Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Scalar symmetry factor and conditional lifetime model

Physical scope

A massless-daughter scalar formal coefficient example. It explicitly adds an exponential survival model before deriving a mean and half-life; the formal rate coefficient by itself implies neither time law.

Statement

Assume Countable Choice, ACω The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), as required by the cited phase-space map and the Borel restriction of Lebesgue measure.

Let s>0, dimensionless λ∈R, parent energy M0>0, and GE∈C∖{0} in joules. For scattering, take the incoming p1,p2 and outgoing k1,k2 on the positive massless scalar shell, each (E,q) having E=∣q∣>0, with common total p1+p2=k1+k2=P, h(P,P)=s>0, and evaluate the coefficient in a proper orthochronous center-of-momentum chart ΛP=(s,0) as in the phase-space supplier. For decay, take massless positive-shell daughters summing to the rest parent P0=(M0,0). With these data the identical final-state quartic total coefficient is σcoeffidentical=λ2(ℏc)232πs, and the distinguishable-final coefficient is twice this value. The identical-daughter decay-rate coefficient is Γcoeff=∣GE∣232πℏM0[s−1]. Set Γ:=Γcoeff>0. For the lifetime calculation only, let (Ξ,F,P) be a probability space in the sense of Probability measures and probability spaces: F is a sigma-algebra on Ξ, and P is a countably additive measure with P(Ξ)=1. Let B([0,∞)) be the sigma-algebra generated by sets U∩[0,∞) for open U⊆R, as in The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space. Let T:Ξ→[0,∞) be a parent lifetime measured in seconds and measurable in the explicit sense that T−1(B)∈F for every B∈B([0,∞)). Define its law by μT(B):=P(T−1(B)) on those Borel sets. Let ℓ denote one-dimensional Lebesgue measure from Lebesgue measurable sets, the family L(Rn), and the restricted set function λn, restricted to B([0,∞)); this restriction is a measure by Assuming countable choice, every Borel subset of Rn is Lebesgue measurable under the stated Countable Choice assumption. Separately assume the exponential lifetime model, defined by μT(B)=∫BΓe−Γt dℓ(t)for every B∈B([0,∞)). It gives Psurv(t):=P(T−1((t,∞)))=e−Γt for t≥0. Define the mean lifetime as E[T]:=∫[0,∞)t dμT(t), and define the half-life t1/2 by Psurv(t1/2)=1/2. Then the mean lifetime is 1/Γ and the half-life is ln⁡2/Γ. The exponential law is not a consequence of the formal coefficient calculation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω); the positive-shell scattering and decay data in the Statement, and the scalar amplitude conventions and coefficient maps of Scalar symmetry factors and decay coefficient units, Complete two-body phase space and coefficient flux map, and Formal diagram coefficient-to-observable adoption.

[F1]

Scalar symmetry factors and decay coefficient units: for identical equal-mass scalars the full-sphere quartic coefficient is λ2(ℏc)2/(32πs); distinguishable final particles give twice this value. The identical-daughter rate coefficient is ∣GE∣21−4ms2/M02/(32πℏM0).

[F2]

QFT example units, metric, gauge, and pairing conventions: [ℏ]=J s and [ℏc]=J m; s is in J2.

[F3]

Probability measures and probability spaces: a probability space is a triple (Ξ,F,P) where F is a sigma-algebra on Ξ and P is a countably additive measure with P(Ξ)=1.

[F4]

The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space: the Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space is generated by its open sets.

[F5]

Lebesgue measurable sets, the family L(Rn), and the restricted set function λn: one-dimensional Lebesgue measure is the restriction of Lebesgue outer measure to the Lebesgue sigma-algebra.

[F6]

Assuming countable choice, every Borel subset of Rn is Lebesgue measurable: under Countable Choice, every Borel subset of R is Lebesgue measurable, so ℓ denotes its restriction to the stated Borel sigma-algebra.

[A1]

Formal diagram coefficient-to-observable adoption: formal coefficients are adopted leading readings only; no survival law follows from the rate map.

[A2]

For the lifetime calculation only, assume the exponential probability law for T defined in the Statement, with Γ=Γcoeff. This assumption is not part of [A1] or the formal coefficient maps.

Example

The massless special case exposes both the full-sphere identical-particle factor and the distinction between a rate coefficient and a decay law.

Verification

1.1givenF1F2algebra

Set the daughter rest energy to zero in [F1]. The square-root threshold factor becomes 1, so the identical total coefficient is λ2(ℏc)2/(32πs) and the distinguishable total is twice that. The cross-section unit is (J m)2/J2=m2. For the same massless daughter specialization, [F1] gives Γcoeff=∣GE∣232πℏM0. Its unit is J2/(J s J)=s−1, so it is a rate coefficient. Since GE≠0, ℏ>0, and M0>0, this coefficient is strictly positive.

2.1step 1.1F3F4F5F6A1A2algebra∎

By [A2], μT(B)=∫BΓe−Γt dℓ(t) for Borel B⊆[0,∞). Taking B=[0,∞) gives total mass 1, and the mean is E[T]=∫0∞tΓe−Γt dt=[−te−Γt]0∞+∫0∞e−Γt dt=1Γ, by integration by parts; te−Γt→0 since Γ>0. The survival function is continuous and strictly decreasing from 1 to 0, so the defining equation for t1/2 has a unique solution; solving e−Γt1/2=1/2 gives t1/2=ln⁡2/Γ. These formulas use [A2], not the formal rate coefficient alone; no experiment or detector record is specified.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources