Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Fourier decay, Cauchy derivative bounds, lattice shell counts and the exponential small-divisor sums on action-angle neighbourhoods

Statement

Fix n≥1, r,s>0. Let g be of one of the following two types.

  • Joint-parameter type: h>0, Ω⊆Rn is nonempty, g:Br×Ss×Oh(Ω)→C is holomorphic, bounded, and 2π-periodic in ϑ.
  • Phase-only type: g:Br×Ss→C is holomorphic, bounded, and 2π-periodic in ϑ. In this case put M:=sup⁡Br×Ss∣g∣ and omit the variable ν and all parameter-derivative conclusions below.

In the joint-parameter case put M:=∣g∣r,s,h<∞. In either case, for 0<σ≤s each Fourier coefficient satisfies ∣gk(I,ν)∣≤Me−(s−σ)∣k∣1, where ν is omitted in the phase-only case. For 0<σ≤1 with 2σ<s, the Fourier series of g converges absolutely and uniformly on the full open product Br×Ss−2σ (and also on Br×Ss−2σ×Oh(Ω) in the joint-parameter case), and its sum is g. Every gk is holomorphic in its non-angle variables. The series and every series obtained by differentiating in I, ϑ, or (in the joint-parameter case) ν converge locally uniformly on the corresponding open product and may be differentiated termwise there.

For the joint-parameter type, and for all indicated indices, ∣∂Ijg∣r−δ,s,h≤Mδ(0<δ<r),∣∂ϑjg∣r,s−δ′,h≤Mδ′(0<δ′<s), ∣∂νjg∣r,s,h−δ′′≤Mδ′′(0<δ′′<h), ∣∂Ii∂Ijg∣r−δ,s,h≤2Mδ2,∣∂ϑi∂ϑjg∣r,s−δ′,h≤2Mδ′2,∣∂Ii∂ϑjg∣r−δ,s−δ′,h≤2Mδδ′. The same action and angle inequalities hold in the phase-only case with all parameter slots omitted. These estimates are on the stated smaller open domains; no uniform derivative convergence on the original open domain is asserted.

For every integer m≥1 and 0<σ≤1, #{k∈Zn:∣k∣1=m}≤4nmn−1,∑k∈Zne−σ∣k∣1≤Cnσ−n, ∑k≠0∣k∣1τe−σ∣k∣1≤Cn,τσ−(τ+n)(τ≥0),∑k≠0∣k∣1−τe−σ∣k∣1≤Cnσ−1(τ≥n−1). Here constants depend only on the displayed subscripts. For K≥0 and 0<σ≤1 with 2σ<s, the Fourier cutoff satisfies ∣g−TKg∣r,s−2σ,h≤Cnσ−ne−σKM in the joint-parameter case, with the analogous phase-only supremum bound. Products of bounded holomorphic functions on the same domain are holomorphic and obey the product sup-norm bound. A uniform limit on the full domain of holomorphic functions with norms at most M is holomorphic and has norm at most M.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The dimension n, the domains and widths in one of the two cases of the Statement, and the bounded periodic holomorphic function g.

[F1]

In the joint case, holomorphy means continuity and separate holomorphy on Br×Ss×Oh(Ω); in the phase-only case it means the corresponding condition on Br×Ss. Such functions have local absolutely convergent power series (Analytic KAM data: angular tori, action-angle neighbourhoods, Fourier cutoffs and Diophantine frequency labels, A continuous separately holomorphic function is the sum of an absolutely convergent power series with Cauchy-integral coefficients on every smaller polydisc, Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn).

[F3]

If 0≤r0<R0<S0, f is holomorphic on D(a,S0) and ∣f∣≤M0 on ∣ζ−a∣=R0, then ∣f(q)(z)∣≤q!R0M0/(R0−r0)q+1 for ∣z−a∣≤r0 (Cauchy estimates on a smaller concentric disc).

[F4]

Locally uniform limits of holomorphic functions of one variable are holomorphic; a locally uniformly convergent series can be differentiated termwise. Continuous separately holomorphic functions of several variables are holomorphic and have local power-series expansions (Locally uniform limits of holomorphic functions are holomorphic and their derivatives converge locally uniformly, A locally uniformly convergent series of holomorphic functions may be differentiated term by term, A continuous separately holomorphic function is the sum of an absolutely convergent power series with Cauchy-integral coefficients on every smaller polydisc).

[F5]

For a continuous one-periodic function, its Fej'er means converge uniformly; consequently a continuous one-periodic function with all Fourier coefficients zero is zero (Fejer means converge uniformly for continuous periodic functions).

[F7]

If a holomorphic function on a connected open subset of Cn vanishes on a nonempty open subset, it vanishes identically (A holomorphic function vanishing on a nonempty open subset of a domain vanishes identically).

[F8]

For 0<σ≤1, ∑m∈Ze−σ∣m∣≤1+4/σ (For ∣r∣<1, ∑k≥0rk=1/(1−r), and for ∣r∣≥1 the series diverges).

Proof

Proof technique: direct; shift the full Fourier integrand, use the Cauchy bounds on strict coordinate margins, and sum the lattice shells.

1.1F1F2F6givenalgebra

Fix all variables except one real angle ϑj and put fj(z)=g(I,ϑ1,…,z,…,ϑn,ν)e−ikjz, with the absent parameter omitted in the phase-only case. Since kj∈Z and g is 2π-periodic, fj is periodic and holomorphic for ∣Im⁡z∣<s. For 0<δ<s, shift the integration segment [0,2π] to [0,2π]−iδ sgn⁡(kj); the rectangle integral is zero by [F2], and the two vertical integrals cancel by periodicity. On the shifted segment ∣e−ikjz∣=e−δ∣kj∣, so the jth Fourier integral gains that factor. Applying this in each coordinate, using [F6], gives ∣gk(I,ν)∣≤Me−δ∣k∣1. For 0<σ<s take δ=s−σ; for σ=s the claimed bound is the trivial estimate ∣gk∣≤M.

1.2F8givenalgebra

The number of signed integer vectors with ∣k∣1=m is at most 2n times the number of nonnegative integer n-tuples with sum m. Choosing the first n−1 entries, each between 0 and m, gives at most 2n(m+1)n−1≤22n−1mn−1≤4nmn−1 vectors. Therefore ∑ke−σ∣k∣1=(∑q∈Ze−σ∣q∣)n≤Cnσ−n. For p=τ+n−1≥0, comparison on x∈[m−1,m] gives mpe−σm≤∫m−1m(x+1)pe−σx dx. Thus ∑m≥1mpe−σm≤σ−(p+1)∫0∞(y+1)pe−y dy, which is finite and proves the positive-power bound after applying the shell count. If τ≥n−1, then mn−1−τ≤1 and ∑m≥1e−σm=1/(eσ−1)≤1/σ; this proves the negative-power bound.

1.3F1F4givenalgebra

Products of local power series are local power series and satisfy the pointwise product bound. For a uniform limit on the full domain, continuity passes to the limit and every coordinate slice is a locally uniform limit of one-variable holomorphic functions; [F4] makes the limit separately holomorphic and hence holomorphic, while passing to the limit in the pointwise bound gives norm at most M.

2.1step 1.1F4F5F6F7algebra

For 0<σ≤1 and 2σ<s, the estimate of step 1.1 gives on Ss−2σ ∣gk(I,ν)eik⋅ϑ∣≤Me−σ∣k∣1. The product of one-dimensional geometric sums in [F8] is at most Cnσ−n; hence the Fourier series is absolutely and uniformly convergent on the full stated open product. Its sum is continuous and, by locally uniform convergence and [F4], holomorphic. For fixed non-angle variables, its Fourier coefficients are exactly gk, by uniform convergence and [F6]. The difference from g therefore has zero Fourier coefficients and vanishes on the real torus by [F5], applied successively in the n angle coordinates. At each real angle point all real derivatives of this difference vanish; holomorphicity identifies these with its complex Taylor coefficients, so its local power series is zero on a complex polydisc. The strip Ss−2σ is connected, so [F7] gives equality on the full complex strip. For joint-parameter data, the Fourier coefficient is holomorphic in (I,ν): its Riemann sums are holomorphic and converge uniformly on every compact subset of Br×Oh(Ω), so [F4] and separate holomorphy apply.

2.2step 1.1F3givenalgebra

The coordinate Cauchy estimate [F3] on a radius-δ disc about Ij gives the first action-derivative bound, and the same argument on the angle and parameter coordinates gives the other first-derivative bounds. For a second derivative in the same coordinate, [F3] with order 2 gives the factor 2; for distinct coordinates, use the iterated Cauchy formula on the product of their coordinate circles, obtaining M/(δiδj). This yields the stated action, angle, and mixed estimates on their strict smaller domains.

2.3step 1.1step 1.2F8algebra

Let K≥0 and choose the coefficient-shift margin δ=s−σ/2, which lies strictly between 0 and s. On Ss−2σ each discarded Fourier term is bounded by Me−3σ∣k∣1/2. For ∣k∣1>K, e−3σ∣k∣1/2≤e−σKe−σ∣k∣1/2; summing with [F8] and step 1.2 gives the stated truncation bound, after absorbing 2n into Cn.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.2F4algebra∎

On any compact subset of the smaller open product in clause 1 there are positive action, angle, and (in the joint case) parameter margins to the boundary of the original domain. Apply step 1.1 with a fixed strictly smaller strip width, then apply the coordinate Cauchy estimates of step 2.2 on those margins. Each differentiated Fourier term is bounded by a polynomial in ∣k∣1 times Me−δ∣k∣1 for some δ>0 depending on the compact set. The shell comparison of step 1.2 makes these bounds summable. The Weierstrass test therefore gives locally uniform convergence of each termwise-differentiated series, and [F4] identifies those sums with the corresponding derivatives.

Remarks

  • Why the contour shift needs only Goursat. The shifted contour is a rectangle in one coordinate at a time; the other coordinates are held fixed or have already been shifted, and the independence of the iterated integral from the order of integration is [F6]. No subharmonicity, elliptic regularity or several-variable Cauchy formula is used.
  • The loss is conservative. Clause 3's exponents are those of the direct estimates; the KAM items below use only τ>n−1 and the stated powers τ+n, so no sharper small-divisor bound is assumed. In particular the sharper dimension exponent of the classical theory is not claimed.
  • No choice. All suppliers cited in this item are formulated without the Axiom of Choice beyond what their own statements declare; the countable choice used elsewhere in the batch enters only through the measure-theoretic items.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources