Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

One KAM step: the affine generator, its canonical time-one flow, and the quadratic remainder bound

Statement

Let n≥1, τ>n−1, α>0, and let Ωα,τ be the label set of Analytic KAM data: angular tori, action-angle neighbourhoods, Fourier cutoffs and Diophantine frequency labels. Put μ:=τ+3n+2. Suppose 0<r≤1, s,h>0, K≥1, 0<σ≤1, 8σ<s, 0<η≤1/8, and

h≤α2Kτ+1,Kσ≥1,η≤σ.

Let P be holomorphic and 2π-periodic in the angles on Dr,s,h(Ωα,τ), real-valued on real points, with ∣P∣r,s,h≤ε. Set

E:=εαrσμ,E≤cη,

where c=c(n,τ)>0 is sufficiently small. All constants C below depend only on n,τ. Define the affine Taylor polynomial Q and R=TKQ by Affine Taylor splitting in the actions and conservative Fourier truncation of a small perturbation, and put R^=[R], N=ν⋅I. Let F be the zero-mean solution, with Fourier support ∣k∣1≤K, of

ν⋅∂ϑF=R−R^

from The linear homological equation ν⋅∂ϑu=v on a Diophantine label set, with uniform parameter bounds and conservative loss. Order phase coordinates as (I,ϑ), so XF=(−Fϑ,FI), ω=∑idϑi∧dIi, and {f,g}=fϑ⋅gI−fI⋅gϑ. Put W=diag⁡(r−1In,σ−1In). Then:

  1. Generator. F is holomorphic on Dr,s−2σ,h, affine in I, and FI is independent of I. It satisfies {F,N}+R^=R and r−1∣Fϑ∣3r/4,s−6σ,h+σ−1∣FI∣3r/4,s−6σ,h≤CEσn+1,∣W(DXF)W−1∣3r/4,s−6σ,h≤CEσn+1.
  2. Flow. For 0≤t≤1, the flow Φt is defined and holomorphic on Dr/2,s−8σ,h, with Φt:Dr/2,s−8σ,h⟶D3r/4,s−7σ,h. Here parameters are held fixed; DΦt denotes the derivative in (I,ϑ). The map is affine in I, its angle component is independent of I, and it obeys Φt(I,ϑ+2πk,ν)=Φt(I,ϑ,ν)+(0,2πk). It is canonical, and real on real points. Uniformly in t, ∣W(Φt−id)∣r/2,s−8σ,h≤CE,∣W(DΦt−id)W−1∣r/2,s−8σ,h≤CE, h∣W∂νjΦt∣r/2,s−8σ,h/2≤CE(1≤j≤n). In addition, the small action domain has the inclusion Φt(Dηr,s−8σ,h)⊆D2ηr,s−7σ,h.
  3. Remainder. For Φ=Φ1 and χt=(1−t)R^+tR, the identity (N+P)∘Φ=N+R^+P+,P+=(P−R)∘Φ+∫01{χt,F}∘Φt dt holds on Dr/2,s−8σ,h, and on the smaller action domain ∣P+∣ηr,s−8σ,h≤C[E+η2+σ−ne−σK/2]ε.
  4. Frequency shift. Write R^(I,ν)=a(ν)+v(ν)⋅I. Then v is holomorphic on Oh(Ωα,τ), real on real points, and ∣v∣Oh≤B:=Cεr=CαEσμ,∣Dv∣Oh/2≤2nBh.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The parameters, periodic real holomorphic perturbation, widths, cutoff, and smallness conditions of the Statement. Suppressed label sets in all domains are Ωα,τ; vector norms are maximum norms and operator norms are the induced row-sum norms.

[F2]

The Taylor and cutoff supplier Affine Taylor splitting in the actions and conservative Fourier truncation of a small perturbation gives [R]=[Q], ∣P−Q∣2ηr,s,h≤Cη2ε, ∣R∣r,s−2σ,h≤Cσ−nε, ∣RI∣r,s−2σ,h≤Cσ−nε/r, ∣Rϑ∣r,s−2σ,h≤Cσ−n−1ε, and ∣Q−R∣r,s−2σ,h≤Cσ−ne−σK/2ε.

[F3]

The truncated homological supplier The linear homological equation ν⋅∂ϑu=v on a Diophantine label set, with uniform parameter bounds and conservative loss solves each nonzero mode by division by ik⋅ν, whose modulus is at least (α/2)∣k∣1−τ for ∣k∣1≤K on Oh. For zero-mean data of norm M on Dr,u,h, its bounds with angle margin σ are ∣F∣r,u−2σ,h≤CM/(αστ+n), ∣Fϑ∣r,u−3σ,h≤CM/(αστ+n+1), and ∣Fϑϑ∣r,u−4σ,h≤CM/(αστ+n+2). An action derivative costs the reciprocal action margin, independently of the angle margin.

[F5]

Hamiltonian flows preserve the symplectic form (Hamiltonian flows preserve the symplectic form). The chain rule along a trajectory is The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a); with the convention of [F1], ddt(g∘Φt)={g,F}∘Φt.

[F6]

Write each complex coordinate as zj=xj+iyj and define ∂zj:=(∂xj−i∂yj)/2 and ∂zˉj:=(∂xj+i∂yj)/2, acting componentwise on a C1 map through its realification. Its real differential is df=∑j(∂zjf) dzj+∑j(∂zˉjf) dzˉj; if all conjugate-coordinate derivatives vanish, this differential is complex linear on each coordinate slice, so those slices are holomorphic. Continuity then gives holomorphy in the stated joint sense (Complex differentiability at a point, the complex derivative, holomorphic functions, and entire functions, Complex m-space and its real coordinate dictionary). Smooth dependence and uniqueness for the linear variational equation in [F4] can be used to establish this for a holomorphic vector field.

Proof

technique · direct; estimate the affine generator in the scaled phase norm, construct its flow on nested domains, and integrate the exact Hamiltonian identity
1.1F1F2F3algebra

Generator and domains. The datum R−R^ is affine, zero-mean, and has norm at most Cσ−nε on Dr,s−2σ,h. Its Fourier sum is finite and its supported divisors never vanish, so F is holomorphic even on Dr,s−2σ,h, is affine in I, and satisfies the equation there. Apply [F3] with u=s−2σ and action margin r/4. On the appropriate nested domains this gives ∣Fϑ∣≤Cεα−1σ−(τ+2n+1), ∣FI∣≤Cε(αr)−1σ−(τ+2n), ∣Fϑϑ∣≤Cεα−1σ−(τ+2n+2), and ∣FIϑ∣≤Cε(αr)−1σ−(τ+2n+1). In particular, all four bounds hold on D3r/4,s−6σ,h. Since FII=0, the blocks of W(DXF)W−1 are −FϑI, −(σ/r)Fϑϑ, zero, and FIϑ. Substitution of E and μ bounds each nonzero block by CEσn+1 and also gives ∣WXF∣≤CEσn+1. The defining equation is precisely {F,N}=R−R^.

2.1step 1.1F4givenalgebra

Existence through time one. Set U=B3r/4×Ss−6σ. Fix ν∈Oh and an initial point in Br/2×Ss−8σ. In the norm ∣Wz∣∞, its distance to the action boundary of U is at least 1/4 and to the angle boundary at least 2. Step 1.1 gives field and Lipschitz bounds M,L≤CEσn+1 there. Choose c so that CE≤1/8. While a solution remains in U, integration gives ∣W(Φt−z)∣≤Mt for t≤1. It therefore cannot approach the boundary before time one. To justify continuation without a compact domain assumption, a putative finite endpoint has a limit because the velocity is bounded; the limit has the same positive boundary margins, and local existence there extends the trajectory, contradicting maximality. Thus Φt exists for 0≤t≤1, has ∣It∣<3r/4 and ∣Im⁡ϑt∣<s−7σ, and its weighted displacement is at most CE. For initial ∣I∣<ηr, the sharper component estimate gives ∣It−I∣≤CErσn+1≤ηr/2, after decreasing c using E≤cη. Consequently all these trajectories lie in B2ηr×Ss−7σ.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F4algebra

Phase derivatives. Apply the local smooth-dependence result in [F4] on short time intervals in Euclidean balls with closure inside the phase domain. Each trajectory on [0,1] is compact and stays inside that open domain by step 2.1, so finitely many such intervals suffice; the flow composition law transfers their C1 dependence to the entire trajectory. Smooth dependence then gives At=DΦt with A0=id and At′=DXF(Φt)At. Thus A~t=WAtW−1 solves A~t′=(WDXFW−1)(Φt)A~t. Gronwall gives ∣A~t∣≤eLt and, by integrating the equation, ∣A~t−id∣≤eLt−1≤CE for t≤1. These are the asserted phase derivative bounds uniformly over all initial points and parameters.

3.2step 1.1step 2.1F4F6algebra

Holomorphy and affine structure. Treat the parameter as additional state with equation ν′=0. This extended field is holomorphic, so differentiating its real C1 flow with respect to any conjugate initial coordinate gives a homogeneous complex linear variational equation with zero initial value; all conjugate-coordinate derivatives vanish by uniqueness. Hence [F6] gives holomorphy in both phase and parameter variables. Since F is affine in I, the equation ϑ′=FI(ϑ,ν) is independent of I. With this angle trajectory fixed, I′=−Fϑ(I,ϑt,ν) is a linear inhomogeneous equation in I, so its solution depends affinely on the initial action. This proves the stated structure.

3.3step 1.1step 2.1F5algebra

Exact transformed identity. For a fixed initial point set G(t)=(N+χt)∘Φt, where χt=R^+t(R−R^). Using [F5] and {N,F}=−(R−R^), one obtains G′(t)=(R−R^+{N,F}+{χt,F})∘Φt={χt,F}∘Φt. The endpoint values are G(0)=N+R^ and G(1)=(N+R)∘Φ. Integrating and then adding (P−R)∘Φ proves the exact identity in clause 3 on the full time-one domain.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1F1F4algebra

Parameter derivatives. If ν∈Oh/2, every coordinate disc of radius h/2 about ν lies in Oh: this follows directly from the triangle inequality for distance to the label set. Cauchy's estimate [F1], applied to each component of WXF on the same phase domain, therefore gives ∣W∂νjXF∣≤CE/h. The derivative bt=∂νjΦt solves bt′=DXF(Φt)bt+∂νjXF(Φt), b0=0, by [F4]. Multiplying by W and using the bounds already proved, Gronwall gives ∣Wbt∣≤(CE/h)eL for t≤1, which is the required estimate after increasing C.

4.2step 1.1step 3.1step 3.2F1F4F5algebra

Periodicity, reality, and canonicity. The Fourier polynomial F is periodic, and consequently XF(I,ϑ+2πk,ν)=XF(I,ϑ,ν). Translating a trajectory by (0,2πk) and invoking uniqueness proves equivariance. On real points the data satisfy R−k=Rk‾ and the real frequencies give F−k=Fk‾; hence F and its field are real there, and uniqueness preserves reality. By [F5] the real flow is canonical. The same symplectic identity holds on the complex domain directly: in the constant matrix representing ω, the Hamiltonian Jacobian satisfies (DXF)TJ+JDXF=0, by symmetry of the Hessian of F; differentiating (DΦt)TJ(DΦt) using step 3.1 therefore gives zero derivative and initial value J. This proves canonicity throughout the complex domain as well.

4.3step 1.1step 2.1step 3.3F1F2algebra

Remainder on the shrinking action domain. On Dηr,s−8σ,h the trajectories lie in D2ηr,s−7σ,h by step 2.1. Thus [F2] gives ∣(P−R)∘Φ∣≤C[η2+σ−ne−σK/2]ε. Moreover, on every trajectory, ∣Rϑ∣≤Cσ−n−1ε, ∣RI∣≤Cσ−nε/r, and ∣R^I∣≤Cε/r because [R]=[Q] and each action-Taylor coefficient at zero is bounded by ε/r by Cauchy. Since R^ϑ=0, these imply ∣χt,ϑ∣≤Cσ−n−1ε and ∣χt,I∣≤Cσ−nε/r. Step 1.1 gives ∣FI∣≤CEσn+2 and ∣Fϑ∣≤CErσn+1. Therefore ∣{χt,F}∣≤∣χt,ϑ∣1∣FI∣∞+∣χt,I∣1∣Fϑ∣∞≤CEεσ≤CEε. Integrating this bound in the identity of step 3.3 proves clause 3.

5.1F1F2algebra∎

Mean frequency shift. Since the cutoff preserves the zero Fourier mode, R^=[Q]; hence vj=[∂IjP(0,⋅,ν)]. Cauchy's estimate at the centre of Br gives ∣∂IjP(0,ϑ,ν)∣≤ε/r (take radii tending upward to r), and taking a real angular mean does not increase this bound. Thus ∣v∣≤Cε/r=B on Oh, without a Fourier-loss factor. The mean is holomorphic in ν and real on real points. On Oh/2, coordinate Cauchy estimates with radius h/2 bound each entry of Dv by 2B/h; the induced maximum-norm operator bound is consequently 2nB/h. Finally ε/r=αEσμ by definition. This proves clause 4 and completes the step.

Remarks

The flow and exact transformed identity hold on the half-radius domain. The Taylor remainder of order η2 holds on the shrinking domain of radius ηr, using its flow image of radius at most 2ηr. The additional smallness E≤cη supplies this action inclusion. The frequency shift has the action-derivative scale ε/r, which is the bound used when inverting ν↦ν+v(ν) in the parameter step.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources