How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
One KAM step: the affine generator, its canonical time-one flow, and the quadratic remainder bound
Statement
Let , , , and let be the label set of Analytic KAM data: angular tori, action-angle neighbourhoods, Fourier cutoffs and Diophantine frequency labels. Put . Suppose , , , , , , and
Let be holomorphic and -periodic in the angles on , real-valued on real points, with . Set
where is sufficiently small. All constants below depend only on . Define the affine Taylor polynomial and by Affine Taylor splitting in the actions and conservative Fourier truncation of a small perturbation, and put , . Let be the zero-mean solution, with Fourier support , of
from The linear homological equation on a Diophantine label set, with uniform parameter bounds and conservative loss. Order phase coordinates as , so , , and . Put . Then:
- Generator. is holomorphic on , affine in , and is independent of . It satisfies and
- Flow. For , the flow is defined and holomorphic on , with Here parameters are held fixed; denotes the derivative in . The map is affine in , its angle component is independent of , and it obeys . It is canonical, and real on real points. Uniformly in , In addition, the small action domain has the inclusion
- Remainder. For and , the identity holds on , and on the smaller action domain
- Frequency shift. Write . Then is holomorphic on , real on real points, and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The parameters, periodic real holomorphic perturbation, widths, cutoff, and smallness conditions of the Statement. Suppressed label sets in all domains are ; vector norms are maximum norms and operator norms are the induced row-sum norms.
Domain, Fourier, mean, and Hamiltonian conventions are Analytic KAM data: angular tori, action-angle neighbourhoods, Fourier cutoffs and Diophantine frequency labels, The Hamiltonian field of a function on a phase domain is , and the Poisson bracket is , and A phase domain, its canonical one-form and its standard symplectic two-form. Cauchy bounds with action, angle, or parameter margins, and Fourier coefficient bounds, are Fourier decay, Cauchy derivative bounds, lattice shell counts and the exponential small-divisor sums on action-angle neighbourhoods.
The Taylor and cutoff supplier Affine Taylor splitting in the actions and conservative Fourier truncation of a small perturbation gives , , , , , and .
The truncated homological supplier The linear homological equation on a Diophantine label set, with uniform parameter bounds and conservative loss solves each nonzero mode by division by , whose modulus is at least for on . For zero-mean data of norm on , its bounds with angle margin are , , and . An action derivative costs the reciprocal action margin, independently of the angle margin.
Local flow existence, uniqueness, continuous and smooth dependence, and the variational equation are The local flow of an autonomous first-order system, Continuous and Lipschitz dependence on the initial condition on a Picard-Lindelof cylinder, C¹ dependence of an autonomous flow on the initial condition, and the variational equation, and The variational equation along an ODE solution. The domain-qualified composition law is The local flow is a partial one-parameter group: identity, composition and inverse-time laws clause 2. Bounds follow by integrating the ODE and Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients, using The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, and Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length. These real ODE results apply to the realification of complex coordinates.
Hamiltonian flows preserve the symplectic form (Hamiltonian flows preserve the symplectic form). The chain rule along a trajectory is The chain rule for total derivatives: ; with the convention of [F1], .
Write each complex coordinate as and define and , acting componentwise on a map through its realification. Its real differential is ; if all conjugate-coordinate derivatives vanish, this differential is complex linear on each coordinate slice, so those slices are holomorphic. Continuity then gives holomorphy in the stated joint sense (Complex differentiability at a point, the complex derivative, holomorphic functions, and entire functions, Complex -space and its real coordinate dictionary). Smooth dependence and uniqueness for the linear variational equation in [F4] can be used to establish this for a holomorphic vector field.
Proof
Generator and domains. The datum is affine, zero-mean, and has norm at most on . Its Fourier sum is finite and its supported divisors never vanish, so is holomorphic even on , is affine in , and satisfies the equation there. Apply [F3] with and action margin . On the appropriate nested domains this gives , , , and . In particular, all four bounds hold on . Since , the blocks of are , , zero, and . Substitution of and bounds each nonzero block by and also gives . The defining equation is precisely .
Existence through time one. Set . Fix and an initial point in . In the norm , its distance to the action boundary of is at least and to the angle boundary at least . Step 1.1 gives field and Lipschitz bounds there. Choose so that . While a solution remains in , integration gives for . It therefore cannot approach the boundary before time one. To justify continuation without a compact domain assumption, a putative finite endpoint has a limit because the velocity is bounded; the limit has the same positive boundary margins, and local existence there extends the trajectory, contradicting maximality. Thus exists for , has and , and its weighted displacement is at most . For initial , the sharper component estimate gives , after decreasing using . Consequently all these trajectories lie in .
Phase derivatives. Apply the local smooth-dependence result in [F4] on short time intervals in Euclidean balls with closure inside the phase domain. Each trajectory on is compact and stays inside that open domain by step 2.1, so finitely many such intervals suffice; the flow composition law transfers their dependence to the entire trajectory. Smooth dependence then gives with and . Thus solves . Gronwall gives and, by integrating the equation, for . These are the asserted phase derivative bounds uniformly over all initial points and parameters.
Holomorphy and affine structure. Treat the parameter as additional state with equation . This extended field is holomorphic, so differentiating its real flow with respect to any conjugate initial coordinate gives a homogeneous complex linear variational equation with zero initial value; all conjugate-coordinate derivatives vanish by uniqueness. Hence [F6] gives holomorphy in both phase and parameter variables. Since is affine in , the equation is independent of . With this angle trajectory fixed, is a linear inhomogeneous equation in , so its solution depends affinely on the initial action. This proves the stated structure.
Exact transformed identity. For a fixed initial point set , where . Using [F5] and , one obtains . The endpoint values are and . Integrating and then adding proves the exact identity in clause 3 on the full time-one domain.
Parameter derivatives. If , every coordinate disc of radius about lies in : this follows directly from the triangle inequality for distance to the label set. Cauchy's estimate [F1], applied to each component of on the same phase domain, therefore gives . The derivative solves , , by [F4]. Multiplying by and using the bounds already proved, Gronwall gives for , which is the required estimate after increasing .
Periodicity, reality, and canonicity. The Fourier polynomial is periodic, and consequently . Translating a trajectory by and invoking uniqueness proves equivariance. On real points the data satisfy and the real frequencies give ; hence and its field are real there, and uniqueness preserves reality. By [F5] the real flow is canonical. The same symplectic identity holds on the complex domain directly: in the constant matrix representing , the Hamiltonian Jacobian satisfies , by symmetry of the Hessian of ; differentiating using step 3.1 therefore gives zero derivative and initial value . This proves canonicity throughout the complex domain as well.
Remainder on the shrinking action domain. On the trajectories lie in by step 2.1. Thus [F2] gives . Moreover, on every trajectory, , , and because and each action-Taylor coefficient at zero is bounded by by Cauchy. Since , these imply and . Step 1.1 gives and . Therefore . Integrating this bound in the identity of step 3.3 proves clause 3.
Mean frequency shift. Since the cutoff preserves the zero Fourier mode, ; hence . Cauchy's estimate at the centre of gives (take radii tending upward to ), and taking a real angular mean does not increase this bound. Thus on , without a Fourier-loss factor. The mean is holomorphic in and real on real points. On , coordinate Cauchy estimates with radius bound each entry of by ; the induced maximum-norm operator bound is consequently . Finally by definition. This proves clause 4 and completes the step.
Remarks
The flow and exact transformed identity hold on the half-radius domain. The Taylor remainder of order holds on the shrinking domain of radius , using its flow image of radius at most . The additional smallness supplies this action inclusion. The frequency shift has the action-derivative scale , which is the bound used when inverting in the parameter step.
Depends on
Analytic KAM data: angular tori, action-angle neighbourhoods, Fourier cutoffs and Diophantine frequency labels
Fourier decay, Cauchy derivative bounds, lattice shell counts and the exponential small-divisor sums on action-angle neighbourhoods
The linear homological equation on a Diophantine label set, with uniform parameter bounds and conservative loss
Affine Taylor splitting in the actions and conservative Fourier truncation of a small perturbation
The local flow of an autonomous first-order system
C¹ dependence of an autonomous flow on the initial condition, and the variational equation
Continuous and Lipschitz dependence on the initial condition on a Picard-Lindelof cylinder
The variational equation along an ODE solution
The Hamiltonian field of a function on a phase domain is , and the Poisson bracket is
A phase domain, its canonical one-form and its standard symplectic two-form
Hamiltonian flows preserve the symplectic form
Complex differentiability at a point, the complex derivative, holomorphic functions, and entire functions
Complex -space and its real coordinate dictionary
Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients
The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum
Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space
Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length
The chain rule for total derivatives:
The local flow is a partial one-parameter group: identity, composition and inverse-time laws
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- Jürgen Pöschel, A Lecture on the Classical KAM Theorem, arXiv:0908.2234, §3-§4 (the generator $F$ with $\{F,N\}+\hat R=R$, the estimates $r^{-1}|F_\vartheta|+\sigma^{-1}|F_I|\le C\varepsilon/(\alpha r\sigma^{\mu})$, the time-one flow of $X_F$ and the transformed perturbation $\varepsilon_+\le C[\varepsilon/(\alpha r\sigma^{\mu})+\eta^2+K^ne^{-K\sigma}]\varepsilon$), PDF pp. 14-22.
- Rafael de la Llave, A Tutorial on KAM Theory (AMS Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 69, revised version), §3.6 (construction of the correcting canonical transformation, linear in the actions) and §6.1-§6.2 (the quadratic remainder of the Newton step), printed pp. 49-58 and 92-106.