Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Weak quadric and projective-plane polarization generation

Statement

Assume AC. Let T be a smooth connected projective complex surface and let L be nef and big Cartier, the pullback of an ample Cartier line bundle under a birational contraction to a normal surface. If either (KT,L2)=(−2L,2) or (KT,L2)=(−3L,1), then L is globally generated. In the first case h0(L)=4 and in the second case h0(L)=3.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Exactly the smooth surface and nef-big pullback line bundle in the Statement. Degree-zero effective curves are contracted by the stipulated birational contraction and have negative-definite intersection matrix by Hodge. Stability against rank-one subsheaves is defined using L-intersection, although L need not be ample.

[F1]

Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch for projective morphisms and Riemann-Roch for smooth projective surfaces give the bundle and line Euler formulas. Serre duality for locally free sheaves on a smooth projective variety gives the bundle dualities. The Hodge index theorem for smooth projective surfaces gives the negative-definite orthogonal space and degree/square inequalities.

[F2]

Log adjoint and nef big vanishing on smooth projective varieties gives the empty-boundary nef-big adjoint vanishing used for O and L. Bertini smoothness away from the base locus supplies smooth general members once generation has actually been established. Riemann-Roch for curves: the Euler-characteristic form and Serre duality for finite locally free sheaves on a smooth proper curve give the smooth-fibre and P1 Euler calculations.

[F3]

auslander buchsbaum formula and auslander buchsbaum serre regularity criterion make reflexive modules on a regular surface locally free. This is used for a saturated rank-one kernel. The point-Serre extension and its local freeness are constructed explicitly; no Reider, Bogomolov or surface classification is imported.

[F4]

The Axiom of Choice is inherited from these suppliers.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F4givenconstruct

Let T be a smooth projective surface, L nef and big, KT=−2L and L²=2. Adjoint nef-big vanishing gives H1(OT)=0 and H1(L)=0. RR gives h0(L)=4 and χ(N)=1+(N²+2LN)/2. If L has a base point, its point-Serre bundle V has determinant L and c2=1. A stable V would have h0(End V)=1 and h2(End V)=0 (twist by KT lowers slope), whereas χ(End V)=L²=2. Hence it has a saturated destabilizing line M. As before N=L−M is nonzero effective with a=LN≥0, q=N2, a≤1, a−1≤q≤a2/2, and q even. Negative definiteness excludes a=0; therefore a=1 and q=0.

2.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1construct

Reflect N in an L-degree-zero exceptional irreducible curve E whenever NE<0. Negative definiteness and adjunction with KT E=0 give E2=−2 and arithmetic genus zero, so E is smooth rational. Put Nprime=N+(NE)E. Then Nprime2=N2=0 and LNprime=LN=1. RR gives χ(Nprime)=1+(Nprime2+2LNprime)/2=2. Also h2(Nprime)=h0(KT−Nprime)=0 because that class has negative L-degree. Hence h0(Nprime)≥2, so Nprime is effective. For a fixed ample Cartier divisor H its degree drops by the positive integer -(NE)HE. Positive integral H-degree cannot decrease indefinitely; the process terminates with an effective D of square zero and L-degree one having nonnegative intersection with every exceptional curve. There is a unique nonexceptional component C, with coefficient one; write D=C+B, with B effective exceptional. Adjunction and Hodge give C2=0: C2−2=2pa(C)−2, so C2=2pa(C)≥0, while C2≤ (LC)2/L2=1/2. Therefore DC=C2+BC=BC≥0. Every other component of D is exceptional and has already been treated; a curve outside its support intersects the effective D nonnegatively. Therefore D is nef.

3.1F1F2F3F4step 2.1construct

Its complete system has no fixed part and no base point: the movable part is numerically proportional by Hodge, has positive integral L-degree one, and its fixed exceptional part has square zero, hence vanishes. Let f:T→P1 be the connected-fibre morphism. A general fibre F has F²=0, LF=1 and genus zero by adjunction. There is no singular fibre. For a multiple irreducible fibre, LF=1 forces multiplicity one and arithmetic genus zero makes it smooth. In a reducible fibre, every component has negative square, and ∑mi KT Ci=KT F=−2 gives a component with KT Ci<0; adjunction forces it to be a rational (−1)-curve. This is impossible since KT=−2L has even degree on every curve.

4.1F1F2F3F4step 3.1construct

Thus f is a smooth P1 fibration. Since L restricts to O(1) on every fibre, the Cech cohomology of P1 gives a rank-two bundle E=f∗L, base change, and surjective evaluation f*E→L. The induced T→P(E) is an isomorphism on every fibre and hence an isomorphism. Higher direct images of L vanish, and χ(L)=4 gives deg E=2. A maximal-degree line subbundle O(a)⊂E has a≥1 because χ(E(−1))=2; its quotient is O(2−a). The extension splits, since H1(O(2a−2))=0. Nefness of the tautological L forces both quotient degrees a and2−a to be nonnegative. Thus E is a sum of generated line bundles and L is generated. This contradicts the assumed base point. Consequently the weak quadric polarization is globally generated.

5.1F1F2F3F4step 4.1construct

The argument constructing the maximal line subbundle is elementary on P1: twist down until sections cease, saturate a nonzero section to a line, and choose the largest resulting degree; the degrees are bounded above by embedding E into a sum of sufficiently positive line bundles. No splitting theorem is imported.

6.1F1F2F3F4step 5.1construct

Let T be smooth, L nef and big, KT=−3L and L²=1. Adjoint vanishing gives H1(OT)=H1(L)=0 and RR gives h0(L)=3. Write |L|=B+|P| with B fixed. The moving part has LP>0, and LP≤1, so LP=1, LB=0 and P2≤1. Its square cannot be zero: a square-zero moving pencil has no base point, and its connected primitive fibre F would have LF=1 and F²=0, giving 2g(F)−2=−3 by adjunction. Hence P²=1, and B²=(L−P)²=0 forces B=0 by negative definiteness on the L-null locus.

7.1F1F2F3F4step 6.1construct∎

If |L| had a base point, two general members would have common zero scheme of length one. Their independent first-order local terms make a general member C smooth there; Bertini makes it smooth elsewhere. No exceptional component occurs in a general member, and the total L-degree one permits only one nonexceptional component, so C is connected and integral. Adjunction gives genus zero. But H0(L)→H0(C,L|C) is surjective because H1(OT)=0, and L∣C=OP1(1) is generated. A common base point on C is impossible. Thus L is generated.

Remarks

Research-only source candidate; no production admission or mathematical-acceptance claim. The separate canonical-surface resolution and fundamental-section restriction arguments are required to apply this smooth-surface statement to a singular cut. Full Mella9705012v1 was read for the overall problem; no full Saint-Donat or del-Pezzo classification source was read or invoked.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources