Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Uniform convergence of a C2 sequence with its first and second derivatives on a rectangle passes C2 regularity and termwise differentiation to the limit

Statement

Let T,L>0 and R:=[0,T]×[0,L] (Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length). For each k∈N let uk be of class C2 on an open neighbourhood of R (Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn). Suppose that on R:

uk→u,∂tuk→v,∂xuk→w,∂t2uk→v2,∂t∂xuk→z,∂x2uk→w2

pointwise for u and uniformly for the five derivative sequences (Continuity of f:A→R at a point of A and on A: the ε-δ condition, its agreement with lim⁡x→cf(x)=f(c) at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point). Then u is C2 on the interior of R, all listed limits are continuous on R, and on the interior

∂tu=v,∂xu=w,∂t2u=v2,∂t∂xu=∂x∂tu=z,∂x2u=w2,

the derivatives extending continuously to R.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The rectangle R, the C2 sequence uk and the stated convergences.

[F1]

One-variable theorem: if fk:[a,b]→R are continuously differentiable, fk(c)→A at one point and fk′→g uniformly on [a,b], then fk→f uniformly for a differentiable f with f′=g (If continuously differentiable functions converge at one point and their derivatives converge uniformly on a closed interval, then the functions converge uniformly to a differentiable function whose derivative is the derivative limit).

[F3]
[F4]

If g is C2 on an open neighbourhood of a point (t,x), then its two mixed partials agree there. For small h,k>0, the rectangular increment g(t+h,x+k)−g(t+h,x)−g(t,x+k)+g(t,x), divided by hk, is both the average of ∂x∂tg and the average of ∂t∂xg over the rectangle, by applying the one-variable fundamental theorem in the two orders; continuity of both second partials makes the respective averages tend to their values at (t,x) as h,k↓0 (The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a), A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion).

Proof

technique · direct; apply the one-variable uniform-differentiation theorem in each variable separately
1.1givenF1

Fix x∈[0,L] and apply [F1] to the sequence t↦uk(t,x) on [0,T] with c=0: uk(0,x)→u(0,x) and ∂tuk(⋅,x)→v(⋅,x) uniformly on [0,T] (the convergence of ∂tuk is uniform on all of R, hence on the slice). We obtain: t↦u(t,x) is differentiable on [0,T] with ∂tu(t,x)=v(t,x), and uk(⋅,x)→u(⋅,x) uniformly on [0,T]. Applying the same statement to ∂tuk(⋅,x) with its t-derivative ∂t2uk(⋅,x)→v2(⋅,x), t↦v(t,x) is differentiable with ∂tv(t,x)=v2(t,x).

1.2givenF1F4

Fix t∈[0,T] and apply [F1] in the variable x to x↦uk(t,x) and to x↦∂xuk(t,x): x↦u(t,x) has ∂xu(t,x)=w(t,x), and x↦w(t,x) has ∂xw(t,x)=w2(t,x). Applying [F1] in x to x↦∂tuk(t,x) is legitimate because its x-derivative equals ∂t∂xuk by [F4]; the limits are v(t,x) and z(t,x), so ∂xv(t,x)=z(t,x). Applying [F1] in t to the sequence t↦∂xuk(t,x), whose values converge to w(t,x) and whose derivatives converge uniformly to z(t,x), gives ∂tw(t,x)=z(t,x).

2.1step 1.1step 1.2F2F3F4∎

The functions v,w,v2,z,w2 are continuous on R as uniform limits of continuous functions [F2]. Fix (t0,x0)∈R. By continuity, v and w are bounded on a relative neighbourhood of (t0,x0). The integral-evaluation theorem The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a), with continuous slice derivatives integrable by A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion and reversed endpoints handled by The integral with oriented limits: ∫aaf:=0 and ∫baf:=−∫abf, and steps 1.1-1.2 give, for (t,x) in that neighbourhood, u(t,x)−u(t0,x0)=∫x0xw(t0,s) ds+∫t0tv(s,x) ds. Thus ∣u(t,x)−u(t0,x0)∣≤Mw∣x−x0∣+Mv∣t−t0∣ for local bounds Mw,Mv, proving continuity of u on R, including its boundary. Steps 1.1-1.2 identify the first and second partial derivatives of u with these continuous functions; in particular ∂t∂xu=∂x∂tu=z. By [F3], u is C2 on the interior of R with the stated derivatives, all extending continuously to R.

Remarks

  • Only partial derivatives up to order two are needed, and all hypotheses are uniform on the compact rectangle. The lemma is used for the sine-series solution of the string, whose partial sums carry the differentiated convergences estimated uniformly.

  • The conclusion does not require the mixed partial derivatives to be assumed continuous in advance beyond being limits of continuous functions; their agreement follows from the two identifications with the same limit z (the one-variable theorem applied in the two variable orders).

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources