Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Positive vacuum correlation for spacelike-separated massless tests

Example

Assume Countable Choice. In the massless model μ=0, there are nonnegative real test functions f,g∈Cc∞(R4) with spacelike-separated supports for which ⟨Ω,Φ0(f)Ω⟩2=⟨Ω,Φ0(g)Ω⟩2=0,⟨Ω,Φ0(f)Φ0(g)Ω⟩2>0. The corresponding local Weyl operators commute by Isotony and spacelike commutativity of scalar local Weyl algebras. The nonzero correlation is a mathematical vacuum expectation in the specified representation; it is not a measurement or a signaling effect.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The massless shell measure and Fourier restriction of Scalar future mass shell, invariant measure and test restriction, the vacuum two-point formula of Smeared free scalar field and its Poincare representation, the causal and local-algebra results, and a smooth compactly supported nonnegative bump.

[A1]
[F1]

For real tests the vacuum one-point function vanishes and ⟨Ω,Φ0(f)Φ0(g)Ω⟩2=⟨K0f,K0g⟩2. Smeared free scalar field and its Poincare representation

[F2]

Spacelike-separated real tests have commuting fields and generate commuting local Weyl algebras. Causal support of the scalar commutator distribution Isotony and spacelike commutativity of scalar local Weyl algebras

[F3]

The massless shell measure is d3k/[(2π)32∣k∣], with phase ei(∣k∣t−k⋅x). Scalar future mass shell, invariant measure and test restriction

[F4]

Smooth compactly supported bumps exist in Euclidean balls. A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls

[F5]

Dominated convergence applies to the integrable majorant below. Dominated convergence

[F6]

Absolutely integrable functions on products of sigma-finite measure spaces may be integrated in either order. Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product

Verification

1.1F4givenconstruct

Choose δ>0. By [F4], choose a nonnegative nonzero χ∈Cc∞((−δ,δ)). Choose two nonnegative nonzero u,v∈Cc∞(R3) supported in closed balls of radii r1,r2 whose center separation D satisfies D−r1−r2>2δ. Such bumps follow by translating and rescaling [F4]. Set f(t,x)=χ(t)u(x) and g(t,x)=χ(t)v(x). For every point in the two supports, ∣t−s∣<2δ and ∣x−y∣≥D−r1−r2>2δ; therefore all support differences are spacelike. For example, δ=1, r1=r2=1 and D=5 give a spatial gap of 3>2, so these strict inequalities are attainable.

2.1F3step 1.1givenalgebra

Insert a radial regulator e−ϵ∣k∣, ϵ>0, in the massless two-point kernel. Angular integration using [F3] gives for r=∣x−y∣>0 and τ=t−s Wϵ(τ,r)=14π2r∫0∞e−(ϵ+iτ)qsin⁡(qr) dq=14π2(r2+(ϵ+iτ)2). The integral identity follows by integrating the two exponentials in the sine and using Re⁡(ϵ+iτ)>0. On the compact support product in 1.1, r≥d:=D−r1−r2>2δ>∣τ∣. Thus the denominator is bounded away from zero uniformly as ϵ↓0, and Wϵ converges uniformly there to [4π2(r2−τ2)]−1, which is strictly positive.

3.1A1F1F2F3F5F6F7step 2.1step 1.1givenalgebra∎

The regulated shell integrals converge to ⟨K0f,K0g⟩2 by dominated convergence [F5]: the absolute value of the unregulated product is integrable by Cauchy–Schwarz [F7], because K0f,K0g∈H0. To identify the regulated shell integral with the spacetime pairing of Wϵ, Fubini [F6] applies because its absolute integral is at most ∥f∥1∥g∥1∫R3e−ϵ∣k∣d3k/[(2π)32∣k∣]<∞. The formula in 2.1 and uniform convergence on the compact support product give ⟨K0f,K0g⟩2=∫f(t,x)g(s,y)d4x d4y4π2(∣x−y∣2−(s−t)2)>0, because both test functions are nonnegative and nonzero and the denominator is positive on the support product. More explicitly, ⟨K0f,K0g⟩2≥(∫f)(∫g)/[4π2(D+r1+r2)2]>0, since ∣x−y∣2−(t−s)2≤(D+r1+r2)2 there. The zero one-point values follow from [F1]; commutation follows from [F2] and separation in step 1.1.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources