Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Canonical global microlocal pullback by controlled local Fourier construction

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let M,N be Hausdorff second-countable smooth manifolds without boundary, let f:N→M be smooth, and let Γ⊂T∗M∖0 be closed and conic. Put Nf={(f(x),η):η≠0, dfxTη=0}. If Γ∩Nf=∅, every u∈D′(M) with WF⁡(u)⊂Γ has a canonical scalar-distribution pullback f∗u. It agrees with u∘f for smooth scalar functions, commutes with restriction to open subsets, is independent of all coordinate charts and support cutoffs, and satisfies WF⁡(f∗u)⊂f∗Γ:={(x,dfxTη):(f(x),η)∈Γ}. In particular the same assertion holds with Γ=WF⁡(u). A nonproper map and a test whose image meets several target charts are allowed.

The following precise local convergence property is part of the assertion. Call uj→u controlled relative to Γ when all these distributions have wavefront sets in Γ, they converge on every fixed test density, on each fixed compact test support they share one finite derivative-order bound, and, in every chart, for every compact smooth cutoff a and closed cone C with (supp⁡a×C)∩Γ=∅, one has sup⁡jsup⁡η∈C(1+∣η∣)q∣auj^(η)∣<∞(q=0,1,…). An empty cone imposes no condition. Then f∗uj→f∗u is controlled relative to f∗Γ locally, with common support bounds whenever the input supports and the relevant source test supports are fixed. On a compact coordinate patch, compactly supported smooth mollifications of a localized distribution give such an approximating sequence on every smaller patch. Consequently the pullback is uniquely determined by its smooth values and this controlled sequential continuity. This statement uses the explicitly defined convergence property, rather than assuming a general spectral or locally convex extension principle.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The manifolds, closed conic set, map and transversality hypotheses in the Statement; Fourier transform has kernel e−2πix⋅η and distributions pair bilinearly with test densities.

[A1]

Countable Choice supplies the Fourier and Lebesgue interfaces; no further choice axiom is assumed. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

Scalar distributions use the test-density topology, and diffeomorphism pullback uses its absolute-Jacobian transformation. Fixed-compact derivative bounds characterize Euclidean distributions. Scalar distributions on smooth manifolds Local finite order characterization of distributions

[F2]

A compactly supported distribution acts on smooth functions after any cutoff equal to one near its support; its Fourier transform is smooth and polynomially bounded. Compactly supported distributions extend to smooth functions Fourier transform of a compactly supported distribution is a smooth polynomially bounded multiplier

[F3]

Local wavefront regularity is rapid localized Fourier decay; cutoff transfer, chart invariance and the criterion of empty wavefront are proved locally. Local Fourier definition of a wavefront set Wavefront sets are invariant under smooth coordinate changes

[F4]

Fourier inversion and seminorm-dominated parameter integrals pass through distribution pairings with their exact hypotheses; smooth common-compact-support parameter pairings differentiate. Fourier inversion on Schwartz space Schwartz parameter pairing and integral interchange Distribution pairing with smooth parameter families

[F5]

Compact chart subsets admit nonnegative smooth cutoffs equal to one on neighborhoods. Test function cutoffs and euclidean localization

Proof

Given: [A1] and [F1]–[F6].

1.1A1F1F2F3F4F6algebra

We first specify two elementary Fourier estimates used with uniform constants. A compact smooth amplitude a has ∣a^(η)∣≤Cq(1+∣η∣)−q: for ∣η∣≥1 integrate repeatedly in a coordinate with ∣ηi∣≥∣η∣/n, and use its bounded support for ∣η∣≤1. If compact distributions vj share an order-m bound, [F2] gives ∣v^j(η)∣≤C(1+∣η∣)m uniformly. Multiplication by a corresponds to convolution with a^, by [F4]. Uniform rapid decay in a cone transfers to every smaller closed cone under this multiplication: split the convolution into input frequencies in an intermediate regular cone and its complement. In the first region either that frequency is at least half the output size, giving its rapid bound, or the Schwartz factor has size at least half the output size. In the complement, angular separation gives a Schwartz-factor argument bounded below by a positive constant times the sum of both frequency sizes. Taking the decay exponent above m+n+q+1 makes each tail integrable and bounds the convolution by Cq(1+∣η∣)−q. This proves also smooth-factor wavefront containment, with uniform bounds for families. The parameter-pairing lemma justifies the convolution before the estimates; all resulting integrals are absolutely convergent.

1.2givenalgebra

Here is the needed nonstationary estimate, including its dependence on the amplitude. On a fixed compact coordinate set let Φ(x;η,ξ)=f(x)⋅η−x⋅ξ, put R=∣η∣+∣ξ∣≥1, and suppose ∣∇xΦ∣≥cR throughout the amplitude support. Every fixed x derivative of ∇Φ is at most CαR. Differentiating the quotient shows that every fixed derivative of b=∇Φ/(2πi∣∇Φ∣2) is at most Cα′R−1. The operator L=b⋅∇x satisfies Le2πiΦ=e2πiΦ. Repeated integration by parts gives ∣∫e2πiΦa(x) dx∣≤CqR−qmax⁡∣α∣≤qsup⁡∣∂αa∣. Indeed L∗a=−∑i∂i(bia), and induction gives a finite sum of derivatives of a through order q times products of q coefficient derivatives, each contributing R−1. Compact support removes boundary terms. Constants depend only on finitely many derivatives of f, the compact set and c, and are uniform for every frequency in the specified region. The same proof with ξ=0 applies to f(x)⋅η.

2.1A1F1F2F4F5F6step 1.1construct

We construct the smooth approximants rather than assume a distributional regularization theorem. By [F5] choose b≥0 compactly supported and equal to one on a neighborhood of a closed box of positive volume inside the unit ball. Rescale its support into the unit ball. By [F6], 0<∫b<∞; put ρ=b/∫b and ρϵ(z)=ϵ−nρ(z/ϵ). For a compactly supported distribution v, define vϵ(y)=⟨v(z),ρϵ(y−z)∣dz∣⟩. It is smooth by [F4], supported in the ϵ-neighborhood of supp⁡v, and has common compact support for 0<ϵ≤ϵ0. Pairing against a test h and using [F4] gives ⟨vϵ,h⟩=⟨v,hϵ⟩, where hϵ(z)=∫ρ(w)h(z+ϵw)dw. Every derivative of hϵ−h tends uniformly to zero on the common compact support, by uniform continuity of the corresponding derivative of h. The finite-order bound proves weak convergence and a common order bound, because the averaging bounds every derivative seminorm of hϵ by the corresponding seminorm of h on a fixed enlarged compact. The same interchange, or Fourier testing, gives vϵ^(η)=ρ^(ϵη)v^(η),∣ρ^(ϵη)∣≤∫ρ=1. Hence all polynomial and regular-cone bounds for v are uniform in ϵ. For a smaller local cutoff a, first choose b0=1 near its support, inside a wavefront-regularity localization. For sufficiently small ϵ, a(ρϵ∗v)=a(ρϵ∗(b0v)); step 1.1 gives the uniform regular-cone bound. The finitely many initial terms of a sequence ϵj↓0 are smooth and have their own finite rapid bounds. Compactness and finite subdivision into regular base/cone patches handle any compact cutoff/cone pair disjoint from WF⁡(v). Thus these approximants are controlled on each smaller patch.

2.2F1F3F5step 1.1construct

Fix x0∈N and use one source chart and one target chart about y0=f(x0), of positive dimensions for now. On their unit frequency spheres set K0={η:dfx0Tη=0}. It is compact and disjoint from the compact fiber Γy0∩Sm−1. Choose an open conic neighborhood V of K0 with closure of directions still disjoint from that fiber. Closedness of Γ implies that the same disjointness holds over a sufficiently small target neighborhood: otherwise points of Γ approaching y0, with directions in the compact closure, have a subsequence with a forbidden limit. Outside V, compactness gives ∣dfx0Tη∣≥2c∣η∣; shrink the source chart so ∣dfxTη∣≥c∣η∣ there. Shrink again so its image lies in the target neighborhood and choose its target cutoff β supported there. If K0 is empty take V empty. Localized Fourier transforms βu^ are rapidly decreasing on V: for each compact set of directions in V, the regularity witnesses over supp⁡β give a finite base cover and cutoff decomposition; step 1.1 transfers the bounds, and a finite direction cover gives one bound for each order. Choose V initially with closure inside this regular neighborhood, so the bounds hold on its whole set of directions. Only finitely many witnesses are used for each such estimate.

3.1A1F1F2F4F6step 1.2step 2.2construct

On a compact source test support H inside this small patch, choose β=1 near f(H) and write v=βu. For ω=a(x)∣dx∣ define Ta(η)=∫e2πif(x)⋅ηa(x)dx,Pf(v)(ω)=∫v^(η)Ta(η)dη. On V, v^ decreases arbitrarily fast and ∣Ta∣≤vol⁡(H)sup⁡∣a∣. Off V, step 1.2 with ξ=0 gives ∣Ta(η)∣≤Cq(1+∣η∣)−qpq(a). Take q>m+mv+1, where m is the target dimension and mv is a finite-order exponent from [F2]. The integrals are absolutely convergent, with ∣Pf(v)(ω)∣≤Cpq(a). This proves fixed-support continuity, hence a distribution by [F1]. If vj→v is controlled, their common finite-order and regular-cone bounds give the same integrable majorant. Weak convergence gives v^j(η)→v^(η) for each fixed η, so dominated convergence proves Pf(vj)(ω)→Pf(v)(ω), with a uniform fixed-support order bound. For smooth v, Fourier inversion and absolutely integrable Fubini identify the value with ∫v(f(x))ω(x).

4.1F2F3F6step 1.2step 2.2step 3.1algebra

We prove the output cone estimate with uniform bounds, needed also for controlled limits. Fix an output direction ξ0 at x0 outside f∗Γ. Shrink the source base patch and its output cone C about ξ0. There is a target singular-direction cone G containing every direction of Γ over the target cutoff support such that for η∈G, ξ∈C and x in the source patch, ∣dfxTη−ξ∣≥c1(∣η∣+∣ξ∣). To see this, normalize ∣η∣+∣ξ∣=1. A sequence contradicting the bound has a convergent frequency subsequence and base limit. If the output frequency limit were zero, local transversality from step 2.2 forces the input frequency limit to be zero; if the input limit were zero the equation forces the output limit to be zero. Both contradict normalization. Otherwise the limit is a covector in f∗Γ with output direction in the chosen excluded closed cone. Closedness and compactness therefore give the separation after shrinking; choose a slightly larger closed input cone still satisfying it. The complement of G is regular for the localized input. To Fourier transform a compact output localization replace a in step 3.1 by a(x)e−2πix⋅ξ. On G, apply step 1.2 and the polynomial input bound. Its integral is at most Cq(1+∣ξ∣)−q+m+mv after increasing q. Off G, use a uniform bound B for dfxT. For ∣η∣≤∣ξ∣/(2max⁡(1,B)), the phase is nonstationary and the same estimate applies. For the remaining regular input frequencies, the bound on Ta and arbitrary input decay give CN(1+∣ξ∣)−N+m after integration. Taking these exponents arbitrarily large proves rapid output decay on C. The estimates use only common input bounds, so they hold uniformly for controlled sequences. The set f∗Γ is closed locally away from the zero section: transversality bounds ∣η∣ by a constant times ∣dfxTη∣ on Γ over a smaller compact patch, allowing the same compactness argument. Thus the output weak limits and these uniform bounds give exactly the claimed controlled convergence.

4.2F3F5step 2.1step 3.1construct

The formula is independent of the allowed target cutoff. For two cutoffs equal to one near f(H), first work inside one of the small target neighborhoods of step 2.2. Their difference times u is a compact distribution w zero on a neighborhood of the compact set f(H). Its mollifications from step 2.1 vanish at every f(x), x∈H, for sufficiently small ϵ, since their supports expand by at most ϵ and the two closed compact sets have positive Euclidean distance. Their ordinary smooth pullbacks therefore pair to zero with ω. The controlled continuity in step 3.1 makes Pf(w)(ω)=0. If the two originally allowed target neighborhoods differ, insert a third cutoff supported in their overlap and equal to one near the image of a smaller source support; compare with it in each neighborhood and use a finite decomposition of ω. This also proves locality and independence of extensions outside the target chart.

5.1A1F1F2F3F4F6step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1algebra

Controlled convergence is invariant under a smooth change of coordinates. For completeness, the Fourier estimate is the one for a diffeomorphism, not an assumed arbitrary-map pullback. In source coordinates y=ψ(z), the localized transformed Fourier value pairs vj with a(ψ(z))∣det⁡Dψ(z)∣e−2πiψ(z)⋅η. Insert a cutoff equal to one on this compact support and use Fourier inversion [F4]. The resulting phase is z⋅ζ−ψ(z)⋅η. In the near-stationary region ζ is comparable to η and lies in a regular source cone whenever the transformed compact base/output cone avoids the transported Γ; there use the uniform regular bounds and a polynomial volume estimate. On the complementary region ∣ζ−Dψ(z)Tη∣≥c(∣ζ∣+∣η∣); step 1.2 and the uniform polynomial bound give arbitrary rapid decay after integration. This is precisely the chart-invariance estimate with constants uniform in j. Common finite-order bounds transfer by the finite chain/product rules for compactly supported test densities, and weak convergence transfers because diffeomorphism pullback is already defined by the density transpose. Hence the same smooth approximants from step 2.1, expressed in either target chart, are controlled. Both local candidates in step 3.1 are their limits and equal the same ordinary smooth pullback at every stage. They are therefore equal. A change of source chart similarly gives the same smooth integrals by the absolute-Jacobian substitution in [F6], followed by the controlled limit. This proves coordinate covariance of the constructed scalar distribution and compatibility with the previously defined diffeomorphism pullback.

6.1F1F5step 2.2step 3.1step 4.1step 4.2step 5.1construct

We now glue; no assumption that f(supp⁡ω) fits one chart is made. Cover the compact support of a test density by finitely many small source patches of step 2.2. Shrink the covering patches still covering that support, take compact smooth cutoffs bi supported in the original patches and equal to one on the smaller ones, and put s=∑ibi. It is positive near the test support. With another compact cutoff h=1 there and supported where s>0, set ai=hbi/s there and zero elsewhere. They are smooth, subordinate, and sum to one near the test support. Define ⟨f∗u,ω⟩=∑iPf,i(u)(aiω). On an overlap the two terms are equal: shrink around each point to a common source patch and a target chart inside the two target-chart overlap, use step 4.2 for cutoffs and step 5.1 for coordinates, and decompose a compact overlap test into finitely many such patches. Two partitions now give the same answer by the double sum on aiaj′ω. This proves linearity, independence and compatibility with restriction. For each fixed compact support choose this finite cover once. Each local pairing has a finite seminorm estimate by step 3.1; multiplication by the fixed ai is bounded by finitely many compact derivative seminorms. Their finite sum is continuous on that fixed-support space, and the test-density topology in [F1] gives a global distribution. Local estimates in step 4.1 give its wavefront bound and controlled sequential continuity.

7.1A1F1F3step 2.1step 6.1algebra∎

If a source or target coordinate dimension is zero, every local distribution there is a scalar function, and the relevant local map is an ordinary smooth map from or to a point. For a zero-dimensional source, transversality forces the target distribution to be smooth near its image point, by [F3], so evaluation is defined; for a zero-dimensional target its local scalar pulls back as a constant. The finite-test gluing above handles zero-dimensional components, and an empty source has only the zero test space and its unique distribution. Zero inputs pull back to zero. Nonproper f has required no extra hypothesis: each construction used only a compact source test support and its compact image. Finally any other rule agreeing on smooth inputs and obeying the stated controlled sequential continuity agrees on each small patch by the actual approximants of step 2.1, hence agrees globally by step 6.1. All coverings and comparisons for one test use finite choice only; [A1] enters exactly through the declared Fourier and Lebesgue suppliers.

Remarks

The local separation in step 2.2 precedes every Fourier construction. Transversality at points over f(x) is not replaced by a single conic separation over the image of an arbitrary compact source set. Smooth approximation here has explicitly proved common finite-order and rapid-decay bounds; weak convergence alone would not justify a singular pullback limit.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources