Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Four-dimensional radial measure from two polar planes

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. For every radius R>0 and every nonnegative Borel function φ:[0,R]→[0,∞], with extended Lebesgue integrals and the convention 0⋅∞=0, ∫{x∈R4: ∣x∣≤R}φ(∣x∣) dλ4(x)=2π2∫0Rφ(r)r3 dr. In particular, the radial Jacobian and angular factor on a four-dimensional ball are r3 and 2π2, respectively.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume ACω, let R>0, and let φ:[0,R]→[0,∞] be Borel.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): ACω is the countable-choice axiom assumed by the measure-theoretic suppliers used below.

[F1]

Borel change of variables from the compact-support formula and Radon uniqueness: for a C1 diffeomorphism between open subsets of Euclidean space, a nonnegative Borel integral changes by the absolute Jacobian determinant, with equality in [0,∞].

[F2]

A box with a degenerate side is Lebesgue null, and so is every coordinate hyperplane in Rn: each coordinate hyperplane in R4 is Lebesgue measurable and null under ACω.

[F3]

Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product: nonnegative product-measurable functions on sigma-finite product spaces may be integrated in either order, including when the result is infinite.

[F4]

Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma: in R4, Lebesgue integration in polar coordinates uses r3 dr and a finite Borel surface measure on S3.

[F5]
[F6]

sin⁡′=cos⁡, cos⁡′=−sin⁡. The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine

[F8]

sin⁡2u+cos⁡2u=1, sine is odd and cosine is even. Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine

[F9]

Principal arcsin⁡ and arccos⁡ invert sine on [−π/2,π/2] and cosine on [0,π], respectively; on (−1,1) their derivatives are 1/1−u2 and −1/1−u2. Principal inverse sine and inverse cosine, For −1<y<1, (arcsin⁡y)′=1/1−y2 and (arccos⁡y)′=−1/1−y2

[F10]

The shifts by π give sin⁡(u+π)=−sin⁡u and cos⁡(u+π)=−cos⁡u; the quarter-turn values and monotonicity intervals fix the angle branches used below. Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi, Signs, monotonicity intervals, and ranges of sine and cosine

[F11]

Under Countable Choice, a bounded Riemann-integrable real function on a compact interval has the same Lebesgue integral. A bounded Riemann integrable function on a closed bounded interval is Lebesgue measurable and has the same integral

Proof

1.1givenA1F2F4F6F7F8F9F10algebra

On the open set U=(0,R)×(0,π/2)×(0,2π)×(0,2π) define T(r,θ,ϕ,ψ)=(rcos⁡θcos⁡ϕ, rcos⁡θsin⁡ϕ, rsin⁡θcos⁡ψ, rsin⁡θsin⁡ψ). Let L=R2∖{(a,0):a≥0}, the plane slit along the nonnegative horizontal ray. For (a,b)∈L, put ρ=a2+b2>0 and define Arg⁡L(a,b) to be arccos⁡(a/ρ) if b>0, 2π−arccos⁡(a/ρ) if b<0, and π if b=0 (then a<0). The inverse and branch identities [F8]–[F10] give cos⁡Arg⁡L=a/ρ and sin⁡Arg⁡L=b/ρ and make this the unique angle in (0,2π). Each non-axis branch is C1 by [F9]. Near the negative horizontal axis, the same angle equals π−arcsin⁡(b/ρ), so it is C1 there too. Positive square roots are C1: continuity follows from ∣u−v∣≤∣u−v∣, and the difference quotient is 1/(u+h+u), with continuous limit 1/(2u) for u>0. Thus all radii in these formulas are C1 by [F7]. Define the open set V={x:∣x∣<R, (x1,x2)∈L, (x3,x4)∈L}. Write A=x12+x22>0, B=x32+x42>0. The inverse of T on V is explicitly r=A2+B2, θ=arccos⁡(A/r)∈(0,π/2), ϕ=Arg⁡L(x1,x2), ψ=Arg⁡L(x3,x4). Indeed cos⁡θ=A/r, sin⁡θ=B/r by [F8]–[F10], and substitution into T gives x; the same branch identities recover every parameter of U. Both directions are C1, so T:U→V is a C1 diffeomorphism. Using [F6]–[F8], The four derivative columns are pairwise orthogonal, with squared lengths 1,r2,r2cos⁡2θ,r2sin⁡2θ; hence ∣det⁡DT∣=r3sin⁡θcos⁡θ. The complement of V in the closed ball is contained in the union of the boundary sphere and the four coordinate hyperplanes: the omitted angular branch cuts lie in x2=0 or x4=0, and the omitted endpoint planes lie in x1=x2=0 or x3=x4=0. The coordinate hyperplanes are null by [F2]. The boundary sphere is null by [F4], applied to its indicator, since its polar radial integral is supported at the singleton {R}, which has one-dimensional Lebesgue measure zero. The origin is already in the coordinate hyperplanes.

2.1givenF1step 1.1

Apply [F1] to T and the nonnegative Borel function x↦φ(∣x∣) on V. The null-complement calculation in step 1.1 shows that its integral over V equals its integral over the closed ball, even when φ takes the value +∞ on a radius whose preimage in the omitted set is null. Therefore the ball integral equals ∫Uφ(r)r3sin⁡θcos⁡θ dr dθ dϕ dψ.

3.1givenA1F3F5F6F7F11step 2.1algebra∎

The integrand in step 2.1 is nonnegative and product-measurable, so [F3] separates the four integrations. The angular factors are ∫0π/2sin⁡θcos⁡θ dθ=1/2 and ∫02π1 dϕ=∫02π1 dψ=2π; the first equality follows from [F5] with antiderivative sin⁡2θ/2, whose derivative is sin⁡θcos⁡θ by [F6]–[F7]. The angular integrands are continuous and bounded on their compact intervals, so [F11] identifies these calculus evaluations with the Lebesgue integrals in [F3]. Their product is 2π2, which proves the formula in the Statement. Endpoints do not change any Lebesgue integral, and all equalities are valid as extended nonnegative integrals.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources