How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Nondegenerate frequency reduction: translating the action variable by the inverse frequency map and the smallness
Statement
Let , , , , , , and let be the one-step smallness constant (the constant of the estimates of One KAM step: the affine generator, its canonical time-one flow, and the quadratic remainder bound). Let the following data be given.
- An open set , a compact set , a radius with , a nonempty set and a conjugation-invariant open complex neighbourhood containing ; and a holomorphic map with for every , where is holomorphic and . (In the applications on a regular frequency patch, supplied by the real analytic inverse function theorem; here it is part of the data.)
- A constant with for all and all .
- A holomorphic function on , -periodic in , with .
Put and assume . Then:
- Taylor decomposition. For every and ,
- Effective perturbation. The function is holomorphic on whenever and , -periodic in , and satisfies
- -smallness. If then ; equivalently the relative smallness satisfies .
- Transfer to the physical Hamiltonian. Let and suppose that the parameter Hamiltonian satisfies the hypotheses of The parameter KAM limit: invariant quasi-periodic motion with frequency and Lagrangian images on (same sequences, same one-step construction, with ), with limit phase family and limit original-parameter map . Then for every the physical family satisfies where and is taken in the action-angle coordinates ; that is, the image is an invariant Lagrangian torus of the physical Hamiltonian with frequency .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The data of clauses 1-3, the constant , and in clause 4 the hypotheses of The parameter KAM limit: invariant quasi-periodic motion with frequency and Lagrangian images for with .
Domain and norm notation , , , , holomorphy and sup-norms; the -label set (Analytic KAM data: angular tori, action-angle neighbourhoods, Fourier cutoffs and Diophantine frequency labels, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space).
Calculus: the chain rule gives and ; the second-order Taylor formula with integral remainder is (The chain rule for total derivatives: , The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then , Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map , Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length).
Hamiltonian conventions: with in the action-first order and (The Hamiltonian field of a function on a phase domain is , and the Poisson bracket is , A phase domain, its canonical one-form and its standard symplectic two-form); a map is canonical iff , which holds for translations because (A map between phase domains preserves the standard two-form iff , and a canonical diffeomorphism carries to clause 1).
The conclusions of The parameter KAM limit: invariant quasi-periodic motion with frequency and Lagrangian images: for the parameter Hamiltonian of its statement, on the real slice, and the pullback of along the real slice vanishes.
Proof
Taylor decomposition. Fix , and put for ; by [F2] is with and , so the integral remainder formula and the Hessian hypothesis give with , hence . This is clause 1.
The effective perturbation. is a sum of compositions of holomorphic maps (, , ) and hence holomorphic on , and it is -periodic in because is; for each complex the containment hypothesis puts the whole Taylor segment in the Hessian-control tube. Repeating the integral remainder argument of step 1.1 there gives the same bound, so with , since . This is clause 2.
The -smallness. Since all quantities are positive, is equivalent to , i.e. to ; under that hypothesis , i.e. . This is clause 3.
Transfer of the invariance. Put and by the definitions of and ; for the fixed original parameter , is a translation, and for every in the domain, while is canonical by [F3] (). Writing and using [F4], .
Lagrangian character and conclusion. By [F3] and [F4] the pullback satisfies on the real slice; with step 3.2 this says that the image of is an invariant Lagrangian torus of with frequency , which is clause 4.
Remarks
- Where nondegeneracy enters. Only through the existence of the inverse frequency map and through the Hessian bound ; no convexity or Legendre-Fenchel duality is used, and need not be convex.
- The threshold. The reduction produces the classical condition on a fixed analytic domain: and are fixed once the domain and the integrable part are fixed, so the factor is exactly a constant times . No statement is made about optimality of the constant.
Depends on
Analytic KAM data: angular tori, action-angle neighbourhoods, Fourier cutoffs and Diophantine frequency labels
One KAM step: the affine generator, its canonical time-one flow, and the quadratic remainder bound
The parameter KAM limit: invariant quasi-periodic motion with frequency and Lagrangian images
A map between phase domains preserves the standard two-form iff , and a canonical diffeomorphism carries to
The Hamiltonian field of a function on a phase domain is , and the Poisson bracket is
A phase domain, its canonical one-form and its standard symplectic two-form
The chain rule for total derivatives:
The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then
Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map
Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space
Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- Jürgen Pöschel, A Lecture on the Classical KAM Theorem, arXiv:0908.2234, §1, §5 and Appendix A (nondegeneracy of the integrable part via the frequency map and the implicit function theorem; the reduction of the perturbation size to the form $\varepsilon\le c\alpha^2$ on a fixed analytic domain), PDF pp. 5-6 and 23-30.
- Rafael de la Llave, A Tutorial on KAM Theory (AMS Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 69, revised version), §6.1-§6.2 (elimination of the parameters by the frequency map and the resulting $\alpha^2$-smallness of the mechanical perturbation), printed pp. 92-106.