Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Well-defined elastic reflection gain and collision identities

Statement

Let G, v′, w′, X, w0, and μ be as in Cutoff elastic-reflection collision measure and gain. For f,g∈X, the gain is independent of the chosen Borel representatives, is bilinear, and satisfies

∥G(f,g)∥1,w0≤2∥f∥1,w0∥g∥1,w0.

For f≥0 with finite mass M=∫f dv and finite second moment, it also satisfies

∫G(f,f) dv=M2,∫vG(f,f) dv=M∫vf dv,∫∣v∣2G(f,f) dv=M∫∣v∣2f dv.

If M=1, set A=f(v)f(w), B=f(v′)f(w′), and Δφ=φ(v)+φ(w)−φ(v′)−φ(w′). For every real-valued measurable test φ such that

∫R3∣φ(v)∣G(f,f)(v) dv<∞,∫R3∣φ(v)∣f(v) dv<∞,∫∣AΔφ∣ dμ<∞,∫∣BΔφ∣ dμ<∞,

the following identity holds:

∫R3φ(v)(G(f,f)(v)−f(v)) dv=14∫(B−A)Δφ dμ.

For each fixed n, the map (v,w)↦(v′,w′) is a linear orthogonal involution, preserves v+w and ∣v∣2+∣w∣2, and has Jacobian determinant of absolute value one. The angular measure has full support, hence the product parameter measure μ has full support on R3×R3×S2. Every pair (v,w) and (v~,w~) with the same momentum and squared-speed sum is related by one such reflection.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, a reference speed v0>0, elements of the weighted space X, and the collision parameterization of Cutoff elastic-reflection collision measure and gain.

[A1]

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)), as required by the completed Lebesgue product and measurable change-of-variables suppliers used below.

[F1]

Cutoff elastic-reflection collision measure and gain: v′=v−((v−w)⋅n)n, w′=w+((v−w)⋅n)n, dμ=dv dw dσ(n), and G(f,g)(v)=∫f(v′)g(w′) dw dσ(n).

[F2]

L(Rn) is exactly the completion of the restriction of λn to the Borel sets and A function measurable for a completion is almost everywhere equal to one measurable for the original sigma-algebra: under ACω, Lebesgue measurable sets are the completion of Borel sets, and each completed-measurable function is almost-everywhere equal to a Borel-measurable representative.

[F3]

Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability: for sigma-finite factors, nonnegative measurable functions and integrable functions on the completed product have measurable sections and equal iterated integrals outside the stated null exceptional sections.

[F4]

A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for nonnegative Lebesgue measurable functions: under ACω, a C1 diffeomorphism T:U→V satisfies ∫Vh(y) dy=∫Uh(T(x))∣det⁡DT(x)∣ dx for every nonnegative Lebesgue measurable h.

Proof

Given: [A1], v0>0, and [F1]–[F4].

Proof technique: direct.

1.1F1algebra

Put c=(v+w)/2 and r=(v−w)/2. The formulas in [F1] give v′=c+r−2(r⋅n)n and w′=c−r+2(r⋅n)n. The map r↦r−2(r⋅n)n is reflection across the plane perpendicular to n: applying it twice returns r, and its squared norm is ∣r∣2. The center c is fixed. Hence the pair map is an orthogonal involution on R6, its determinant has absolute value one, v′+w′=v+w, and ∣v′∣2+∣w′∣2=∣v∣2+∣w∣2.

1.2F1constructalgebra

The defining integral of σ has total mass (4π)−1(2)(2π)=1. Every nonempty relative-open subset of S2 contains a patch away from a coordinate pole and seam; its preimage contains an open rectangle on which sin⁡θ>0, so it has positive σ-measure. Every nonempty open subset of the full parameter space contains a product of two Euclidean balls and such a sphere patch; each factor has positive measure, so μ has full support. For an elastic pair, set c=(v+w)/2, r=(v−w)/2, and r~=(v~−w~)/2. Momentum and squared-speed conservation give the same center and ∣r~∣=∣r∣. If r~≠r, choose n=(r−r~)/∣r−r~∣; the equal-norm identity gives 2(r⋅n)n=r−r~, hence the reflection sends r to r~. If r~=r, choose any unit n perpendicular to r when r≠0, and any unit n when r=0. Thus every elastic pair is attained.

2.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra

For each fixed n, let Tn(v,w)=(v′,w′). If h∈L1(R6) is real-valued, write h=h+−h−, where h+=max⁡(h,0) and h−=max⁡(−h,0). Applying [F4] to ∣h∣ shows that h∘Tn is absolutely integrable because Tn has unit absolute Jacobian. Applying [F4] separately to h+ and h−, whose integrals are finite, and subtracting gives ∫R6h(Tn(v,w)) dv dw=∫R6h(v,w) dv dw. By [F2], choose a finite Borel representative h0 equal to h almost everywhere. For every fixed n, [F4] gives the same change-of-variables equality for h0, hence for h. The map (v,w,n)↦h0(Tn(v,w)) is Borel, and [F4] gives ∫R6∣h0(Tn(v,w))∣ dv dw=∥h0∥1 for every n. Since σ(S2)=1, [F3] permits integration of this absolutely integrable identity in n. Thus the cited nonnegative change-of-variables result has the signed L1 consequence used below.

2.2A1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra

Replace the representatives of f and g by Borel representatives using [F2]. Tonelli [F3] makes the sections measurable and permits integration in any order. For each fixed n, the pair reflection in step 1.1 is a C1 diffeomorphism with unit absolute Jacobian, so [F4] gives ∫R6h(v′,w′) dv dw=∫R6h(v,w) dv dw. It follows that ∫∣G(f,g)∣ dv≤∥f∥1∥g∥1. The same change of variables shows that altering either representative on a Lebesgue-null set changes the integrand only on a μ-null set; therefore the output class is independent of representatives. Bilinearity follows from linearity of the integral. Since ∣v∣2≤∣v′∣2+∣w′∣2, one has w0(v)≤w0(v′)+w0(w′). Applying Tonelli and [F4] again gives ∥G(f,g)∥1,w0≤∥f∥1,w0∥g∥1+∥f∥1∥g∥1,w0≤2∥f∥1,w0∥g∥1,w0. The same bounds applied to ∣f∣,∣g∣ define the signed bilinear extension.

3.1F1F3F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra

For f≥0, use Tonelli and the unit-Jacobian involution to obtain ∫G(f,f) dv=∫f(v)f(w) dv dw=M2. For the first moment, the same change of variables gives ∫vG(f,f) dv=∫v′f(v)f(w) dμ. The simultaneous exchange (v,w,n)↦(w,v,n) preserves μ and swaps v′ with w′, while f(v)f(w) is unchanged. Averaging the two expressions replaces v′ by (v′+w′)/2=(v+w)/2, yielding M∫vf dv. Applying the same averaging to the second moment uses (∣v′∣2+∣w′∣2)/2=(∣v∣2+∣w∣2)/2 and gives M∫∣v∣2f dv. The first-moment change of variables is applied coordinatewise to signed integrable functions; finiteness follows from the finite mass and second moment.

4.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Let M=1 and let φ satisfy the four absolute-integrability conditions in the Statement. By [F2], choose a finite Borel representative φ0 equal to φ almost everywhere. The Lebesgue integrals weighted by f or G(f,f) are unchanged, and the products with A or B agree μ-almost everywhere: the unprimed exceptional sets are null by Tonelli, while for each fixed n the primed exceptional sets are null by the measure-preserving involution in step 1.1, so Tonelli makes their union μ-null. Thus it suffices to prove the identity for φ0. Tonelli and the gain definition give ∫φ0(v)G(f,f)(v) dv=∫φ0(v)B dμ. By Tonelli, hn(v,w)=φ0(v)f(v′)f(w′) belongs to L1(R6) for σ-almost every n, since its absolute integral over n,v,w is ∫∣φ0∣G(f,f) dv<∞. For those n, step 2.1 applied to hn gives ∫φ0(v)f(v′)f(w′) dv dw=∫φ0(v′)f(v)f(w) dv dw; the fixed-n change of variables also shows the right side is absolutely integrable. Fubini then gives ∫φ0(v)B dμ=∫φ0(v′)A dμ. The loss term is ∫φ0(v)A dμ because ∫f=1 and σ(S2)=1. The stated integrability conditions make these terms absolutely integrable; particle exchange gives the same for the w′ and w terms, and the conditions on AΔφ0 and BΔφ0 make the incoming/outgoing change of variables integrable. Averaging the difference with its image under simultaneous particle exchange yields 12∫A[φ0(v′)+φ0(w′)−φ0(v)−φ0(w)] dμ=−12∫AΔφ0 dμ. The incoming/outgoing involution sends A to B and Δφ0 to −Δφ0, so ∫(B−A)Δφ0 dμ=−2∫AΔφ0 dμ. Combining these equalities gives the claimed factor 1/4 identity.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources