ed. Damien Calaque and Thomas Strobl, Springer (2015), Section 7
- K. J. Keller, Dimensional Regularization in Position Space and a Forest Formula for Regularized Epstein-Glaser Renormalization, dissertation, §I.1