Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite UV subtraction and a divergent factorial toy series

Statement

Assume ACω and the unit convention of QFT example units, metric, gauge, and pairing conventions. Let μ,Λ,μR>0 have units m−1. For k∈R4, ∣k∣ is the Euclidean norm and log⁡ is the natural logarithm. Define the cutoff integral IΛ=∫∣k∣≤Λd4k(2π)4(∣k∣2+μ2). Each term in the subtracted expression has units m−2. Then IΛ=Λ2−μ2log⁡(1+Λ2/μ2)16π2, and the explicitly chosen subtraction has the finite limit lim⁡Λ→∞(IΛ−Λ216π2+μ216π2log⁡Λ2μR2)=μ216π2log⁡μ2μR2. Separately, let x≥0 be dimensionless and let dimensionless λ≥0: F(λ)=∫0∞exp⁡(−x)1+λx dx. For every integer N≥0 the exact finite identity is F(λ)=∑n=0N(−1)nn!λn+(−1)N+1λN+1∫0∞exp⁡(−x)xN+11+λx dx. The last integral is finite and bounded by (N+1)!. The resulting formal real power series ∑n≥0(−1)nn!λn has radius of convergence zero, using the definition in A real power series about a centre, its interval of convergence, and its radius in [0,+∞]. The cutoff expression is one evaluated model integral and one chosen subtraction scheme; it is not a full gauge-invariant QED renormalization theorem or a continuum-existence claim.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume ACω, μ,Λ,μR>0 in m−1, and dimensionless λ≥0.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): the countable-choice assumption used by the radial-measure supplier is explicit.

[F1]

QFT example units, metric, gauge, and pairing conventions: the natural momentum coordinate k has units m−1; the scales μ,Λ,μR therefore have the same units, and this item asserts only its displayed model integral and conventions.

[F2]

Four-dimensional radial measure from two polar planes: for every nonnegative Borel radial function on a closed radius-Λ ball in R4, the radial measure is 2π2r3 dr.

[F3]

The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a): the integral of a continuous derivative on a closed bounded interval is the difference of its endpoint values.

[F4]

The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t: for u>0, log⁡u has derivative 1/u and is the integral of 1/u between positive endpoints.

[F5]

The complex exponential series converges absolutely for every complex argument: the positive exponential is the real restriction of the complex power series (The complex exponential by its power series, exp⁡(z+w)=exp⁡z exp⁡w, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential), which converges everywhere; all terms are nonnegative for real y≥0, so exp⁡(y)≥yn/n! for y≥0 and each integer n≥0.

[F7]

Integration by parts on a closed interval applies to differentiable real functions with integrable derivatives; in particular it applies to continuously differentiable functions. If u,v are differentiable on [a,b] with u′,v′ integrable, then ∫abuv′=u(b)v(b)−u(a)v(a)−∫abu′v

[F9]

Under Countable Choice, bounded Riemann-integrable real functions on compact intervals have the same Lebesgue integrals; nonnegative functions Riemann integrable on every compact half-line interval with a finite improper Riemann limit have the same half-line Lebesgue integral. A bounded Riemann integrable function on a closed bounded interval is Lebesgue measurable and has the same integral, A nonnegative improper Riemann integral on a half-line agrees with the Lebesgue integral

[F10]

For coefficients an∈R and centre c∈R, the radius of ∑n≥0an(x−c)n is the supremum of the r≥0 for which it converges absolutely at every x with ∣x−c∣<r. A real power series about a centre, its interval of convergence, and its radius in [0,+∞]

[F11]

The factorial n! is the natural factorial, and xn uses the natural power convention x0=1, including 00=1. The factorial n! and the falling factorial nk‾, defined by recursion in N, Integer powers am

Proof

1.1givenA1F2F11F3F4F9algebra

The integrand r↦r3/(r2+μ2) is nonnegative and continuous on [0,Λ]. Apply [F2], then divide by (2π)4, to obtain IΛ=18π2∫0Λr3r2+μ2 dr. Polynomial division gives r3/(r2+μ2)=r−μ2r/(r2+μ2). By [F4], an antiderivative is G(r)=r2/2−(μ2/2)log⁡(r2+μ2) on this interval. Its derivative is continuous; its compact-interval integrands are bounded and Riemann integrable, so [F9] identifies their Lebesgue integrals with the calculus integrals. Thus [F3] evaluates the integral as G(Λ)−G(0)=12(Λ2−μ2log⁡(1+Λ2/μ2)). Multiplying by 1/(8π2) gives the claimed expression.

1.2givenA1F3F5F6F7F8F9F11algebra

By [F6], −exp⁡(−x) has derivative exp⁡(−x); [F3] on [0,R] gives ∫0Rexp⁡(−x)dx=1−exp⁡(−R). The positive series [F5] gives exp⁡(R)≥1+R, so exp⁡(−R)→0 and M0=1. For each integer n≥0, [F5] with y=x/2 gives xnexp⁡(−x)≤2nn!exp⁡(−x/2). The majorant has finite integral 2n+1n! by [F3] and [F6]; the positive truncated integrals are increasing and bounded by this finite integral, hence have a finite improper limit. All the integrands are continuous on every compact interval; [F9] identifies these convergent nonnegative improper integrals with their half-line Lebesgue integrals. Thus Mn=∫0∞xnexp⁡(−x)dx is finite. The same bound and exp⁡(x/2)≥1+x/2 show xnexp⁡(−x)→0. For n≥1 and R>0, take u(x)=xn, v(x)=−exp⁡(−x) on [0,R]. They are continuously differentiable with continuous, hence integrable, derivatives. Thus [F7] gives ∫0Rxnexp⁡(−x)dx=−Rnexp⁡(−R)+n∫0Rxn−1exp⁡(−x)dx. The endpoint at zero vanishes since n≥1. Taking R→∞ is justified by the finite positive improper integrals and the vanishing boundary term just proved. It gives Mn=nMn−1, and induction from M0=1 gives Mn=n!. Finally 0≤exp⁡(−x)/(1+λx)≤exp⁡(−x) for λ≥0, so F(λ) is finite.

2.1givenF1F4step 1.1algebra

Substituting the formula from step 1.1, the subtracted quantity equals μ216π2log⁡(μ2μR2Λ2Λ2+μ2). As Λ→∞, the second factor inside the logarithm tends to 1; the limiting logarithm is defined because μ2/μR2>0. Continuity of log⁡ on (0,∞) proves the stated finite limit.

2.2givenF11step 1.2algebra

For every t≥0, finite multiplication of a geometric sum gives 11+t=∑n=0N(−t)n+(−1)N+1tN+11+t. Put t=λx, multiply by exp⁡(−x), and integrate. Step 1.2 evaluates each polynomial moment as n!, while the remainder is bounded by λN+1MN+1=λN+1(N+1)!. This gives the exact finite identity and its stated bound, including λ=0.

2.3givenF1F4F10F11step 1.1algebra

For each fixed λ>0, the absolute terms n!λn in the formal real power series have successive ratio (n+1)λ, eventually greater than 2. They therefore do not tend to zero, so the series does not converge at any positive λ. By [F10], no r>0 has absolute convergence at every ∣λ∣<r: choosing λ=r/2 contradicts the divergence just proved. The only admissible radius is r=0, so the supremum in [F10] is zero. Separately, the bare positive coefficient grows quadratically because IΛΛ2=116π2(1−μ2Λ2log⁡(1+Λ2/μ2))⟶116π2. For the last limit, with y=1+Λ2/μ2, [F4] gives log⁡y=∫1ydu/u≤∫1ydu/u≤2y, so the logarithmic term divided by Λ2 tends to zero.

3.1givenF1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3algebra∎

Steps 1.1 and 2.1 give the exact cutoff integral and selected finite subtraction limit; steps 1.2 and 2.2 prove the finite factorial remainder; step 2.3 proves that the formal power series diverges for every λ>0. These conclusions concern only the two displayed mathematical integrals and do not assert a full QED renormalization theorem or a continuum limit.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources